David Copperfield, Émile, and the Legacy of Enlightenment Education Literature

IF 0.7 1区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES DICKENS QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.1353/dqt.2023.0000
Benjamin D. O'Dell, James Armstrong, Kathryne Ford, Lanya Lamouria, J. Parrott, D. Rainsford, T. Wagner, Robert Sirabian, M. Allen-Emerson
{"title":"David Copperfield, Émile, and the Legacy of Enlightenment Education Literature","authors":"Benjamin D. O'Dell, James Armstrong, Kathryne Ford, Lanya Lamouria, J. Parrott, D. Rainsford, T. Wagner, Robert Sirabian, M. Allen-Emerson","doi":"10.1353/dqt.2023.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The Bildungsroman is a genre concerned with the construction of the individual's relationship with society. Critics have often associated Victorian Bildungsromane with the loss of agency as ideological forces funnel literary characters (and, by extension, their readers) through a series of conventional plot points designed to reinforce a fairly conservative set of middle-class values. This essay complicates such readings by pairing Charles Dickens's paradigmatic Victorian Bildungsroman David Copperfield (1850) with Jean-Jacques Rousseau's progenitor to the genre, Émile (1762). I suggest that setting Dickens's novel against the more philosophically dense and overtly confrontational Émile highlights David Copperfield's vexed relationship with established social codes, supplying the foundation for an important reconsideration of the Bildungsroman's role in subject formation.","PeriodicalId":41747,"journal":{"name":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","volume":"40 1","pages":"107 - 108 - 112 - 112 - 116 - 116 - 121 - 127 - 130 - 27 - 28 - 3 - 4 - 44 - 45 - 5 - 63 - 64 - 7 -"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dqt.2023.0000","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The Bildungsroman is a genre concerned with the construction of the individual's relationship with society. Critics have often associated Victorian Bildungsromane with the loss of agency as ideological forces funnel literary characters (and, by extension, their readers) through a series of conventional plot points designed to reinforce a fairly conservative set of middle-class values. This essay complicates such readings by pairing Charles Dickens's paradigmatic Victorian Bildungsroman David Copperfield (1850) with Jean-Jacques Rousseau's progenitor to the genre, Émile (1762). I suggest that setting Dickens's novel against the more philosophically dense and overtly confrontational Émile highlights David Copperfield's vexed relationship with established social codes, supplying the foundation for an important reconsideration of the Bildungsroman's role in subject formation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大卫·科波菲尔、埃米尔与启蒙教育文学的遗产
摘要:成长小说是一种关注个人与社会关系建构的文学体裁。评论家们经常将维多利亚时代的成长小说与主体的丧失联系在一起,因为意识形态的力量通过一系列旨在强化一套相当保守的中产阶级价值观的传统情节点来引导文学人物(以及他们的读者)。本文将查尔斯·狄更斯的维多利亚时代典型成长小说《大卫·科波菲尔》(1850)与让-雅克·卢梭的成长小说的鼻祖Émile(1762)结合起来,使这种阅读变得复杂。我认为,把狄更斯的小说与哲学上更为密集和公然对抗的Émile对立起来,凸显了大卫·科波菲尔与既定社会规范之间令人烦恼的关系,为重新思考成长小说在主题形成中的作用提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DICKENS QUARTERLY
DICKENS QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Dickens's Mudfog Charles Dickens and Georgina Hogarth: A Curious and Enduring Relationship by Christine Skelton (review) Writing to Control the Narrative: Charles Dickens, PTSD, and the Staplehurst Rail Crash The Year that Shaped the Victorian Age: Lives, Loves and Letters of 1845 by Michael Wheeler (review) The Dickens Checklist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1