Women as Passive Citizens in Kant's Theory of Citizenship

IF 0.8 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Web Services Research Pub Date : 2020-09-23 DOI:10.33831/jws.v21i2.112
Serpil Durğun
{"title":"Women as Passive Citizens in Kant's Theory of Citizenship","authors":"Serpil Durğun","doi":"10.33831/jws.v21i2.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kant, who is one of the contractarian theorists in political philosophy, positions the person who has the right to vote and participates in the legislative process as a citizen. This positioning is directly related to Kant's attribution of citizenship to the independence precondition. For Kant, independence means that a person possesses a certain amount of ownership which enables him to sustain his life on his own. The person who owns a certain quantity of property is the master of himself as he will not receive orders from the others and will not need the protection of others. Positioning an independent person as an active citizen with political rights, Kant considers persons who are non-owners as passive citizens because they cannot meet the prerequisite for independence. Passive citizens who are deprived of all political rights are merely citizens of the state. According to Kant's argument, women can never move up to the active citizenship status, although the republic has cleared the way for the possibility that every member of the republic could eventually move up to the active citizenship status. The status of being man of property, which is a prerequisite for the independence criterion, loses all its functions when women are in question. Even if a woman is a property owner, this is still considered insufficient for the independence criterion. Kant bases this idea of him on the assumption of women's nature and the prenuptial agreement. \n ","PeriodicalId":54936,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Web Services Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Web Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v21i2.112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kant, who is one of the contractarian theorists in political philosophy, positions the person who has the right to vote and participates in the legislative process as a citizen. This positioning is directly related to Kant's attribution of citizenship to the independence precondition. For Kant, independence means that a person possesses a certain amount of ownership which enables him to sustain his life on his own. The person who owns a certain quantity of property is the master of himself as he will not receive orders from the others and will not need the protection of others. Positioning an independent person as an active citizen with political rights, Kant considers persons who are non-owners as passive citizens because they cannot meet the prerequisite for independence. Passive citizens who are deprived of all political rights are merely citizens of the state. According to Kant's argument, women can never move up to the active citizenship status, although the republic has cleared the way for the possibility that every member of the republic could eventually move up to the active citizenship status. The status of being man of property, which is a prerequisite for the independence criterion, loses all its functions when women are in question. Even if a woman is a property owner, this is still considered insufficient for the independence criterion. Kant bases this idea of him on the assumption of women's nature and the prenuptial agreement.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康德公民权理论中的女性被动公民
康德是政治哲学中的反传统理论家之一,他将有选举权和参与立法过程的人定位为公民。这一定位直接关系到康德将公民身份归属于独立的前提。对康德来说,独立意味着一个人拥有一定的所有权,使他能够独自维持自己的生活。拥有一定数量财产的人是自己的主人,因为他不会接受他人的命令,也不需要他人的保护。康德将一个独立的人定位为一个具有政治权利的积极公民,认为非所有人是被动公民,因为他们不能满足独立的先决条件。被剥夺所有政治权利的被动公民仅仅是国家的公民。根据康德的论点,尽管共和国已经为共和国的每个成员最终都有可能获得积极公民身份扫清了道路,但女性永远无法获得积极公民地位。作为独立标准的先决条件的有财产的男人的地位在妇女受到质疑时失去了所有功能。即使妇女是财产所有人,这仍然被认为不足以作为独立标准。康德的这一思想是建立在对女性本质和婚前协议的假设之上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Web Services Research
International Journal of Web Services Research 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Web Services Research (IJWSR) is the first refereed, international publication featuring the latest research findings and industry solutions involving all aspects of Web services technology. This journal covers advancements, standards, and practices of Web services, as well as identifies emerging research topics and defines the future of Web services on grid computing, multimedia, and communication. IJWSR provides an open, formal publication for high quality articles developed by theoreticians, educators, developers, researchers, and practitioners for those desiring to stay abreast of challenges in Web services technology.
期刊最新文献
A Quasi-Newton Matrix Factorization-Based Model for Recommendation A Service Recommendation Algorithm Based on Self-Attention Mechanism and DeepFM Secure Cloud Storage and Retrieval of Personal Health Data From Smart Wearable Devices With Privacy-Preserving Techniques User Interaction Within Online Innovation Communities Research on a New Reconstruction Technology and Evaluation Method for 3D Digital Core Pore Structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1