Implementing the intensity of care model in a surgical department: an evaluation

Giovanna Mulloni, E. Fabbro, R. Quattrin, M. Mesaglio, Linda Orsettigh, R. Petri
{"title":"Implementing the intensity of care model in a surgical department: an evaluation","authors":"Giovanna Mulloni, E. Fabbro, R. Quattrin, M. Mesaglio, Linda Orsettigh, R. Petri","doi":"10.12968/bjhc.2021.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors' hospital implemented an intensity of care model in the surgical department, grouping patients by the level of care they required (low, high or intensive) and creating a short-stay unit for patients requiring a low level of care. This study evaluated care quality, along with staff and patient perceptions, in the department 3 years after this model was implemented. Data were collected from mandatory national databanks regarding organisation, economic, staff and patient factors relating to care quality and efficiency. The department's performance according to National Outcome Programme indicators was also assessed. Data from staff and patient satisfaction questionnaires used for routine audit were analysed retrospectively. Both questionnaires asked respondents to rate their satisfaction to items on a 5-point Likert scale so their scores could be analysed. Satisfaction scores for staff in the short-stay unit were compared with those working in general surgery using a t-test, with P<0.05 indicating a significant difference. Some improvements were found 3 years after the model was implemented, including increased elective activity and reduced length of stay. Patient satisfaction with the short-stay unit was generally high. However, staff satisfaction was generally low and turnover rates were high. The intensity of care model and the use of a short-stay unit can lead to benefits for surgical care, but further research is needed to determine its effects on all aspects of care quality and, especially, staff satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":35342,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Care Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2021.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors' hospital implemented an intensity of care model in the surgical department, grouping patients by the level of care they required (low, high or intensive) and creating a short-stay unit for patients requiring a low level of care. This study evaluated care quality, along with staff and patient perceptions, in the department 3 years after this model was implemented. Data were collected from mandatory national databanks regarding organisation, economic, staff and patient factors relating to care quality and efficiency. The department's performance according to National Outcome Programme indicators was also assessed. Data from staff and patient satisfaction questionnaires used for routine audit were analysed retrospectively. Both questionnaires asked respondents to rate their satisfaction to items on a 5-point Likert scale so their scores could be analysed. Satisfaction scores for staff in the short-stay unit were compared with those working in general surgery using a t-test, with P<0.05 indicating a significant difference. Some improvements were found 3 years after the model was implemented, including increased elective activity and reduced length of stay. Patient satisfaction with the short-stay unit was generally high. However, staff satisfaction was generally low and turnover rates were high. The intensity of care model and the use of a short-stay unit can lead to benefits for surgical care, but further research is needed to determine its effects on all aspects of care quality and, especially, staff satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科实施护理强度模式的评估
作者所在的医院在外科实施了一种护理强度模式,根据患者需要的护理水平(低、高或强化)对患者进行分组,并为需要低水平护理的患者创建一个短期住院单元。本研究评估了该模式实施3年后该部门的护理质量,以及员工和患者的看法。数据是从强制性的国家数据库中收集的,涉及组织、经济、员工和患者等与护理质量和效率有关的因素。还根据国家成果方案指标评估了该部的业绩。回顾性分析用于常规审计的工作人员和患者满意度问卷的数据。这两份调查问卷都要求受访者用李克特5分量表对他们对项目的满意度进行评分,以便分析他们的分数。短期住院科室员工满意度得分与普通外科科室员工满意度得分比较采用t检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。在该模型实施3年后,发现了一些改进,包括增加了选择性活动和缩短了住院时间。患者对短期住院单位的满意度普遍较高。然而,员工满意度普遍较低,离职率较高。护理模式的强度和短期住院单位的使用可以为外科护理带来好处,但需要进一步的研究来确定其对护理质量的各个方面的影响,特别是对员工满意度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: British Journal of Healthcare Management (BJHCM) is the independent monthly journal which is essential reading for all health service managers, policymakers, influencers and commentators. Launched in 1995, BJHCM mixes peer-reviewed management articles with interviews, analysis and comment to bring you a sharp, topical and valuable insight into what"s happening in and around the NHS. To reflect the way that the NHS is changing, the journal has recently received a major face-lift and several new features now appear alongside BJHCM"s excellent state-of-the-art review articles and celebrated columnists.
期刊最新文献
In memory of monica duncan, 1950–2023 Does switching from tobacco to reduced-risk products free up hospital resources? Value-based pricing of add-on life-extending medicines based on economic evaluation Sociodemographic determinants of structural empowerment and organisational commitment among critical care nurses in Saudi Arabia: a comparative cross-sectional study One-fifth of adults in England will have a major illness by 2040: a reflection for healthcare managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1