{"title":"Book Reviews","authors":"April Miller, D. Schlenker","doi":"10.3828/comma.2019.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Black Sexual Economies: Race and Sex in a Culture of Capital capaciously acknowledges, Black sexuality studies is an established and proliferating inter-and transdisciplinary intellectual focus. The framework is central to the understanding that Black sexuality has historically been constructed, in an American context, as pathological and as a site of sexual panic. This insight has influenced and evolved traditional disciplines, fields, and departments, including Black studies. Where this anthology distinguishes itself is through its focus on the inextricable link between Black sexuality and the political and socioeconomic forces that regulate and discipline it. More specifically, the collection considers “the enduring link between capitalism and market and imagination and culture in its theories of black sexualities in ways that traditional scholarship on sexuality and race have refused or sublimated for the work of politics” (2–3). Some of the anthology’s essays adhere to labor and market analysis of Black sexualities in and under advanced capitalism more explicitly than others. Regardless of how clearly the essays coalesce around a shared conceptual preoccupation, all the topics explored are indeed challenging to status-quo politics. This is difficult work, which is one of the reasons why a Black feminist praxis of collaboration is so necessary. The collection, which identifies itself as a “critical race feminist project,” grew from workshops and a culminating 2013 conference organized by the Black Sexual Economies (BSE) Collective, a working group of eight scholars from seven US research institutions in the fields of law; African American and African diaspora studies; English; women’s, gender, and sexuality studies; film and media studies; history; American Studies; and the performing arts (1). These scholars—who met regularly on the Washington University campus for four years (from 2010 to 2013)—include project organizer and co-convener Adrienne D. Davis; co-convener Mireille MillerYoung; Marlon Bailey; Matt Richardson; Jeffrey McCune; Felice Blake; Xavier Livermon; and L.H. Stallings. The BSE Collective’s intention was to “serve as an incubator for the crafting of new paradigms for thinking about race, gender, sexuality, and class and the use of innovative interdisciplinary methodologies” (ix). The resulting collection","PeriodicalId":36616,"journal":{"name":"Comma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/comma.2019.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As Black Sexual Economies: Race and Sex in a Culture of Capital capaciously acknowledges, Black sexuality studies is an established and proliferating inter-and transdisciplinary intellectual focus. The framework is central to the understanding that Black sexuality has historically been constructed, in an American context, as pathological and as a site of sexual panic. This insight has influenced and evolved traditional disciplines, fields, and departments, including Black studies. Where this anthology distinguishes itself is through its focus on the inextricable link between Black sexuality and the political and socioeconomic forces that regulate and discipline it. More specifically, the collection considers “the enduring link between capitalism and market and imagination and culture in its theories of black sexualities in ways that traditional scholarship on sexuality and race have refused or sublimated for the work of politics” (2–3). Some of the anthology’s essays adhere to labor and market analysis of Black sexualities in and under advanced capitalism more explicitly than others. Regardless of how clearly the essays coalesce around a shared conceptual preoccupation, all the topics explored are indeed challenging to status-quo politics. This is difficult work, which is one of the reasons why a Black feminist praxis of collaboration is so necessary. The collection, which identifies itself as a “critical race feminist project,” grew from workshops and a culminating 2013 conference organized by the Black Sexual Economies (BSE) Collective, a working group of eight scholars from seven US research institutions in the fields of law; African American and African diaspora studies; English; women’s, gender, and sexuality studies; film and media studies; history; American Studies; and the performing arts (1). These scholars—who met regularly on the Washington University campus for four years (from 2010 to 2013)—include project organizer and co-convener Adrienne D. Davis; co-convener Mireille MillerYoung; Marlon Bailey; Matt Richardson; Jeffrey McCune; Felice Blake; Xavier Livermon; and L.H. Stallings. The BSE Collective’s intention was to “serve as an incubator for the crafting of new paradigms for thinking about race, gender, sexuality, and class and the use of innovative interdisciplinary methodologies” (ix). The resulting collection
正如《黑人性经济:资本文化中的种族与性》(Black Sexual Economics:Race and Sex in a Culture of Capital)所充分承认的那样,黑人性研究是一个既定的、正在扩散的跨学科和跨学科的学术焦点。该框架是理解黑人性行为在美国历史上被构建为病态和性恐慌场所的核心。这种见解影响并发展了传统学科、领域和部门,包括黑人研究。这本选集的与众不同之处在于,它关注黑人性行为与规范和约束黑人性行为的政治和社会经济力量之间不可分割的联系。更具体地说,该系列考虑到“资本主义与市场、想象力与文化之间的持久联系,其黑人性取向理论是传统的性取向和种族学术拒绝或升华为政治工作的方式”(2-3)。该选集的一些文章比其他文章更明确地坚持了对先进资本主义及其下黑人性取向的劳动力和市场分析。不管这些文章围绕着一个共同的概念焦点结合得多么清晰,所探讨的所有主题都确实对现状政治构成了挑战。这是一项艰巨的工作,这也是为什么黑人女权主义合作实践如此必要的原因之一。该系列自称为“批判性种族女权主义项目”,源于黑人性经济集体组织的研讨会和2013年的一次会议,该集体是一个由来自美国七个法律研究机构的八名学者组成的工作组;非裔美国人和非洲侨民研究;英语妇女、性别和性研究;电影和媒体研究;历史美国研究;以及表演艺术(1)。这些学者在华盛顿大学校园定期会面四年(从2010年到2013年),其中包括项目组织者和联合召集人Adrienne D.Davis;联合召集人Mireille MillerYoung;Marlon Bailey;马特·理查森;Jeffrey McCune;Felice Blake;泽维尔·利弗蒙;和L.H.史泰林斯。BSE集体的意图是“作为一个孵化器,为思考种族、性别、性和阶级以及使用创新的跨学科方法创造新的范式”(ix)。生成的集合