Agricultural infrastructure and the gardens of Middleton Place

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF GARDENS & DESIGNED LANDSCAPES Pub Date : 2020-03-24 DOI:10.1080/14601176.2020.1732644
Roxi Thoren
{"title":"Agricultural infrastructure and the gardens of Middleton Place","authors":"Roxi Thoren","doi":"10.1080/14601176.2020.1732644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Middleton Place, a former rice plantation west of Charleston, South Carolina, contains gardens that are exceptional in US garden history. They are among the oldest extant designed gardens in the United States, and the plantation is one of very few properties in continuous family ownership since the era of the royal land grant. While time, natural disaster, and war all took their toll on the plantation, the bones of the eighteenth-century gardens are intact, and they are the only colonial Baroque gardens in the United States that were never substantially altered (figure 1). The 20-acre gardens were part of a regional landscape of rice production that included Middleton Place itself and the Middleton family’s dozens of rice plantations, and that comprised the South Carolina lowcountry region. Middleton Place is an unusual intact example of a lowcountry plantation where garden and rice fields were two sides of the same coin: landscapes carefully organized, formed, and regulated to guide human activity in the production and display of wealth and prestige. The seat of the Middleton family’s rice enterprise for over a century, the 6,500-acre plantation was renowned for its formal gardens and terraced site, now a National Historic Landmark. Yet despite its significance, Middleton Place has not been studied as an integrated garden and agricultural landscape. Mentions of the plantation in garden histories discuss the extraordinary terraces stepping down to the Ashley River, and the Le Nôtre-inspired gardens that use a nearlymile-long reach of the river to create a water axis at the scale of Vaux-leVicomte. The gardens, altered by war, earthquake, and natural processes, have been interpreted based on their partial reconstruction in the twentieth-century, and problematically, they have never been fully analyzed or critiqued as embedded within an agricultural landscape. Geometric gardens and geomorphic rice fields mirrored each other, as earthworks and water flow organized the two landscapes and structured the daily and seasonal movements of two groups of people, the black enslaved workers and the white planters. The domestic core of the plantation is at the eastern edge of the property, overlooking the Ashley River and organized along a 1,980-foot (30-chain) east–west axis. Within the core, geometrically organized leisure and display areas are located to the north and east, with the productive landscapes located to the south and west where they are organized functionally by topography, hydrology and solar access. A 6-acre parterre garden overlooks the river, flowing down over beveled terraces influenced by Versailles’ Triton Fountain to two oblong reflecting pools and then to the river. An 11-acre pleasure garden sits to the north, and to the south were vegetable gardens and an orchard, along with farm buildings, the work yard, and ‘the street’ containing the homes and gardens of the enslaved workers (figure 2).","PeriodicalId":53992,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF GARDENS & DESIGNED LANDSCAPES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14601176.2020.1732644","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF GARDENS & DESIGNED LANDSCAPES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14601176.2020.1732644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Middleton Place, a former rice plantation west of Charleston, South Carolina, contains gardens that are exceptional in US garden history. They are among the oldest extant designed gardens in the United States, and the plantation is one of very few properties in continuous family ownership since the era of the royal land grant. While time, natural disaster, and war all took their toll on the plantation, the bones of the eighteenth-century gardens are intact, and they are the only colonial Baroque gardens in the United States that were never substantially altered (figure 1). The 20-acre gardens were part of a regional landscape of rice