The 2.0 Critic: Blended Discourses in Blogging

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Latin American Business Review Pub Date : 2019-03-11 DOI:10.1080/10978526.2019.1578178
Nathalia Dib Silva, R. D. Campos
{"title":"The 2.0 Critic: Blended Discourses in Blogging","authors":"Nathalia Dib Silva, R. D. Campos","doi":"10.1080/10978526.2019.1578178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although traditional critics remain a reliable source, they are losing influence to online reviews produced by technology-empowered consumers. This study aims to analyze this new form of critic that have emerged with Web 2.0 and who post technical reviews based on personal experiences. We conducted a qualitative study, following netnographic and content analysis protocols in a case study of the Brazilian blog 2Beauty.com.br, which has product reviews as core content. As a contribution, we define the 2.0 Critic and its composed narrative forms—Friend, Salesperson, Connoisseur, Hacker and Examiner—which point to an expert alternative position in the ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":35384,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10978526.2019.1578178","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2019.1578178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Although traditional critics remain a reliable source, they are losing influence to online reviews produced by technology-empowered consumers. This study aims to analyze this new form of critic that have emerged with Web 2.0 and who post technical reviews based on personal experiences. We conducted a qualitative study, following netnographic and content analysis protocols in a case study of the Brazilian blog 2Beauty.com.br, which has product reviews as core content. As a contribution, we define the 2.0 Critic and its composed narrative forms—Friend, Salesperson, Connoisseur, Hacker and Examiner—which point to an expert alternative position in the ecosystem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2.0评论家:博客中的混合话语
摘要尽管传统评论家仍然是一个可靠的来源,但他们正在失去对技术授权消费者产生的在线评论的影响力。本研究旨在分析Web2.0中出现的这种新形式的评论家,他们根据个人经历发布技术评论。在巴西博客2Beauty.combr的案例研究中,我们根据网络图和内容分析协议进行了一项定性研究,该博客以产品评论为核心内容。作为一种贡献,我们定义了2.0评论家及其组成的叙事形式——朋友、推销员、鉴赏家、黑客和审查者——它们指向了生态系统中的专家替代位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Latin American Business Review
Latin American Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Latin American Business Review is a quarterly, refereed journal which facilitates the exchange of information and new ideas between academics, business practitioners, public policymakers, and those in the international development community. Special features of the journal will keep you current on various teaching, research, and information sources. These activities all focus on the business and economic environment of the diverse and dynamic countries of the Americas.
期刊最新文献
Liability of Foreignness in Metals and Mining Companies in Brazil Profiles of Value Chains and Innovative and Organizational Performance in Microenterprises in Southern Ecuador Measuring Solvency Risk Using Flexible Distributions: An Analysis for the Colombian Banking System Brazilian Fiscal Policy and Its Procyclical Nature: A Long-Term Analysis Recent Management Accounting Literature: Bibliometric Analysis and Contributions from Latin America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1