Der Nister's Soviet Years: Yiddish Writer as Witness to the People

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY East European Jewish Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13501674.2022.2168163
H. Murav
{"title":"Der Nister's Soviet Years: Yiddish Writer as Witness to the People","authors":"H. Murav","doi":"10.1080/13501674.2022.2168163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"businesses, which were the object of boycotts on the part of both Polish and Ukrainian nationalists, developed their own defensive strategies, such as collaborating with the Ukrainian cooperative, Narodna torhivlia, or opening stores with a Ukrainian manager. Dolhanov concludes that economic nationalism in the 1930s did not attain its goals. Ukrainians could not stop the villages’ colonization; Poles could not stop the development of Ukrainian cooperation, and Jewish business in the cities remained strong. Some of the actions, such as an antialcohol campaign directed against Jewish tavern owners, were unsuccessful because of the lack of popular support. “Each to Their Own” presents the complex interrelation between state and non-state nationalism, which resulted in continuous confrontation in the economic sphere that involved most of the political organizations. However, the lack of a Jewish perspective and voice means that Jews are not shown to be equal subjects of modern politics. The book depicts Ukrainian and Polish modern nationalisms competing with the phenomenon of Jewish small storeowners and representatives of a previous order, often overlooking the fact that modern Jewish political movements had also taken a stance in this conflict. Jews, too, tried to solve the problem of the disproportional Jewish professional presence in trade, in part by organizing its own cooperative movements and providing educational programs in crafts such as dress-making. Another problem of the book is its lack of a longer perspective. Though the author shows how economic nationalism was a tool of both nationalizing state and modern movements, it would be helpful to understand the roots of the competition in the state and the evolution of Polish–Ukrainian–Jewish relations in the nineteenth century. For example, interwar Ukrainian cooperatives, and the anti-alcohol movement criticizing the abundance of Jewish liquor establishments, were present from the earlier stages of the Ukrainian national movement in the preceding decades. As noted, this is one of the first studies in Ukrainian historiography dedicated to the economic aspect of Ukrainian nationalism. Future researchers may wish to look more closely at the level of acceptance of new political doctrines, which in turn will enrich our understanding of how economic policy intersects with politics. In the meantime, this book will be helpful not only for scholars of nationalism in interwar Poland but also for those dealing with economic issues that shaped and influenced interethnic relations.","PeriodicalId":42363,"journal":{"name":"East European Jewish Affairs","volume":"52 1","pages":"121 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Jewish Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13501674.2022.2168163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

businesses, which were the object of boycotts on the part of both Polish and Ukrainian nationalists, developed their own defensive strategies, such as collaborating with the Ukrainian cooperative, Narodna torhivlia, or opening stores with a Ukrainian manager. Dolhanov concludes that economic nationalism in the 1930s did not attain its goals. Ukrainians could not stop the villages’ colonization; Poles could not stop the development of Ukrainian cooperation, and Jewish business in the cities remained strong. Some of the actions, such as an antialcohol campaign directed against Jewish tavern owners, were unsuccessful because of the lack of popular support. “Each to Their Own” presents the complex interrelation between state and non-state nationalism, which resulted in continuous confrontation in the economic sphere that involved most of the political organizations. However, the lack of a Jewish perspective and voice means that Jews are not shown to be equal subjects of modern politics. The book depicts Ukrainian and Polish modern nationalisms competing with the phenomenon of Jewish small storeowners and representatives of a previous order, often overlooking the fact that modern Jewish political movements had also taken a stance in this conflict. Jews, too, tried to solve the problem of the disproportional Jewish professional presence in trade, in part by organizing its own cooperative movements and providing educational programs in crafts such as dress-making. Another problem of the book is its lack of a longer perspective. Though the author shows how economic nationalism was a tool of both nationalizing state and modern movements, it would be helpful to understand the roots of the competition in the state and the evolution of Polish–Ukrainian–Jewish relations in the nineteenth century. For example, interwar Ukrainian cooperatives, and the anti-alcohol movement criticizing the abundance of Jewish liquor establishments, were present from the earlier stages of the Ukrainian national movement in the preceding decades. As noted, this is one of the first studies in Ukrainian historiography dedicated to the economic aspect of Ukrainian nationalism. Future researchers may wish to look more closely at the level of acceptance of new political doctrines, which in turn will enrich our understanding of how economic policy intersects with politics. In the meantime, this book will be helpful not only for scholars of nationalism in interwar Poland but also for those dealing with economic issues that shaped and influenced interethnic relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德尼斯特的苏联岁月:作为人民见证的意第绪语作家
企业是波兰和乌克兰民族主义者抵制的对象,它们制定了自己的防御策略,比如与乌克兰合作社Narodna torhivlia合作,或者与乌克兰经理一起开店。多尔哈诺夫总结说,20世纪30年代的经济民族主义并没有达到其目的。乌克兰人无法阻止这些村庄的殖民化;波兰人无法阻止乌克兰合作的发展,犹太人在这些城市的生意依然强劲。一些行动,例如针对犹太酒馆老板的反酒运动,由于缺乏民众支持而没有成功。“各行其是”呈现了国家和非国家民族主义之间的复杂相互关系,这导致了经济领域的持续对抗,其中涉及大多数政治组织。然而,缺乏犹太人的观点和声音意味着犹太人并没有被证明是现代政治的平等主体。这本书描述了乌克兰和波兰的现代民族主义与犹太小商店主和前一秩序代表的现象相竞争,经常忽略了现代犹太政治运动也在这场冲突中采取立场的事实。犹太人也试图解决犹太专业人员在贸易中比例失调的问题,部分是通过组织自己的合作运动和提供服装制作等工艺方面的教育项目。这本书的另一个问题是缺乏更长远的视角。尽管作者展示了经济民族主义是国家国有化和现代运动的工具,但这将有助于理解国家竞争的根源以及19世纪波兰-乌克兰-犹太关系的演变。例如,两次战争之间的乌克兰合作社,以及批评犹太酒类机构丰富的反酒精运动,都是在前几十年乌克兰民族运动的早期阶段出现的。如前所述,这是乌克兰史学中最早致力于乌克兰民族主义经济方面的研究之一。未来的研究人员可能希望更密切地关注对新政治学说的接受程度,这反过来将丰富我们对经济政策如何与政治交叉的理解。同时,这本书不仅有助于研究两次世界大战期间波兰民族主义的学者,也有助于处理塑造和影响民族间关系的经济问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“To reconstruct this period of martyrdom and heroism”: The Jewish Historical Institute and the Ringelblum Archive, 1946–1989 Slovak-language books published in 2018–2021 Jewish Emancipation: A History across Five Centuries Les Survivants: Les Juifs de Pologne depuis la Shoah The dual path of historian Artur Eisenbach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1