Assessing the viability of blockchain technology for enhancing court operations

D. Kumar, Sunil Kumar, Akashdeep Joshi
{"title":"Assessing the viability of blockchain technology for enhancing court operations","authors":"D. Kumar, Sunil Kumar, Akashdeep Joshi","doi":"10.1108/ijlma-03-2023-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to provide an extensive examination and analysis of the current literature on the use of blockchain technology in courts. The paper aims to explore the potential benefits of implementing blockchain technology in courts, such as increasing transparency and accountability, improving the efficiency of court procedures and enhancing the security of court records. Additionally, the paper intends to identify the challenges and limitations of using blockchain technology in courts and propose potential solutions to overcome these obstacles. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential applications and implications of blockchain technology in the context of the court system.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research design of this study is qualitative, involving a thorough examination and analysis of existing literature on the use of blockchain technology in courts. The data collection procedure involves gathering information from various sources, such as academic publications, official reports and other relevant records. Data analysis is conducted using a thematic analysis approach, which identifies and categorizes recurring themes that emerge from the data. This approach ensures that the results are credible, dependable and accurate representations of the experiences of the participants. By using these methodologies, the study is able to draw meaningful conclusions and insights into the use of blockchain technology in courts.\n\n\nFindings\nThe major findings of this paper suggest that the implementation of blockchain technology in courts has the potential to bring significant benefits such as increased transparency, efficiency and security. The use of blockchain technology in courts can enable the creation of tamper-proof records that are immutable, secure and transparent, which can help prevent fraud, reduce costs and enhance trust in the judicial system. However, adopting this technology also poses challenges and limitations, such as interoperability, governance and scalability. Overall, the paper concludes that while there are challenges to be addressed, the benefits of blockchain technology in courts are significant and should be explored further.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study has several limitations that need to be taken into account. Firstly, the availability of data on blockchain implementation in the court system is limited, making it challenging to provide a comprehensive analysis of the topic. Thus, the study’s findings may not be generalizable to other contexts. Secondly, the study takes a technology-centric approach and does not consider blockchain technology’s social and legal implications in court operations. Thirdly, the case studies presented in this paper are limited to a few countries. Moreover, the implementation of blockchain technology in the court system is still in its early stages and lacks standardization, technical expertise and regulatory frameworks. Lastly, uncertainty around the legal framework may hinder its widespread adoption and use.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe practical implications of this study suggest that the use of blockchain technology in courts has the potential to improve efficiency, security, transparency and accountability in the court system. It can reduce the risk of data tampering, expedite case resolution and lower the cost of legal proceedings. Therefore, this study provides a framework for courts to consider blockchain technology’s potential benefits and explore its future adoption.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe social implications of this study are significant, as the adoption of blockchain technology in the court system can have a profound impact on society. Firstly, by increasing transparency and accountability, blockchain technology can promote public trust in the court system and improve access to justice, particularly for disadvantaged communities (Liu et al., 2020). Secondly, blockchain technology can reduce the reliance on intermediaries, such as lawyers, and streamline the case management process, making legal services more accessible and affordable for the general public (Khurana, 2020). Finally, the use of blockchain technology can create a more secure and efficient court system, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the judicial system and promoting public confidence.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides an original contribution to the literature by exploring the use of blockchain technology in courts from a qualitative research design perspective. While there are a growing number of studies on the potential applications of blockchain technology in various fields, this study provides a comprehensive examination of the current literature on the use of blockchain in courts, identifying the benefits and limitations of its implementation. The study’s focus on the strengths and limitations of blockchain technology and its implications in court adds to the originality of this research.","PeriodicalId":46125,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-03-2023-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide an extensive examination and analysis of the current literature on the use of blockchain technology in courts. The paper aims to explore the potential benefits of implementing blockchain technology in courts, such as increasing transparency and accountability, improving the efficiency of court procedures and enhancing the security of court records. Additionally, the paper intends to identify the challenges and limitations of using blockchain technology in courts and propose potential solutions to overcome these obstacles. