Learning Outcomes Assessment Formats in Georgia after USSR

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Development Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-25 DOI:10.52340/jds.2022.02.29
Shorena Gogiashvili
{"title":"Learning Outcomes Assessment Formats in Georgia after USSR","authors":"Shorena Gogiashvili","doi":"10.52340/jds.2022.02.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The system of higher education in Georgia has been recently facing major challenges, especially in matching its outcomes to market and society demands. As the job market is becoming more globally competitive, these challenges are increasing.\n\nTo survive in the current business world, there is high competition between companies for highly qualified manpower. Higher education systems are, on the other hand, traditionally considered conservative and slow in response to market needs.\n\nHEIs have many stakeholders: parents, students, faculty members, graduates, employees, regulatory organizations, and government. Their expectations are different and often are in conflict with one another in many respects. Multi-stakeholder involvement in the assessment of learning outcomes is essential to realize students’ achievements. In these processes participation, collaboration and learning are emphasized. Participation leads to the perfect rating of the process and better evaluations of the outcomes.\n\nThe assessment of students/graduates by stakeholders is shaped by their participation in activities and their experiences in the processes. Understanding stakeholder importance in the processes in which they are involved and their evaluation of outcomes is imperative; it influences the current and future levels of engagement and improvement.","PeriodicalId":48295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52340/jds.2022.02.29","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The system of higher education in Georgia has been recently facing major challenges, especially in matching its outcomes to market and society demands. As the job market is becoming more globally competitive, these challenges are increasing. To survive in the current business world, there is high competition between companies for highly qualified manpower. Higher education systems are, on the other hand, traditionally considered conservative and slow in response to market needs. HEIs have many stakeholders: parents, students, faculty members, graduates, employees, regulatory organizations, and government. Their expectations are different and often are in conflict with one another in many respects. Multi-stakeholder involvement in the assessment of learning outcomes is essential to realize students’ achievements. In these processes participation, collaboration and learning are emphasized. Participation leads to the perfect rating of the process and better evaluations of the outcomes. The assessment of students/graduates by stakeholders is shaped by their participation in activities and their experiences in the processes. Understanding stakeholder importance in the processes in which they are involved and their evaluation of outcomes is imperative; it influences the current and future levels of engagement and improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏联解体后格鲁吉亚的学习成果评估模式
格鲁吉亚的高等教育体系最近面临着重大挑战,特别是在使其成果与市场和社会需求相匹配方面。随着就业市场的全球竞争日益激烈,这些挑战也在增加。为了在当今的商业世界中生存,企业之间对高素质人才的竞争非常激烈。另一方面,高等教育系统在传统上被认为是保守的,对市场需求的反应迟钝。高等教育机构有许多利益相关者:家长、学生、教师、毕业生、雇员、监管机构和政府。他们的期望是不同的,并且常常在许多方面相互冲突。多方利益相关者参与学习成果评估对实现学生的成就至关重要。在这些过程中,强调参与、合作和学习。参与导致对过程的完美评价和对结果的更好评估。利益相关者对学生/毕业生的评估取决于他们对活动的参与和他们在过程中的经历。理解利益相关者在他们参与的过程中的重要性以及他们对结果的评估是必要的;它影响当前和未来的参与和改进水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: The Journal of Development Studies was the first and is one of the best known international journals in the area of development studies. Since its foundation in 1964, it has published many seminal articles on development and opened up new areas of debate. Priority is given to papers which are: • relevant to important current research in development policy, theory and analysis • make a novel and significant contribution to the field • provide critical tests, based on empirical work, of alternative theories, perspectives or schools of thought We invite articles that are interdisciplinary or focused on particular disciplines (e.g. economics, politics, geography, sociology or anthropology), with an expectation that all work is accessible to readers across the social sciences. The editors also welcome surveys of the literature in important fields of development policy. All research articles in this journal undergo rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous peer review. Given the high level of submissions, a majority of submissions are rejected quickly with reasons.
期刊最新文献
Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico Second Bread: Potato Cultivation and Food Security in Kyrgyzstan Democracy in Hard Places Controlling the Capital: Political Dominance in the Urbanizing World Caste Inequality in Medical Crowdfunding in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1