Assessment of Emergency Response Preparedness in Power Plant Using FEMA Method (Case Study: South Isfahan Power Plant)

Alireza Kazemian Talkhooncheh, Afarin Akhavan, G. Halvani
{"title":"Assessment of Emergency Response Preparedness in Power Plant Using FEMA Method (Case Study: South Isfahan Power Plant)","authors":"Alireza Kazemian Talkhooncheh, Afarin Akhavan, G. Halvani","doi":"10.18502/jehsd.v6i2.6540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to identify all activities to be sufficiently prepared for emergencies in the power plant industries using the method of the Federal Crisis Management Organization in the south Isfahan power plant. \nMaterials and Methods: In this research, a checklist tool of 117 questions in 9 sections based on the FEMA method has been used. Checklists were localized. To check the face and content validity of the checklists, the opinions of three technical experts were used, and to check the reliability of the research subjects, the test-retest test was used, and to measure the reliability of the checklists, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used with an emphasis on internal correlation. The obtained alpha coefficient was 0.76. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. \nResults: The results showed that the power plant preparedness for general emergencies is 77.5%, winter storms and extreme cold 80%, storm 73.33%, overheating 70%, chemical storage 88.57%, earthquake 65%, Fire and explosion is 87%, flood 63.33%, and lightning 92%. The highest level of preparedness with 92% was related to the lightning checklist and the lowest level of readiness with 63.33% was related to floods. \nConclusion: In general, despite the differences in the readiness of the power plant against various accidents, the average level of preparedness for all accidents is higher than average. However, a number of appropriate measures must be taken in each area and the level of preparedness must be increased in cases such as fires and explosions.","PeriodicalId":53380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jehsd.v6i2.6540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to identify all activities to be sufficiently prepared for emergencies in the power plant industries using the method of the Federal Crisis Management Organization in the south Isfahan power plant. Materials and Methods: In this research, a checklist tool of 117 questions in 9 sections based on the FEMA method has been used. Checklists were localized. To check the face and content validity of the checklists, the opinions of three technical experts were used, and to check the reliability of the research subjects, the test-retest test was used, and to measure the reliability of the checklists, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used with an emphasis on internal correlation. The obtained alpha coefficient was 0.76. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: The results showed that the power plant preparedness for general emergencies is 77.5%, winter storms and extreme cold 80%, storm 73.33%, overheating 70%, chemical storage 88.57%, earthquake 65%, Fire and explosion is 87%, flood 63.33%, and lightning 92%. The highest level of preparedness with 92% was related to the lightning checklist and the lowest level of readiness with 63.33% was related to floods. Conclusion: In general, despite the differences in the readiness of the power plant against various accidents, the average level of preparedness for all accidents is higher than average. However, a number of appropriate measures must be taken in each area and the level of preparedness must be increased in cases such as fires and explosions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于FEMA方法的电厂应急准备评估(以南伊斯法罕电厂为例)
引言:本研究的目的是利用联邦危机管理组织在伊斯法罕南部发电厂的方法,确定发电厂行业中为紧急情况做好充分准备的所有活动。材料和方法:在本研究中,使用了一个基于FEMA方法的9节117个问题的检查表工具。检查表已本地化。为了检查检查表的表面和内容的有效性,使用了三位技术专家的意见,为了检查研究对象的可靠性,使用了重测测试,并使用了Cronbachα系数来衡量检查表的可靠性,强调了内部相关性。所获得的α系数为0.76。使用SPSS软件对数据进行分析。结果:电厂对一般突发事件的准备率为77.5%,冬季风暴和极寒的准备率80%,风暴73.33%,过热70%,化学品储存88.57%,地震65%,火灾爆炸87%,洪水63.33%,雷电92%。最高级别的准备程度(92%)与雷电检查表有关,最低级别的准备水平(63.33%)与洪水有关。结论:总的来说,尽管发电厂对各种事故的准备程度存在差异,但对所有事故的平均准备水平都高于平均水平。然而,必须在每个地区采取一些适当措施,并在火灾和爆炸等情况下提高准备水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development
Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Induced by Occupational Inhalation Exposure to N2O, an Anesthetic Gas Assessing the Rate of Recyclable Plastic Wastes and Recycling Economic Value in Hospitals of Yazd in 2022 Application of Rodenticides for the Control of Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Iran: A Systematic Review of the Literature Determining Effective Factors Regarding Weather and Some Types of Air Pollutants in Seasonal Changes of PM10 Concentration Using Tree-Based Algorithms in Yazd City Investigating the Effects of Music and Temperature Changes on Heart Function and Human Error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1