production that included Middleton Place itself and the Middleton family’s dozens of rice plantations, and that comprised the South Carolina lowcountry region. Middleton Place is an unusual intact example of a lowcountry plantation where garden and rice fields were two sides of the same coin: landscapes carefully organized, formed, and regulated to guide human activity in the production and display of wealth and prestige. The seat of the Middleton family’s rice enterprise for over a century, the 6,500-acre plantation was renowned for its formal gardens and terraced site, now a National Historic Landmark. Yet despite its significance, Middleton Place has not been studied as an integrated garden and agricultural landscape. Mentions of the plantation in garden histories discuss the extraordinary terraces stepping down to the Ashley River, and the Le Nôtre-inspired gardens that use a nearlymile-long reach of the river to create a water axis at the scale of Vaux-leVicomte. The gardens, altered by war, earthquake, and natural processes, have been interpreted based on their partial reconstruction in the twentieth-century, and problematically, they have never been fully analyzed or critiqued as embedded within an agricultural landscape. Geometric gardens and geomorphic rice fields mirrored each other, as earthworks and water flow organized the two landscapes and structured the daily and seasonal movements of two groups of people, the black enslaved workers and the white planters. The domestic core of the plantation is at the eastern edge of the property, overlooking the Ashley River and organized along a 1,980-foot (30-chain) east–west axis. Within the core, geometrically organized leisure and display areas are located to the north and east, with the productive landscapes located to the south and west where they are organized functionally by topography, hydrology and solar access. A 6-acre parterre garden overlooks the river, flowing down over beveled terraces influenced by Versailles’ Triton Fountain to two oblong reflecting pools and then to the river. An 11-acre pleasure garden sits to the north, and to the south were vegetable gardens and an orchard, along with farm buildings, the work yard, and ‘the street’ containing the homes and gardens of the enslaved workers (figure 2).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米德尔顿广场的农业基础设施和花园
米德尔顿广场(Middleton Place)是南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿以西的一个前水稻种植园,这里有美国花园史上独一无二的花园。它们是美国现存最古老的设计花园之一,种植园是自皇家土地授予时代以来为数不多的连续家族所有的财产之一。虽然时间、自然灾害和战争都对种植园造成了损失,但18世纪花园的骨骼完好无损,它们是美国唯一一个从未被实质性改变的殖民巴洛克花园(图1)。20英亩的花园是水稻生产区域景观的一部分,其中包括Middleton Place本身和Middleton家族的数十个水稻种植园,还包括南卡罗来纳州的低地地区。Middleton Place是一个不同寻常的低地种植园的完整例子,花园和稻田是一枚硬币的两面:精心组织、形成和管理的景观,以指导人类在生产和展示财富和声望方面的活动。一个多世纪以来,这座占地6500英亩的种植园一直是米德尔顿家族水稻企业的所在地,以其正式的花园和梯田而闻名,现在已成为国家历史地标。然而,尽管米德尔顿广场意义重大,但它并没有被研究为一个综合花园和农业景观。花园历史中提到的种植园讨论了通往阿什利河的非凡露台,以及以勒诺特为灵感的花园,这些花园利用近一英里长的河流形成了一条Vaux leVicomte规模的水轴线。这些花园因战争、地震和自然过程而改变,人们根据它们在20世纪的部分重建进行了解释,但有问题的是,它们从未被充分分析或批评为嵌入农业景观中。几何花园和地貌稻田相互镜像,土方工程和水流组织了这两种景观,并组织了两类人的日常和季节性流动,即黑人奴隶工人和白人种植园主。种植园的国内核心位于该地产的东部边缘,俯瞰阿什利河,沿1980英尺(30米)的东西轴线排列。在核心区内,北部和东部有几何结构的休闲和展示区,南部和西部有生产性景观,这些景观通过地形、水文和太阳能利用进行功能组织。一个占地6英亩的花坛花园俯瞰着河流,流经受凡尔赛海卫一喷泉影响的倾斜露台,到达两个长方形的倒影池,然后流入河流。北边是一个占地11英亩的休闲花园,南边是菜园和果园,还有农场建筑、工作场地和“街道”,里面有被奴役工人的家和花园(图2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes addresses itself to readers with a serious interest in the subject, and is now established as the main place in which to publish scholarly work on all aspects of garden history. The journal"s main emphasis is on detailed and documentary analysis of specific sites in all parts of the world, with focus on both design and reception. The journal is also specifically interested in garden and landscape history as part of wider contexts such as social and cultural history and geography, aesthetics, technology, (most obviously horticulture), presentation and conservation.
期刊最新文献
Philosophy of gardening and a sense for scents. An environmental ethics perspective Making the scent of the perfumer’s garden: imperial and common plague remedies used during the Antonine Plague (approx. 165–190 CE) Gardens as spaces of physical and mental well-being in ancient literature Garden Cities of yesterday, roots of urban sustainability? Radical histories of times of revolution and their legacies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1