Turning the Tables: Derrida, China, and the Asia Turn

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM Pub Date : 2022-04-05 DOI:10.1353/dia.2021.0004
C. Rojas
{"title":"Turning the Tables: Derrida, China, and the Asia Turn","authors":"C. Rojas","doi":"10.1353/dia.2021.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:After a discussion of how Jacques Derrida’s Of Grammatology and Specters of Marx illustrate two inverse ways in which the figure of China has been marginalized within Western critical theory, this essay considers a contemporary counter-discourse developed by Asia-based theorists who use an approach dubbed “China/Asia as method” to critique the universalizing assumptions found in Western theory. Beginning with Takeuchi Yoshimi’s 1960 article “Asia as Method,” I suggest that this approach effectively turns the tables not only on a Eurocentric intellectual tradition itself, but also on concomitant attempts to use China/Asia as a space of radical alterity from which to critique the presumptive universality of Eurocentric discourses. I consider two recent analyses that draw (either explicitly or implicitly) on the “China/Asia as method” approach and apply it to contemporary debates over LGBTQ rights in Sinophone East Asia. Finally, I use a set of spectral resonances in the two Asian LGBTQ case studies to return to Derrida’s allusions to China and “table-turning” séances, but with a twist.","PeriodicalId":46840,"journal":{"name":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","volume":"49 1","pages":"105 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2021.0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:After a discussion of how Jacques Derrida’s Of Grammatology and Specters of Marx illustrate two inverse ways in which the figure of China has been marginalized within Western critical theory, this essay considers a contemporary counter-discourse developed by Asia-based theorists who use an approach dubbed “China/Asia as method” to critique the universalizing assumptions found in Western theory. Beginning with Takeuchi Yoshimi’s 1960 article “Asia as Method,” I suggest that this approach effectively turns the tables not only on a Eurocentric intellectual tradition itself, but also on concomitant attempts to use China/Asia as a space of radical alterity from which to critique the presumptive universality of Eurocentric discourses. I consider two recent analyses that draw (either explicitly or implicitly) on the “China/Asia as method” approach and apply it to contemporary debates over LGBTQ rights in Sinophone East Asia. Finally, I use a set of spectral resonances in the two Asian LGBTQ case studies to return to Derrida’s allusions to China and “table-turning” séances, but with a twist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扭转局面:德里达、中国和亚洲的转向
文摘:在讨论了德里达的《语法学》和马克思的《斯佩克特》如何阐释中国形象在西方批判理论中被边缘化的两种相反方式后,本文考虑了一种由亚洲理论家发展起来的当代反话语,他们使用一种被称为“中国/亚洲作为方法”的方法来批评西方理论中的普遍性假设。从竹内义美1960年的文章《亚洲作为方法》开始,我认为这种方法不仅有效地扭转了以欧洲为中心的知识传统本身的局面,而且也扭转了将中国/亚洲作为一个激进的交替空间来批判以欧洲为心论的假定普遍性的随之而来的尝试。我考虑了最近的两项分析,这两项分析(明确或隐含地)借鉴了“中国/亚洲作为方法”的方法,并将其应用于华话东亚关于LGBTQ权利的当代辩论。最后,我在两个亚洲LGBTQ案例研究中使用了一组光谱共振,回到德里达对中国和“扭转局面”的暗示,但有点扭曲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over thirty years, diacritics has been an exceptional and influential forum for scholars writing on the problems of literary criticism. Each issue features articles in which contributors compare and analyze books on particular theoretical works and develop their own positions on the theses, methods, and theoretical implications of those works.
期刊最新文献
Heidegger Tonight: A Philosophical Dialogue Fascination With The Obscure: An Interview With Peter Trawny Rethinking Authenticity, Anarchy, and Collective Action: An Interview with Peg Birmingham Object-Oriented Heidegger: An Interview with Graham Harman Crossroads in the Flesh: An Interview with Mariana Ortega
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1