Selected aspects of nursing practice related to the usage of evaluation tools for population aged over 60 years

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING Kontakt Pub Date : 2021-11-05 DOI:10.32725/kont.2021.044
J. Dolezalová, V. Tóthová, J. Neugebauer
{"title":"Selected aspects of nursing practice related to the usage of evaluation tools for population aged over 60 years","authors":"J. Dolezalová, V. Tóthová, J. Neugebauer","doi":"10.32725/kont.2021.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The accuracy of evaluation tools is subject to several factors involving nurses. Two of these factors are the level of education and experience. These factors can significantly affect the instrument’s objectivity. In terms of providing quality and specific geriatric care, having objective evaluation tools and applying the results are essential. Objective: The research aimed to determine how nurse education and experience affect the objectivity of evaluation tools. Another aim was to determine how education and experience affected the assessment of selected areas. Methods: The research was conducted using a quantitative survey involving 501 nurses from the South Bohemian Region. The data was obtained using a non-standardized questionnaire that focused explicitly on the use of evaluation tools. Results: The results show that nurses with higher levels of education have more experience in using evaluation tools and consider the tools to be useful and effective. The same was confirmed for nurses who have more nursing experience. Conclusions: Evaluation tools are an essential part of the nursing process, and an emphasis should be placed on learning how to use these tools during nurse training. In the context of geriatric nursing, nurses need special education for the various geriatric specialties. This is also true for the use of geriatric evaluations. In clinical practice, it is necessary to use evaluation tools systematically, logically, and, above all, to implement the results into care plans.","PeriodicalId":17818,"journal":{"name":"Kontakt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kontakt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2021.044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The accuracy of evaluation tools is subject to several factors involving nurses. Two of these factors are the level of education and experience. These factors can significantly affect the instrument’s objectivity. In terms of providing quality and specific geriatric care, having objective evaluation tools and applying the results are essential. Objective: The research aimed to determine how nurse education and experience affect the objectivity of evaluation tools. Another aim was to determine how education and experience affected the assessment of selected areas. Methods: The research was conducted using a quantitative survey involving 501 nurses from the South Bohemian Region. The data was obtained using a non-standardized questionnaire that focused explicitly on the use of evaluation tools. Results: The results show that nurses with higher levels of education have more experience in using evaluation tools and consider the tools to be useful and effective. The same was confirmed for nurses who have more nursing experience. Conclusions: Evaluation tools are an essential part of the nursing process, and an emphasis should be placed on learning how to use these tools during nurse training. In the context of geriatric nursing, nurses need special education for the various geriatric specialties. This is also true for the use of geriatric evaluations. In clinical practice, it is necessary to use evaluation tools systematically, logically, and, above all, to implement the results into care plans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
60岁以上人口使用评估工具的护理实践选择方面
引言:评估工具的准确性取决于涉及护士的几个因素。其中两个因素是教育水平和经验。这些因素会严重影响文书的客观性。就提供高质量和特定的老年护理而言,拥有客观的评估工具并应用结果至关重要。目的:本研究旨在确定护士教育和经验如何影响评估工具的客观性。另一个目的是确定教育和经验如何影响对选定领域的评估。方法:对来自南波希米亚地区的501名护士进行定量调查。数据是使用非标准化问卷获得的,该问卷明确侧重于评估工具的使用。结果:研究结果表明,受过高等教育的护士在使用评估工具方面有更多的经验,并认为这些工具是有用和有效的。有更多护理经验的护士也证实了这一点。结论:评估工具是护理过程的重要组成部分,在护士培训中应重点学习如何使用这些工具。在老年护理的背景下,护士需要接受各种老年专业的特殊教育。老年评估的使用也是如此。在临床实践中,有必要系统地、合乎逻辑地使用评估工具,最重要的是,将结果纳入护理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kontakt
Kontakt Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles are published in two sections: 1. The nursing section focuses on the support of nursing via the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based peer reviewed findings. The section serves as a forum for the exchange of knowledge relating to the education of nurses, the exchange of knowledge and skills in clinical nursing, the development of nursing concepts and innovation in health policy. It deals with the legal and ethical issues, nurses'' views on patient safety, nursing activities in multicultural environments and progress in nursing practice. The main topic areas include: -Clinical nursing -Management in nursing -Evidence-based nursing -Multicultural nursing -Nursing ethics -Quality of life in illness 2. The social sciences in health section accepts contributions relating to any aspect of health from a broad perspective of the social sciences, including the medical impact on society. It also accepts contributions dealing with ethical issues in health care, risk management and the impact of political and economic conditions in the field of health. The aim of the articles is to develop understanding and to provide practical application of quantitative and qualitative research methods concerning the management, application or use of the research in health and social care. The main topic areas include: -Social determinants of health -Social work and health -Legal and economic issues concerning health -Ethical issues in social sciences and health
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial factors affecting women's satisfaction with birth Nutrition, functional independence, and sarcopenia in elderly men and women Patients' experience of single room isolation in hospitals: an integrative review Perceived functioning of the family system in professional foster families The impact of comorbidity burden and age on the health-related quality-of-life of individuals one year after COVID-19 pneumonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1