Development of an assessment tool for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy using the Delphi method

Yujiro Nakayama, Hidetaka Kawamura, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Yukitoshi Todate, R. Matsunaga, T. Miyakawa, M. Honda
{"title":"Development of an assessment tool for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy using the Delphi method","authors":"Yujiro Nakayama, Hidetaka Kawamura, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Yukitoshi Todate, R. Matsunaga, T. Miyakawa, M. Honda","doi":"10.4993/acrt.28.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several tools to assess surgeons’ skills in laparoscopic surgeries have developed; nevertheless, the tools have not been developed to accommodate the Japanese guidelines and common surgical methods. Trainee surgeons would then not be able to learn the critical steps and important points of LCS procedures using the assessment tool. To fill the gap, we launched the “Development of an Assessment tool for Laparoscopic Colectomy” (ASLAC) project to develop a reliable tool to assess laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. The study consisted of two steps: cognitive task analysis (CTA) and application of the Delphi method. Consensus was defined in advance using Cronbach’s alpha ≥0.8. Items for which 70% of experts cited a value of ≥4 (agree or strongly agree) were used as novel tool. Ten expert surgeons (considered “qualified surgeons” by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System in Japan) were recruited. The mean number of years post-graduation was 26 (range, 19– 32 years). The median number of LCS cases performed by the experts was 700 (range, 219–2700). Our scale consisted of 35 items. Cronbach’s alphas of the 1 and 2 rounds were calculated to be 0.85 and 0.81, respectively. All ten experts answered the first round and 20 items were excluded. The second round was answered by all experts and no items were deleted. Our new scale may be applicable in future clinical studies evaluating surgical skills in LCS.","PeriodicalId":35647,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4993/acrt.28.137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Several tools to assess surgeons’ skills in laparoscopic surgeries have developed; nevertheless, the tools have not been developed to accommodate the Japanese guidelines and common surgical methods. Trainee surgeons would then not be able to learn the critical steps and important points of LCS procedures using the assessment tool. To fill the gap, we launched the “Development of an Assessment tool for Laparoscopic Colectomy” (ASLAC) project to develop a reliable tool to assess laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. The study consisted of two steps: cognitive task analysis (CTA) and application of the Delphi method. Consensus was defined in advance using Cronbach’s alpha ≥0.8. Items for which 70% of experts cited a value of ≥4 (agree or strongly agree) were used as novel tool. Ten expert surgeons (considered “qualified surgeons” by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System in Japan) were recruited. The mean number of years post-graduation was 26 (range, 19– 32 years). The median number of LCS cases performed by the experts was 700 (range, 219–2700). Our scale consisted of 35 items. Cronbach’s alphas of the 1 and 2 rounds were calculated to be 0.85 and 0.81, respectively. All ten experts answered the first round and 20 items were excluded. The second round was answered by all experts and no items were deleted. Our new scale may be applicable in future clinical studies evaluating surgical skills in LCS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用德尔菲法的腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术评估工具的开发
已经开发了几种评估外科医生腹腔镜手术技能的工具;然而,这些工具还没有发展到适应日本的指导方针和常见的手术方法。实习外科医生将无法使用评估工具学习LCS手术的关键步骤和要点。为了填补这一空白,我们启动了“腹腔镜结肠切除术评估工具的开发”(ASLAC)项目,开发一种可靠的评估腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的工具。研究分为两个步骤:认知任务分析(CTA)和德尔菲法的应用。采用Cronbach 's alpha≥0.8预先定义共识。70%的专家引用值≥4(同意或强烈同意)的项目被用作新工具。招募了10名专家外科医生(日本内窥镜手术技能资格体系认定为“合格外科医生”)。毕业后平均学龄26年(范围19 - 32年)。专家完成的LCS病例中位数为700例(范围219-2700)。我们的量表由35个项目组成。计算第1轮和第2轮的Cronbach 's alpha分别为0.85和0.81。10名专家全部回答了第一轮问题,20个问题被排除在外。第二轮由所有专家回答,没有项目被删除。我们的新量表可能适用于未来的临床研究,评估LCS的手术技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy
Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Association of Various Viral Infections with the Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancers in the Iranian Population Beta Catenin Expression in Colorectal Carcinoma and its relation to survival and prognostic factors Are Breast Cancer Awareness Campaigns Missing the Mark: Pakistan's Perspective Association between perforated peptic ulcers, human leukocyteantigen-restricted human endogenous retrovirus gene-derived peptides, and carcinogenesis after acid-suppressive therapy Comparison of the impact and quality of life of breast and lung cancer survivors in the medium-term
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1