The Edizione critica delle opere di Gioachino Rossini and Self-Borrowing

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 N/A MUSIC Nineteenth-Century Music Review Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.1017/s1479409822000507
A. Malnati
{"title":"The Edizione critica delle opere di Gioachino Rossini and Self-Borrowing","authors":"A. Malnati","doi":"10.1017/s1479409822000507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-borrowing and Rossini: music theatre scholars are well acquainted with this topic. Many publications have been dedicated to it, most of which concentrate on compositional-analytic aspects, the artistic and communicational nature of self-borrowing and its reception in nineteenth-century periodicals. At present, however, no study has attempted to question the relation between Rossini's self-borrowings and the critical edition of his works. This is the issue to which this contribution is dedicated.\n Beginning with the operating indications summarized by the editorial criteria provided for the Edizione critica delle opere di Gioachino Rossini – first published in 1974, and revised and updated in 2015 – this study compares the various methodological approaches adopted while preparing critical editions and dealing with the specific features of each passage in which self-borrowing appears. This comparison furthermore allows us to formulate a general overview of the entire editorial undertaking. This in turn will give us a glimpse of how principles such as the autograph's centrality and concepts such as authenticity and originality have often become problematic and have been put into question. Knowing that Rossini often rewrote the pieces he self-borrowed is fundamental for philologists working on the critical edition of his works. Decoding the modus operandi Rossini adopted in each case of self-borrowing is therefore equally important, and can help choose the sources closest to Rossini's idea of the self-borrowed pieces at the time of their reuse.","PeriodicalId":41351,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479409822000507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-borrowing and Rossini: music theatre scholars are well acquainted with this topic. Many publications have been dedicated to it, most of which concentrate on compositional-analytic aspects, the artistic and communicational nature of self-borrowing and its reception in nineteenth-century periodicals. At present, however, no study has attempted to question the relation between Rossini's self-borrowings and the critical edition of his works. This is the issue to which this contribution is dedicated. Beginning with the operating indications summarized by the editorial criteria provided for the Edizione critica delle opere di Gioachino Rossini – first published in 1974, and revised and updated in 2015 – this study compares the various methodological approaches adopted while preparing critical editions and dealing with the specific features of each passage in which self-borrowing appears. This comparison furthermore allows us to formulate a general overview of the entire editorial undertaking. This in turn will give us a glimpse of how principles such as the autograph's centrality and concepts such as authenticity and originality have often become problematic and have been put into question. Knowing that Rossini often rewrote the pieces he self-borrowed is fundamental for philologists working on the critical edition of his works. Decoding the modus operandi Rossini adopted in each case of self-borrowing is therefore equally important, and can help choose the sources closest to Rossini's idea of the self-borrowed pieces at the time of their reuse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《乔亚奇诺·罗西尼自编》的关键版
自我借用与罗西尼:音乐戏剧学者对这一主题非常熟悉。许多出版物都致力于它,其中大多数集中在构图分析方面,自我借用的艺术和传播性质,以及它在19世纪期刊中的接受。然而,目前还没有研究试图质疑罗西尼的自我借用与他的作品评论版之间的关系。这就是这一贡献所致力于解决的问题。从1974年首次出版并于2015年修订和更新的《罗西尼歌剧院评论》编辑标准总结的操作指标开始,本研究比较了在准备评论版时采用的各种方法,并处理了每一段出现自我借用的具体特征。这种比较进一步使我们能够对整个编辑工作进行总体概述。这反过来又将让我们一窥签名的中心性等原则以及真实性和独创性等概念是如何经常成为问题并受到质疑的。知道罗西尼经常重写他自己借来的作品,对于从事其作品评论版工作的语文学家来说是至关重要的。因此,解码罗西尼在每种自借作品中采用的操作方式同样重要,并有助于在重新使用时选择最接近罗西尼自借作品理念的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
66.70%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Zanden Jos van der. Beethoven and Greco-Roman Antiquity (Abingdon: Routledge, 2022). xvi + 272 pp. £130.00 (cloth), £38.99 (paper), £35.09 (ebook). China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) as a Resource for Nineteenth-Century Music Studies Clara & Robert Schumann: Piano Concertos Beatrice Rana, pianoChamber Orchestra of EuropeYannick Nézet-Séguin, conductorWarner Classics, 5419729625, 2023(1 CD: 57 minutes) £12.75 Richard Strauss Online Nineteenth-Century Women in Music: MuGI, Sophie Drinker, Art Song Augmented and BID
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1