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential applications and implications of blockchain technology in the context of the court system. Design/methodology/approach The research design of this study is qualitative, involving a thorough examination and analysis of existing literature on the use of blockchain technology in courts. The data collection procedure involves gathering information from various sources, such as academic publications, official reports and other relevant records. Data analysis is conducted using a thematic analysis approach, which identifies and categorizes recurring themes that emerge from the data. This approach ensures that the results are credible, dependable and accurate representations of the experiences of the participants. By using these methodologies, the study is able to draw meaningful conclusions and insights into the use of blockchain technology in courts. Findings The major findings of this paper suggest that the implementation of blockchain technology in courts has the potential to bring significant benefits such as increased transparency, efficiency and security. The use of blockchain technology in courts can enable the creation of tamper-proof records that are immutable, secure and transparent, which can help prevent fraud, reduce costs and enhance trust in the judicial system. However, adopting this technology also poses challenges and limitations, such as interoperability, governance and scalability. Overall, the paper concludes that while there are challenges to be addressed, the benefits of blockchain technology in courts are significant and should be explored further. Research limitations/implications The study has several limitations that need to be taken into account. Firstly, the availability of data on blockchain implementation in the court system is limited, making it challenging to provide a comprehensive analysis of the topic. Thus, the study’s findings may not be generalizable to other contexts. Secondly, the study takes a technology-centric approach and does not consider blockchain technology’s social and legal implications in court operations. Thirdly, the case studies presented in this paper are limited to a few countries. Moreover, the implementation of blockchain technology in the court system is still in its early stages and lacks standardization, technical expertise and regulatory frameworks. Lastly, uncertainty around the legal framework may hinder its widespread adoption and use. Practical implications The practical implications of this study suggest that the use of blockchain technology in courts has the potential to improve efficiency, security, transparency and accountability in the court system. It can reduce the risk of data tampering, expedite case resolution and lower the cost of legal proceedings. Therefore, this study provides a framework for courts to consider blockchain technology’s potential benefits and explore its future adoption. Social implications The social implications of this study are significant, as the adoption of blockchain technology in the court system can have a profound impact on society. Firstly, by increasing transparency and accountability, blockchain technology can promote public trust in the court system and improve access to justice, particularly for disadvantaged communities (Liu et al., 2020). Secondly, blockchain technology can reduce the reliance on intermediaries, such as lawyers, and streamline the case management process, making legal services more accessible and affordable for the general public (Khurana, 2020). Finally, the use of blockchain technology can create a more secure and efficient court system, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the judicial system and promoting public confidence. Originality/value This study provides an original contribution to the literature by exploring the use of blockchain technology in courts from a qualitative research design perspective. While there are a growing number of studies on the potential applications of blockchain technology in various fields, this study provides a comprehensive examination of the current literature on the use of blockchain in courts, identifying the benefits and limitations of its implementation. The study’s focus on the strengths and limitations of blockchain technology and its implications in court adds to the originality of this research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估区块链技术在加强法庭运作方面的可行性
目的本文的目的是对当前关于区块链技术在法庭上使用的文献进行广泛的审查和分析。本文旨在探索在法庭上实施区块链技术的潜在好处,如提高透明度和问责制、提高法庭程序效率和增强法庭记录的安全性。此外,本文旨在确定在法庭上使用区块链技术的挑战和局限性,并提出克服这些障碍的潜在解决方案。最终目标是全面了解区块链技术在法院系统中的潜在应用和影响。设计/方法论/方法本研究的研究设计是定性的,涉及对现有关于区块链技术在法庭上使用的文献的彻底检查和分析。数据收集程序涉及从各种来源收集信息,如学术出版物、官方报告和其他相关记录。数据分析采用专题分析方法,对数据中反复出现的主题进行识别和分类。这种方法确保了结果可信、可靠和准确地反映了参与者的经验。通过使用这些方法,该研究能够对区块链技术在法庭上的使用得出有意义的结论和见解。发现本文的主要发现表明,区块链技术在法院的实施有可能带来显著的好处,如提高透明度、效率和安全性。在法庭上使用区块链技术可以创建不可变、安全和透明的防篡改记录,这有助于防止欺诈,降低成本,增强对司法系统的信任。然而,采用这项技术也带来了挑战和局限性,如互操作性、治理和可扩展性。总的来说,论文得出的结论是,尽管存在需要解决的挑战,但区块链技术在法庭上的好处是巨大的,应该进一步探索。研究局限性/含义这项研究有几个局限性需要考虑。首先,法院系统中区块链实施数据的可用性有限,因此很难对该主题进行全面分析。因此,这项研究的发现可能无法推广到其他情况。其次,该研究采取了以技术为中心的方法,没有考虑区块链技术在法庭运作中的社会和法律影响。第三,本文的案例研究仅限于少数几个国家。此外,区块链技术在法院系统中的实施仍处于早期阶段,缺乏标准化、技术专长和监管框架。最后,法律框架的不确定性可能阻碍其广泛采用和使用。实际含义本研究的实际含义表明,在法院中使用区块链技术有可能提高法院系统的效率、安全性、透明度和问责制。它可以降低数据篡改的风险,加快案件解决速度,降低法律诉讼成本。因此,本研究为法院考虑区块链技术的潜在利益并探索其未来采用提供了一个框架。社会含义这项研究的社会含义意义重大,因为在法院系统中采用区块链技术会对社会产生深远影响。首先,通过提高透明度和问责制,区块链技术可以促进公众对法院系统的信任,并改善诉诸司法的机会,特别是弱势社区(Liu et al.,2020)。其次,区块链技术可以减少对律师等中介机构的依赖,并简化案件管理流程,使公众更容易获得和负担得起法律服务(Khurana,2020)。最后,使用区块链技术可以创建一个更安全、更高效的法院系统,增强司法系统的整体效力,增强公众信心。独创性/价值本研究从定性研究设计的角度探讨了区块链技术在法庭上的使用,为文献提供了独创性贡献。尽管关于区块链技术在各个领域的潜在应用的研究越来越多,但这项研究对当前在法庭上使用区块链的文献进行了全面的审查,确定了其实施的好处和局限性。该研究对区块链技术的优势和局限性及其在法庭上的影响的关注增加了这项研究的独创性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Management is a leading journal addressing all aspects of regulation and law as they impact on organisational development, operations and leadership. Organisations and their leaders operate in an increasingly complex world of emerging regulation across national and international boundaries. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to acknowledge the dynamics of that environment and provide a platform for articles and contributions to stimulate scholarly debate in the development of law and practice. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to present the latest research on policy, practice and theoretical perspectives and their impact on the development and leadership of organisations. Contributions of a multi-disciplinary nature are welcome. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: -Employment and industrial law- Corporate governance and social responsibility- Intellectual property- Corporate law and finance- Insolvency- Commercial law and consumer protection- Environmental law- Taxation- Competition law- Regulatory theory
期刊最新文献
Foreign direct investment and the protection of garment workers' rights in Bangladesh From revelation to modern Islamic finance: Islamic commercial law in the UAE as a case study Three decades of WTO dispute settlement: insights from bibliometric literature review and future research agenda Inflated energy prices and capital structure: firm level evidence from Indian manufacturing sector Corporate carbon emissions, science-based targets initiatives and firm performance: evidence from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1