A New Halberd Typology (1500-1800): Based on the Collection of the National Military Museum, The Netherlands

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Arms & Armour Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17416124.2020.1728905
C. V. Van Dijk
{"title":"A New Halberd Typology (1500-1800): Based on the Collection of the National Military Museum, The Netherlands","authors":"C. V. Van Dijk","doi":"10.1080/17416124.2020.1728905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European halberds as the subject of research has been partly neglected in mainstream historical academic discourses. The research that has been primarily focused on trends in development of halberd design from the 14th to the 18th century. However, this research does not provide insight into the large variety of halberd design present in collections around the world. To examine this variety, this article offers a classification system for halberds and provides insight into the factors influencing their design during the 16th and 17th centuries. The first part of the article presents a halberd typology based on the collection of 131 examples in the National Military Museum, the Netherlands, to provide a system to classify and simplify communication. This typology is based on a hierarchical system, from classes, based on the design of the point and socket of the halberd, to types and subtypes, based on the blade and beak design. In total 4 classes, 14 types and 5 subtypes could be recognised. The second part of the article provides insight into the dating and use of the recognised types based on art and historical texts. Using this method, a trend could be recognised in halberd design: straight-edged halberds were presumably being used by larger groups of individuals, for example during battles. While concave edged halberds were probably used by smaller groups, for example personal guards, and were designed to control the opponent’s weapon and inflict trauma primarily with the point.","PeriodicalId":40914,"journal":{"name":"Arms & Armour","volume":"17 1","pages":"1 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17416124.2020.1728905","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arms & Armour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17416124.2020.1728905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European halberds as the subject of research has been partly neglected in mainstream historical academic discourses. The research that has been primarily focused on trends in development of halberd design from the 14th to the 18th century. However, this research does not provide insight into the large variety of halberd design present in collections around the world. To examine this variety, this article offers a classification system for halberds and provides insight into the factors influencing their design during the 16th and 17th centuries. The first part of the article presents a halberd typology based on the collection of 131 examples in the National Military Museum, the Netherlands, to provide a system to classify and simplify communication. This typology is based on a hierarchical system, from classes, based on the design of the point and socket of the halberd, to types and subtypes, based on the blade and beak design. In total 4 classes, 14 types and 5 subtypes could be recognised. The second part of the article provides insight into the dating and use of the recognised types based on art and historical texts. Using this method, a trend could be recognised in halberd design: straight-edged halberds were presumably being used by larger groups of individuals, for example during battles. While concave edged halberds were probably used by smaller groups, for example personal guards, and were designed to control the opponent’s weapon and inflict trauma primarily with the point.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新的戟类学(1500-1800):基于荷兰国家军事博物馆收藏
欧洲戟作为研究的主题,在主流历史学术话语中被部分忽视。这项研究主要集中在14世纪到18世纪戟设计的发展趋势上。然而,这项研究并没有深入了解世界各地收藏品中存在的各种戟设计。为了研究这种多样性,本文提供了戟的分类系统,并提供了16和17世纪影响戟设计的因素的见解。文章的第一部分基于荷兰国家军事博物馆131件藏品的戟类型学,提供了一个分类和简化交流的系统。这种类型学是基于一个等级系统,从基于戟尖和套孔设计的类,到基于刃和喙设计的类型和子类型。共可识别4类14型5亚型。文章的第二部分提供了基于艺术和历史文本的公认类型的日期和使用的见解。使用这种方法,可以在戟设计中发现一种趋势:直刃戟可能是由较大的个人群体使用的,例如在战斗中。虽然凹刃戟可能是由较小的群体使用,例如私人警卫,其设计目的是控制对手的武器,主要是用剑尖造成创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arms & Armour
Arms & Armour MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Accelerator guns: from ‘Cannon Perreaux’ to V.3 Up is down: some hypotheses on how to interpret perspective in MS I.33’s illustrations Abraham Charles Kirkmann, lawyer and antiquary; and the rediscovery of the Bosworth stonebow at Browsholme Hall Update: Martini-type rifle production in Afghanistan A Cultural History of the Medieval Sword: Power, Piety and Play
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1