Mobilizing Gendered Piety in Sri Lanka’s Contemporary Bhikkhun? Ordination Dispute

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Buddhist Studies Review Pub Date : 2019-08-26 DOI:10.1558/bsrv.35050
Tyler A. Lehrer
{"title":"Mobilizing Gendered Piety in Sri Lanka’s Contemporary Bhikkhun? Ordination Dispute","authors":"Tyler A. Lehrer","doi":"10.1558/bsrv.35050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the late 1980s, in defiance of Sri Lanka’s major monastic fraternities (nik?yas) and the government, Buddhist women and men have begun to organize across distinctions of national boundary and Buddhist tradition to reinstate a defunct bhikkhun? ordination lineage for renunciant women. Drawing on fieldwork from the winter of 2015–16, this article considers some of the strategies by which Sri Lanka’s bhikkhun?s and their supporters constitute the burgeoning lineage(s) as both legitimate and necessary for the continued health and vitality of an otherwise ailing Buddhist s?sana. I argue that Sri Lanka’s bhikkhun?s engage in highly-visible forms of adherence to vinaya rules and social expectations for ideal monastic behavior set against a popular discourse about the laxity of male renunciants. Such engagement is both political and soteriological; while it is aimed at fulfilling legitimizing gendered expectations of women’s piety, it is expressed primarily in terms of the eradication of personal and societal suffering through forms of practice that accord with the ideal of a pious monastic. Thus, in contrast to discourses which locate bhikkhun?s as subjects whose presence weakens the s?sana’s duration and strength, in this new discourse Sri Lanka’s bhikkhun?s become virtuous agents of social service and moral restoration. The article concludes by identifying emerging connections between this discourse and an alreadygendered xenophobic Buddhist nationalism.","PeriodicalId":41430,"journal":{"name":"Buddhist Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buddhist Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.35050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since the late 1980s, in defiance of Sri Lanka’s major monastic fraternities (nik?yas) and the government, Buddhist women and men have begun to organize across distinctions of national boundary and Buddhist tradition to reinstate a defunct bhikkhun? ordination lineage for renunciant women. Drawing on fieldwork from the winter of 2015–16, this article considers some of the strategies by which Sri Lanka’s bhikkhun?s and their supporters constitute the burgeoning lineage(s) as both legitimate and necessary for the continued health and vitality of an otherwise ailing Buddhist s?sana. I argue that Sri Lanka’s bhikkhun?s engage in highly-visible forms of adherence to vinaya rules and social expectations for ideal monastic behavior set against a popular discourse about the laxity of male renunciants. Such engagement is both political and soteriological; while it is aimed at fulfilling legitimizing gendered expectations of women’s piety, it is expressed primarily in terms of the eradication of personal and societal suffering through forms of practice that accord with the ideal of a pious monastic. Thus, in contrast to discourses which locate bhikkhun?s as subjects whose presence weakens the s?sana’s duration and strength, in this new discourse Sri Lanka’s bhikkhun?s become virtuous agents of social service and moral restoration. The article concludes by identifying emerging connections between this discourse and an alreadygendered xenophobic Buddhist nationalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在斯里兰卡当代比丘中调动性别虔诚?排序争议
自20世纪80年代末以来,无视斯里兰卡主要的修道院兄弟会(nik?yas)和政府,佛教女性和男性开始跨越国界和佛教传统的界限组织起来,恢复一个已经不复存在的比丘?失礼妇女的圣职血统。根据2015-16年冬天的实地考察,本文考虑了斯里兰卡比丘?s和他们的支持者构成了一个新兴的世系,认为这对一个原本境况不佳的佛教徒的持续健康和活力来说既是合法的,也是必要的?sana。我认为斯里兰卡的比丘?我们以高度可见的形式遵守维纳亚规则,并对理想的修道行为抱有社会期望,而这与关于男性戒严令的流行言论相反。这种参与既是政治性的,也是时代性的;虽然它旨在实现对女性虔诚的性别期望的合法化,但它主要表现为通过符合虔诚修道院理想的实践形式消除个人和社会痛苦。因此,与定位比丘的话语相比?s作为主体,其存在削弱了s?萨那的持续时间和力量,在这个新的话语斯里兰卡的比丘?s成为社会服务和道德恢复的良性推动者。文章最后指出了这一话语与一种已经滋长的仇外佛教民族主义之间正在出现的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Science and Development in Thai and South Asian Buddhism, by David L. Gosling Rewriting Buddhism: Pali Literature and Monastic Reform in Sri Lanka, 1157-1270, by Alastair Gornall Happy 40th Birthday, Buddhist Studies Review! Visions of the Buddha: Creative Dimensions of Early Buddhist Scripture, by Eviatar Shulman Subject’s Guide to the Realms of Karma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1