Does Hair Strand Cause Failure of Sterilization? A Controlled Experimental Study

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM Pub Date : 2021-04-30 DOI:10.4274/JAREM.GALENOS.2021.3853
Nurgül Arpag, Suheyla Yazicioglu, Ayşenur Curabeyoğlu, Hamdiye Banu Katran, Sevgi Gür, Anıl Demiröz, Fatma Altınkılıç
{"title":"Does Hair Strand Cause Failure of Sterilization? A Controlled Experimental Study","authors":"Nurgül Arpag, Suheyla Yazicioglu, Ayşenur Curabeyoğlu, Hamdiye Banu Katran, Sevgi Gür, Anıl Demiröz, Fatma Altınkılıç","doi":"10.4274/JAREM.GALENOS.2021.3853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Besides the standard applications of surgical aseptic techniques, it is known that different teams display different approaches in the presence of a hair strand in sterile packs. Few of the teams prefer not to use the instruments and postpone the surgery, whereas others may decide to remove the hair and the instruments in contact and continue using the remaining part. Evidence is required to determine a standard approach in such practices, which leads to negative consequences. Methods: Overall, 108 surgical clamps were sterilised using autoclave (n=36), hydrogen peroxide (n=36), and ethylene oxide (n=36). One third of the instruments in each group were packed along with a free hair strand, another third with a strangulated hair strand, and the last third were packed alone as the control group. Microbiological specimens of the instruments were collected with swabs. Hair samples were inoculated on thioglycolate broth. Growth was evaluated after 24 and 48 hours. Results: No growth was observed among the groups after 24 and 48 hours. Thus, all the instruments were considered sterile. Conclusion: Hair was shown to have no significant effect as a biological burden on bacterial contamination risk.","PeriodicalId":56162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM","volume":"11 1","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/JAREM.GALENOS.2021.3853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Besides the standard applications of surgical aseptic techniques, it is known that different teams display different approaches in the presence of a hair strand in sterile packs. Few of the teams prefer not to use the instruments and postpone the surgery, whereas others may decide to remove the hair and the instruments in contact and continue using the remaining part. Evidence is required to determine a standard approach in such practices, which leads to negative consequences. Methods: Overall, 108 surgical clamps were sterilised using autoclave (n=36), hydrogen peroxide (n=36), and ethylene oxide (n=36). One third of the instruments in each group were packed along with a free hair strand, another third with a strangulated hair strand, and the last third were packed alone as the control group. Microbiological specimens of the instruments were collected with swabs. Hair samples were inoculated on thioglycolate broth. Growth was evaluated after 24 and 48 hours. Results: No growth was observed among the groups after 24 and 48 hours. Thus, all the instruments were considered sterile. Conclusion: Hair was shown to have no significant effect as a biological burden on bacterial contamination risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发丝会导致消毒失败吗?对照实验研究
目的:除了外科无菌技术的标准应用外,众所周知,不同的团队在无菌包中存在发束的情况下表现出不同的方法。很少有团队不愿意使用器械并推迟手术,而其他团队可能会决定移除头发和接触的器械,并继续使用剩余部分。需要证据来确定这种做法的标准方法,这会导致负面后果。方法:总共使用高压灭菌器(n=36)、过氧化氢(n=6)和环氧乙烷(n=3 6)对108个手术夹具进行消毒。每组三分之一的器械与游离发束一起包装,另三分之一与绞窄发束一起打包,最后三分之一单独包装作为对照组。用拭子采集仪器的微生物标本。将头发样本接种在巯基乙酸肉汤上。在24小时和48小时后评估生长。结果:24小时和48小时后,各组均未观察到生长。因此,所有的仪器都被认为是无菌的。结论:头发作为一种生物负担对细菌污染风险没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM
Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Relationship Between the Protrusion of the Optic Nerve and Internal Carotid Artery and Sphenoid Sinus Volume Would Women Who Have Been Informed About Automated Breast Ultrasound Prefer This Method to Manuel Ultrasound? Cyberchondria’s Possible Relationship with Problematic Internet Use and eHealth Literacy Prediction of Difficulty Level of Laparoscopic Cholecistectomy According to Preoperative Findings Synthesis of Graphene Oxide and Evaluation of Its Cytotoxic Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1