Comparative Analysis of Wind Energy Potential with Nakagami and Weibull Distribution Methods for Wind Turbine Planning

S. Suriadi, Muna Nabilah, M. Zainal, M. Yanis, M. Marwan, H. Hafidh, M. Affan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Wind Energy Potential with Nakagami and Weibull Distribution Methods for Wind Turbine Planning","authors":"S. Suriadi, Muna Nabilah, M. Zainal, M. Yanis, M. Marwan, H. Hafidh, M. Affan","doi":"10.13170/aijst.12.1.30736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wind energy is renewable energy used as an energy source for wind power plants (PLTB). The most common distribution method used to model wind speed distribution data is the Weibull distribution. The Nakagami distribution has begun to be widely used in several studies to model wind speed distribution data. The Nakagami distribution is considered an alternative to the Weibull distribution in modeling wind speed distribution data. This study aims to compare the distribution of Nakagami and Weibull in analyzing wind power potential and calculating the resulting Wind Energy Production (WEP), using wind speed distribution data from both distributions in Kuta Raja, Banda Aceh and Lhoknga, Aceh Besar. The wind speed data used is satellite data (secondary data) downloaded via windguru.cz, with the most stable wind speed being a wind speed of 3-5 m/s. The value of wind power potential at the Kuta Raja location, Banda Aceh was obtained at 64.16% with the Nakagami distribution and 62.73% with the Weibull distribution, and 73.60% with the Nakagami distribution and 73.28% at the Lhoknga location, Aceh Besar. The comparison of these two distributions produces a Weibull distribution that is superior to the Nakagami distribution for both locations, where the Weibull distribution has a smaller error value and produces a WEP value that is in accordance with the actual/observable data compared to the Nakagami distribution. In this study, the Nakagami distribution has results that make this distribution an alternative or comparison to the Weibull distribution in distributing wind speed data with further research.","PeriodicalId":7128,"journal":{"name":"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13170/aijst.12.1.30736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Wind energy is renewable energy used as an energy source for wind power plants (PLTB). The most common distribution method used to model wind speed distribution data is the Weibull distribution. The Nakagami distribution has begun to be widely used in several studies to model wind speed distribution data. The Nakagami distribution is considered an alternative to the Weibull distribution in modeling wind speed distribution data. This study aims to compare the distribution of Nakagami and Weibull in analyzing wind power potential and calculating the resulting Wind Energy Production (WEP), using wind speed distribution data from both distributions in Kuta Raja, Banda Aceh and Lhoknga, Aceh Besar. The wind speed data used is satellite data (secondary data) downloaded via windguru.cz, with the most stable wind speed being a wind speed of 3-5 m/s. The value of wind power potential at the Kuta Raja location, Banda Aceh was obtained at 64.16% with the Nakagami distribution and 62.73% with the Weibull distribution, and 73.60% with the Nakagami distribution and 73.28% at the Lhoknga location, Aceh Besar. The comparison of these two distributions produces a Weibull distribution that is superior to the Nakagami distribution for both locations, where the Weibull distribution has a smaller error value and produces a WEP value that is in accordance with the actual/observable data compared to the Nakagami distribution. In this study, the Nakagami distribution has results that make this distribution an alternative or comparison to the Weibull distribution in distributing wind speed data with further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风电机组规划中agami分布法与Weibull分布法的风能势比较分析
风能是一种可再生能源,用作风力发电厂(PLTB)的能源。最常用的风速分布数据建模方法是威布尔分布。Nakagami分布已经开始在一些研究中被广泛用于模拟风速分布数据。在风速分布数据建模中,Nakagami分布被认为是威布尔分布的一种替代方法。本研究的目的是比较Nakagami和Weibull在分析风电潜力和计算由此产生的风能产量(WEP)方面的分布,使用来自Banda Aceh的Kuta Raja和Aceh Besar的Lhoknga两种分布的风速分布数据。所用的风速数据是通过windguru下载的卫星数据(次级数据)。Cz,风速在3 ~ 5 m/s时最稳定。班达亚齐库塔拉贾地区的风电潜力值分别为中上分布的64.16%和威布尔分布的62.73%,亚齐省中上分布的73.60%和洛肯加地区的73.28%。这两种分布的比较产生的威布尔分布在两个位置都优于Nakagami分布,其中威布尔分布的误差值较小,与Nakagami分布相比,产生的WEP值更符合实际/可观测数据。在本研究中,Nakagami分布的结果使其可以替代或比较Weibull分布在进一步研究中的风速数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Structural Health Monitoring by Identification Dynamic Properties and Load Rating Factor at Multi-span Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridge Isotherm and Kinetic Adsorption of Cadmium (Cd) onto Biosorbent Made from Kepok Banana Peel (Musa Acuminata balbisian): the Effect of Activator Type and Biosorbent Dosage Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Payback Period of 12-kW Wind Turbine for a Remote Telecommunications Base Station Simulation of Multi Reservoir Operation Rules with Interconnected Tunnel and Water Transfer Simple Technology of Material Physics of Groundwater Conservation in Dealing with Climate Change in Disaster Areas of North Sumatra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1