Comparison of regional arterial chemotherapy and systemic intravenous chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cheng Li, Wenyi Guo, Shihong Chen, Jianwei Xu, Feng Li, Lei Wang
{"title":"Comparison of regional arterial chemotherapy and systemic intravenous chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Cheng Li, Wenyi Guo, Shihong Chen, Jianwei Xu, Feng Li, Lei Wang","doi":"10.1097/JP9.0000000000000092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (stage III/IV). However, conventional systemic intravenous chemotherapy (SIC) has been unsatisfactory for pancreatic cancer. In recent years, regional arterial infusion chemotherapy (RAIC) has been clinically used as a new chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, but its efficacy is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of RAIC. We searched literatures in databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI. After screening, this meta-analysis finally included 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 444 patients (230 RAIC and 214 SIC). We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess risk of bias for included RCTs. Outcomes were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), adverse events rate (AER), and pain remission rate. Outcome indicators used relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) as effect analysis statistics. The results showed that RAIC had some advantages over SIC in terms of ORR, OS, incidence of leukopenia, and pain remission. In conclusion, compared with SIC, RAIC has better clinical efficacy and lower toxicity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.","PeriodicalId":92925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pancreatology","volume":"5 1","pages":"49 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JP9.0000000000000092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (stage III/IV). However, conventional systemic intravenous chemotherapy (SIC) has been unsatisfactory for pancreatic cancer. In recent years, regional arterial infusion chemotherapy (RAIC) has been clinically used as a new chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, but its efficacy is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of RAIC. We searched literatures in databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI. After screening, this meta-analysis finally included 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 444 patients (230 RAIC and 214 SIC). We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess risk of bias for included RCTs. Outcomes were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), adverse events rate (AER), and pain remission rate. Outcome indicators used relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) as effect analysis statistics. The results showed that RAIC had some advantages over SIC in terms of ORR, OS, incidence of leukopenia, and pain remission. In conclusion, compared with SIC, RAIC has better clinical efficacy and lower toxicity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域动脉化疗与全身静脉化疗治疗晚期癌症的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析
化疗是晚期胰腺癌(III/IV期)的主要治疗方法。然而,传统的全身静脉化疗(SIC)对胰腺癌的治疗效果并不理想。近年来,局部动脉输注化疗(RAIC)作为一种新的化疗方案被临床应用于晚期胰腺癌的治疗,但其疗效存在争议。本研究的目的是评价RAIC的临床疗效和安全性。我们在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI等数据库中检索文献。筛选后,该荟萃分析最终纳入9项随机对照试验(rct),共444例患者(230例RAIC和214例SIC)。我们使用Cochrane风险偏倚2.0工具评估纳入的随机对照试验的偏倚风险。结果包括总生存期(OS)、总缓解率(ORR)、不良事件发生率(AER)和疼痛缓解率。结局指标采用相对危险度(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)作为效果分析统计。结果显示,RAIC在ORR、OS、白细胞减少发生率和疼痛缓解方面优于SIC。综上所述,与SIC相比,RAIC治疗晚期胰腺癌具有更好的临床疗效和更低的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reappraisal of the Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Chinese High-volume Center Experience Phase angle is an indicator of GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition in patients undergoing major pancreatic and biliary surgery: a cross-sectional study Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Urinastatin combined with octreotide versus sole octreotide in severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing to construct a CD8 + T cell-related immune gene signature in pancreatic cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1