{"title":"Managing Nascent Digital Competition: An Assessment of Australian Merger Law under Conditions of Radical Uncertainty","authors":"Joshua Sinn","doi":"10.53637/bpkh7535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is among several national competition regulators that have recently expressed concerns about the inability of existing merger law to address competition issues that arise from acquisitions of digital start-ups. The unique characteristics of rapidly evolving digital markets present unprecedented challenges for traditional merger regimes that rely on predictions of future market conditions to justify intervention. This article argues that Australian merger law is unable to adequately address the uncertain risks presented by acquisitions of nascent competitors in digital markets. It further argues that traditional rule-based merger regimes are unable to properly navigate conditions of extreme uncertainty. An alternative regulatory model that is explored in detail is experimentalist governance, which promises to allow regulators and firms to respond to radical uncertainty by recursively crafting solutions to problems that emerge in dynamic digital markets over time.","PeriodicalId":45951,"journal":{"name":"UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES LAW JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53637/bpkh7535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is among several national competition regulators that have recently expressed concerns about the inability of existing merger law to address competition issues that arise from acquisitions of digital start-ups. The unique characteristics of rapidly evolving digital markets present unprecedented challenges for traditional merger regimes that rely on predictions of future market conditions to justify intervention. This article argues that Australian merger law is unable to adequately address the uncertain risks presented by acquisitions of nascent competitors in digital markets. It further argues that traditional rule-based merger regimes are unable to properly navigate conditions of extreme uncertainty. An alternative regulatory model that is explored in detail is experimentalist governance, which promises to allow regulators and firms to respond to radical uncertainty by recursively crafting solutions to problems that emerge in dynamic digital markets over time.
澳大利亚竞争与消费者委员会(Australian Competition and Consumer Commission)是最近对现有合并法无法解决收购数字初创企业所产生的竞争问题表示担忧的几个国家竞争监管机构之一。快速发展的数字市场的独特特征给传统的合并制度带来了前所未有的挑战,这些制度依赖于对未来市场状况的预测来证明干预的合理性。本文认为,澳大利亚的合并法无法充分解决数字市场中收购新生竞争对手所带来的不确定性风险。它进一步认为,传统的基于规则的合并制度无法正确应对极端不确定性的条件。另一种正在详细探索的监管模式是实验主义治理,它承诺允许监管机构和企业通过递归地制定解决方案来应对动态数字市场中随着时间的推移出现的问题,从而应对根本的不确定性。