A Decade of Scuba Effort Reevaluates Approach for Surveying White Abalone (Haliotis sorenseni Bartsch, 1940)

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES Journal of Shellfish Research Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI:10.2983/035.042.0111
A. Obaza, Amanda Bird, D. Witting, Bill Hagey, M. Neuman
{"title":"A Decade of Scuba Effort Reevaluates Approach for Surveying White Abalone (Haliotis sorenseni Bartsch, 1940)","authors":"A. Obaza, Amanda Bird, D. Witting, Bill Hagey, M. Neuman","doi":"10.2983/035.042.0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Accurate distribution and density data of endangered marine species may be complicated by artifacts from exploitation, survey design, and general difficulty in accessing subtidal habitats. Occasional review of survey data may help restructure survey efforts to improve conservation outcomes. The white abalone (Haliotis sorenseni) is a marine gastropod listed under the Endangered Species Act thought to primarily inhabit depths beyond conventional scientific SCUBA limits (30–60 m) in the southern California Channel Islands. This study reviews surveys at four Channel Islands and four locations along the southern California mainland coast within SCUBA depth ranges and conducts a simulation comparison of the larger survey design used for this study with the standard transect approach presently common in the region. White abalone density was greater along the mainland, particularly in Point Loma and La Jolla, than the Channel Islands, where no live white abalone were recorded. The larger survey approach was found to be more effective at finding simulated white abalone, beyond the expected difference in areal coverage alone. These results show that surveys within SCUBA limits are an effective way to monitor H. sorenseni and that impacts from overfishing on the Channel Islands may make sections of the mainland coast one of the last refuges of white abalone. The greater efficiency of larger surveys can complement standard transect approaches to improve abalone monitoring at sites of interest. Both results can be applied to the immediate conservation of white abalone by improving site selection and monitoring approaches to active restoration efforts.","PeriodicalId":50053,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shellfish Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shellfish Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2983/035.042.0111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate distribution and density data of endangered marine species may be complicated by artifacts from exploitation, survey design, and general difficulty in accessing subtidal habitats. Occasional review of survey data may help restructure survey efforts to improve conservation outcomes. The white abalone (Haliotis sorenseni) is a marine gastropod listed under the Endangered Species Act thought to primarily inhabit depths beyond conventional scientific SCUBA limits (30–60 m) in the southern California Channel Islands. This study reviews surveys at four Channel Islands and four locations along the southern California mainland coast within SCUBA depth ranges and conducts a simulation comparison of the larger survey design used for this study with the standard transect approach presently common in the region. White abalone density was greater along the mainland, particularly in Point Loma and La Jolla, than the Channel Islands, where no live white abalone were recorded. The larger survey approach was found to be more effective at finding simulated white abalone, beyond the expected difference in areal coverage alone. These results show that surveys within SCUBA limits are an effective way to monitor H. sorenseni and that impacts from overfishing on the Channel Islands may make sections of the mainland coast one of the last refuges of white abalone. The greater efficiency of larger surveys can complement standard transect approaches to improve abalone monitoring at sites of interest. Both results can be applied to the immediate conservation of white abalone by improving site selection and monitoring approaches to active restoration efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十年的潜水努力重新评估测量白鲍鱼的方法(halotis sorenseni Bartsch, 1940)
摘要濒危海洋物种的准确分布和密度数据可能会因开采、调查设计和进入潮下栖息地的普遍困难而变得复杂。偶尔审查调查数据可能有助于调整调查工作,以改善保护结果。白鲍鱼(Haliotis sorenseni)是一种根据《濒危物种法》列出的海洋腹足纲动物,被认为主要栖息在南加州海峡群岛超出传统科学SCUBA限制的深度(30-60米)。本研究回顾了SCUBA深度范围内四个海峡群岛和加利福尼亚州南部大陆海岸四个地点的调查,并对本研究中使用的较大调查设计与该地区目前常见的标准样带方法进行了模拟比较。大陆沿岸的白鲍鱼密度更大,尤其是在洛马角和拉霍亚岛,而海峡群岛没有记录到活的白鲍鱼。更大的调查方法被发现在寻找模拟白鲍鱼方面更有效,超过了仅面积覆盖率的预期差异。这些结果表明,在SCUBA范围内进行调查是监测H.sorenseni的有效方法,海峡群岛过度捕捞的影响可能使大陆海岸部分地区成为白鲍鱼的最后避难所之一。更大规模调查的效率更高,可以补充标准样带方法,以改善感兴趣地点的鲍鱼监测。这两个结果都可以通过改进现场选择和监测方法,积极开展恢复工作,应用于白鲍鱼的即时保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Shellfish Research
Journal of Shellfish Research 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Original articles dealing with all aspects of shellfish research will be considered for publication. Manuscripts will be judged by the editors or other competent reviewers, or both, on the basis of originality, content, merit, clarity of presentation, and interpretations.
期刊最新文献
A Past, Present, and Future Outlook on the Mississippi Oyster Fishery Life Cycle and Natural Mortality Rates of the Blue Spiny Lobster (Panulirus inflatus) Shell Growth of Pacific Razor Clams (Siliqua patula) in Cook Inlet, Alaska, USA Complementary DNA Cloning and Tissue Expression Profile of Chaperonin-Containing T-Complex Polypeptide 1-Beta in Pinctada maxima Exposed to Cold Stress Determination of the Tetramine Distribution in Marine Gastropods in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1