The Arizona Republic and the Indianapolis Star: A Comparative Analysis of Content Changes After Purchase by Gannett

Q4 Social Sciences Journalism history Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00947679.2022.2161809
Jeanne S. Criswell, Robert H. Gobetz, F. E. May
{"title":"The Arizona Republic and the Indianapolis Star: A Comparative Analysis of Content Changes After Purchase by Gannett","authors":"Jeanne S. Criswell, Robert H. Gobetz, F. E. May","doi":"10.1080/00947679.2022.2161809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Gannett’s purchase of the Arizona Republic and the Indianapolis Star in 2000 created fertile and historically uncommon conditions for considering ownership’s impact on news coverage. This study provides quantitative evidence that a local newspaper’s quality before an ownership change substantially influences whether a new ownership model will have a positive, negative, or neutral effect. The two newspapers’ similar characteristics, shared ownership history, and simultaneous purchase undergird this study’s quantitative evidence and reduce the influence of variables that could account for inconsistencies in previous content analyses, including those specifically examining the effects of a Gannett purchase. In this case, Gannett ownership had a significantly more detrimental impact on the Republic than on the Star. The study also suggests implications for the USA Today Network and the evolutionary arc of commercial journalism, particularly in view of the Gannett and GateHouse merger.","PeriodicalId":38759,"journal":{"name":"Journalism history","volume":"49 1","pages":"61 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947679.2022.2161809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gannett’s purchase of the Arizona Republic and the Indianapolis Star in 2000 created fertile and historically uncommon conditions for considering ownership’s impact on news coverage. This study provides quantitative evidence that a local newspaper’s quality before an ownership change substantially influences whether a new ownership model will have a positive, negative, or neutral effect. The two newspapers’ similar characteristics, shared ownership history, and simultaneous purchase undergird this study’s quantitative evidence and reduce the influence of variables that could account for inconsistencies in previous content analyses, including those specifically examining the effects of a Gannett purchase. In this case, Gannett ownership had a significantly more detrimental impact on the Republic than on the Star. The study also suggests implications for the USA Today Network and the evolutionary arc of commercial journalism, particularly in view of the Gannett and GateHouse merger.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《亚利桑那共和国》和《印第安纳波利斯之星》:Gannett购买后内容变化的比较分析
摘要甘尼特于2000年收购了亚利桑那共和国和印第安纳波利斯之星,为考虑所有权对新闻报道的影响创造了丰富而罕见的条件。这项研究提供了定量证据,证明地方报纸在所有权变更前的质量会对新的所有权模式产生积极、消极或中性的影响。这两家报纸的相似特征、共同所有权历史和同时购买为本研究的定量证据提供了基础,并减少了可能导致先前内容分析不一致的变量的影响,包括那些专门研究Gannett购买影响的变量。在这种情况下,甘尼特的所有权对共和国的不利影响要比对明星队的不利影响大得多。这项研究还对《今日美国》网络和商业新闻的发展轨迹提出了启示,特别是考虑到甘尼特和盖特豪斯的合并。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journalism history
Journalism history Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Thelma Berlack Boozer: A “Forgotten First” at the School of Journalism at Lincoln University The Reagan Doctrine or “Sandinista Chic”? Political Balance in the Committee to Protect Journalists’ 1982 Mission to Central America What We Talk about When We Talk about Women: Benevolent Sexism in Historical Studies of Women Journalists, 1974–2023 The Black Arts Movement and the House of Ideas The Ad Agency and Ad Content in the 1840s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1