COMPETITION AND RATCHET HYPOTHESIS: HOW SAFE ARE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA?

O. Olowofela, Akanbi M. A Tonade, W. Sanyaolu
{"title":"COMPETITION AND RATCHET HYPOTHESIS: HOW SAFE ARE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA?","authors":"O. Olowofela, Akanbi M. A Tonade, W. Sanyaolu","doi":"10.32890/mmj2021.25.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study applied the conventional ratcheting notion that managers (agents) chose to restrict their performance because they anticipated that firms (principals) would respond to higher performance levels by raising targets or by cutting pay in a piece-rate labour environment. A cross-sectional panel model was developed to subject this baseline notion of ratcheting hypothesis to multi-period and ex-post competitive labour market environment, bearing in mind that there was information asymmetry to both parties. It was observed, as predicted by the theoretical model that there would be substantial ratchet effects in the absence of competition. However, when subjected to ex-post competition, the ratchet effects were reduced, regardless of whether market conditions favoured the firms or the managers and thereby making the manufacturing companies in Sub-Saharan Africa safer than when they were exposed to ratcheting in its conventional form.","PeriodicalId":34347,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Management Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2021.25.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study applied the conventional ratcheting notion that managers (agents) chose to restrict their performance because they anticipated that firms (principals) would respond to higher performance levels by raising targets or by cutting pay in a piece-rate labour environment. A cross-sectional panel model was developed to subject this baseline notion of ratcheting hypothesis to multi-period and ex-post competitive labour market environment, bearing in mind that there was information asymmetry to both parties. It was observed, as predicted by the theoretical model that there would be substantial ratchet effects in the absence of competition. However, when subjected to ex-post competition, the ratchet effects were reduced, regardless of whether market conditions favoured the firms or the managers and thereby making the manufacturing companies in Sub-Saharan Africa safer than when they were exposed to ratcheting in its conventional form.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞争与棘轮假说:撒哈拉以南非洲的制造业公司安全性如何?
这项研究应用了传统的渐进式概念,即经理(代理人)之所以选择限制自己的绩效,是因为他们预计公司(负责人)会通过提高目标或在计件工资的劳动力环境中减薪来应对更高的绩效水平。考虑到双方都存在信息不对称,开发了一个横断面面板模型,将棘轮假说的这一基线概念置于多时期和非竞争后的劳动力市场环境中。据观察,正如理论模型所预测的那样,在没有竞争的情况下会产生实质性的棘轮效应。然而,当受到事后竞争时,无论市场条件是有利于公司还是管理者,棘轮效应都会减少,从而使撒哈拉以南非洲的制造公司比传统形式的棘轮更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE AGILITY AND COMPASSIONATE LEADERSHIP OF THE NEXT NORMAL BUSINESS MODEL CANVAS AND SWOT ANALYSIS IN THE RECONSTRUCTION OF COMPETITIVE STRATEGY: A CASE STUDY VCI INDONESIA COMPANY EFFECTS OF EXTENDED VALUE CHAIN ACTIVITIES ON PROFIT EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIAN PLANTATION COMPANIES EFFECT OF SERENE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES IN MALAYSIA AFFORDABILITY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN NORTHERN REGION OF MALAYSIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1