Psychosocial Factors Impacting New Graduate Registered Nurses and Their Passage to Becoming Competent Professional Nurses: An Integrative Review

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Regulation Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/S2155-8256(22)00081-3
Peter David Mellor RN, DipT (NEd), BEd (NursSt), Grad Dip Ed Admin, MClinEd, PhD, Anita De Bellis RN, BN (Man), MN, PhD, Amanda Muller BA, PhD, Grad Cert PH, Grad Cert Ed, Grad Cert TESOL
{"title":"Psychosocial Factors Impacting New Graduate Registered Nurses and Their Passage to Becoming Competent Professional Nurses: An Integrative Review","authors":"Peter David Mellor RN, DipT (NEd), BEd (NursSt), Grad Dip Ed Admin, MClinEd, PhD,&nbsp;Anita De Bellis RN, BN (Man), MN, PhD,&nbsp;Amanda Muller BA, PhD, Grad Cert PH, Grad Cert Ed, Grad Cert TESOL","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(22)00081-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health services offer new graduate registered nurses (NGRNs) employment primarily via specialized transition programs. However, findings continue to indicate that these programs are mostly counterproductive in the provision of a supportive environment. As a consequence, the health of graduates and safety of their patients is often at risk.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The specific aim of this integrative review was to review, critique, and synthesize the existing literature with regard to the spectrum of factors and perceptions that have an impact on NGRNs and their passage to becoming competent professional nurses. The overall aim was to reconceptualize the approach to NGRN transition and develop new frameworks or perspectives.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This study used an integrative review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for </span>Systematic Reviews<span> and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The CINAHL, PsycInfo, Google Scholar, and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies published in English in an academic journal between 2015 and 2021. Eligible studies were categorized conceptually in accordance within a recognized framework for integrative reviews.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 41 studies were included in the review. This review found that healthcare organizations are primarily solipsistic and provision of consistent quality support, or any support at all, for NGRNs was not assured. As a consequence, purposive psychosocial preparation of nursing students for self-support during transition is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An intense focus on psychosocial preparation of nursing students in order to scaffold the transition to practice experience and thus ensure patient safety is advocated. Proposals for change are recommended at the undergraduate level, which includes comprehensive curriculum development in both theory and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825622000813","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Health services offer new graduate registered nurses (NGRNs) employment primarily via specialized transition programs. However, findings continue to indicate that these programs are mostly counterproductive in the provision of a supportive environment. As a consequence, the health of graduates and safety of their patients is often at risk.

Purpose

The specific aim of this integrative review was to review, critique, and synthesize the existing literature with regard to the spectrum of factors and perceptions that have an impact on NGRNs and their passage to becoming competent professional nurses. The overall aim was to reconceptualize the approach to NGRN transition and develop new frameworks or perspectives.

Methods

This study used an integrative review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The CINAHL, PsycInfo, Google Scholar, and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies published in English in an academic journal between 2015 and 2021. Eligible studies were categorized conceptually in accordance within a recognized framework for integrative reviews.

Results

A total of 41 studies were included in the review. This review found that healthcare organizations are primarily solipsistic and provision of consistent quality support, or any support at all, for NGRNs was not assured. As a consequence, purposive psychosocial preparation of nursing students for self-support during transition is needed.

Conclusion

An intense focus on psychosocial preparation of nursing students in order to scaffold the transition to practice experience and thus ensure patient safety is advocated. Proposals for change are recommended at the undergraduate level, which includes comprehensive curriculum development in both theory and practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响新毕业注册护士及其成为合格专业护士的社会心理因素:一项综合综述
卫生服务主要通过专门的过渡项目为新毕业注册护士(ngrn)提供就业机会。然而,研究结果继续表明,这些项目在提供支持性环境方面大多适得其反。因此,毕业生的健康和病人的安全往往处于危险之中。目的:本综合综述的具体目的是回顾、批判和综合现有文献,这些文献涉及影响ngrn及其成为合格专业护士的各种因素和观念。总体目标是重新定义NGRN过渡的方法,并开发新的框架或观点。方法本研究采用了定性、定量和混合方法研究的综合评价,采用了系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南和麦吉尔混合方法评价工具的首选报告项目。检索CINAHL、PsycInfo、Google Scholar和Ovid MEDLINE数据库,检索2015年至2021年间发表在学术期刊上的相关定量、定性和混合方法研究。符合条件的研究在概念上按照公认的综合评价框架进行分类。结果共纳入41项研究。本综述发现,医疗机构主要是唯我论的,不能保证为ngrn提供一致的质量支持,或者根本不提供任何支持。因此,有目的的心理社会准备护理学生在过渡期间的自我支持是必要的。结论应加强护生的心理社会准备,为护生向实践经验的过渡奠定基础,从而确保患者安全。建议在本科阶段进行改革,其中包括理论和实践方面的综合课程开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Errata Highlights of the Nurse Licensure Compact Survey Findings: Nurses’ Needs, Experiences, and Views Ethical Decision-Making Among Nurses Participating in Social Media: A Grounded Theory Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1