The War Damage on Archaeological Heritage after the War: Archaeological Heritage and Landmines

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites Pub Date : 2020-03-03 DOI:10.1080/13505033.2021.1923628
Neda Kulenović, Igor Kulenović, Filomena Sirovica
{"title":"The War Damage on Archaeological Heritage after the War: Archaeological Heritage and Landmines","authors":"Neda Kulenović, Igor Kulenović, Filomena Sirovica","doi":"10.1080/13505033.2021.1923628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT War is an invasive spatial practice and naturally, these practices are detrimental for archaeological heritage. However, a form of war-related damage to archaeological heritage is hitherto unrecognised. This paper represents a first attempt to define, quantify and estimate the extent of war damage to archaeological heritage caused by deployment, placement and removal of landmines and various other explosive remnants of war (ERW). Three case studies from Croatia each demonstrate that estimated figures are staggering and that archaeological heritage is indeed gravely affected. We suggest that adequate reaction from various stakeholders is missing. This is unfortunate because the case studies also demonstrate that the loss of archaeological potential could be mitigated and controlled. Deployment and removal of explosive devices are activities which must be recognised managed as a form of war damage. Archaeological community should take a keener interest in the subject and become a relevant stakeholder in mine action.","PeriodicalId":44482,"journal":{"name":"Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13505033.2021.1923628","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2021.1923628","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT War is an invasive spatial practice and naturally, these practices are detrimental for archaeological heritage. However, a form of war-related damage to archaeological heritage is hitherto unrecognised. This paper represents a first attempt to define, quantify and estimate the extent of war damage to archaeological heritage caused by deployment, placement and removal of landmines and various other explosive remnants of war (ERW). Three case studies from Croatia each demonstrate that estimated figures are staggering and that archaeological heritage is indeed gravely affected. We suggest that adequate reaction from various stakeholders is missing. This is unfortunate because the case studies also demonstrate that the loss of archaeological potential could be mitigated and controlled. Deployment and removal of explosive devices are activities which must be recognised managed as a form of war damage. Archaeological community should take a keener interest in the subject and become a relevant stakeholder in mine action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战后考古遗产的战争损害:考古遗产与地雷
摘要战争是一种侵入性的空间实践,自然地,这些实践对考古遗产是有害的。然而,一种与战争有关的对考古遗产的破坏形式迄今尚未得到承认。本文首次尝试定义、量化和估计地雷和各种其他战争遗留爆炸物的部署、放置和清除对考古遗产造成的战争破坏程度。克罗地亚的三个案例研究都表明,估计数字令人震惊,考古遗产确实受到了严重影响。我们认为,各利益攸关方缺乏充分的反应。这是不幸的,因为案例研究也表明,考古潜力的丧失是可以减轻和控制的。爆炸装置的部署和拆除是必须被视为战争破坏形式进行管理的活动。考古界应该对这一主题更加感兴趣,并成为排雷行动的相关利益攸关方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The journal Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites (CMAS) has established itself as the primary reference in this field, both for active professionals and for university teachers and students. Launched in 1995, it is the only journal that covers both theoretical and practical issues in heritage site management and conservation. Peer-reviewed papers from around the world report on new thinking and best practice in site management and conservation. Topics covered include: •Cultural, social, ethical and theoretical issues in archaeological site management and conservation •Site management •Historical documentation and condition reporting •Site deterioration and environmental monitoring •Preventative conservation, including reburial and protective sheltering of sites •Building materials analysis and treatment •Restoration and reconstruction of buildings •Visitor management and sustainable tourism •Site interpretation •National and international legislation and charters
期刊最新文献
Historical Irrigation Landscape Systems: Introducing Conservation, Management, and Reuse Experiences and Studies in Rural and Urban Contexts Editorial Introduction Irrigation: Qualities, Drawbacks, and Comparisons (In)adequacies of Heritage Conservation and Management: Socio-Spatial Contestations of the Piedmont-Scrublands, Ramanadi Basin, Tamirabarani Productive Landscape Ancestral Integrated Water Management Systems as Adaptation Tools for Climate Change: The “Acequias De Careo” and Historical Water Management of the Mecina River in Sierra Nevada (Granada, Spain)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1