A city and its people: exploring limitations to participation within modern urban space

Q3 Social Sciences Studies in Political Economy Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/07078552.2021.1949786
Wesley Petite
{"title":"A city and its people: exploring limitations to participation within modern urban space","authors":"Wesley Petite","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2021.1949786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent scholarship has revealed a “participatory paradox” that highlights how increased support for participatory initiatives continues to be limited by centralized forms of decisionmaking. To explain this paradox, this article uses the analytical framework of Critical Institutionalism (CI) to explain how the professionalization of planning establishes distinct ways of knowing the urban public realm. Despite the presence of new participatory practices, these professionalized ways of knowing continue to trump the experiential knowledge of participants.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"102 1","pages":"119 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Recent scholarship has revealed a “participatory paradox” that highlights how increased support for participatory initiatives continues to be limited by centralized forms of decisionmaking. To explain this paradox, this article uses the analytical framework of Critical Institutionalism (CI) to explain how the professionalization of planning establishes distinct ways of knowing the urban public realm. Despite the presence of new participatory practices, these professionalized ways of knowing continue to trump the experiential knowledge of participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市及其居民:探索参与现代城市空间的限制
摘要最近的学术研究揭示了一个“参与性悖论”,它突出了对参与性倡议的支持是如何继续受到集中决策形式的限制的。为了解释这一悖论,本文使用批判制度主义(CI)的分析框架来解释规划的专业化如何建立了解城市公共领域的独特方式。尽管存在新的参与实践,但这些专业化的认识方式仍然胜过参与者的经验知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Political Economy
Studies in Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.
期刊最新文献
Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—concepts of class Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—the climate, public power, and the means of social reproduction Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—proletarian ecology, environmental provision, and the welfare of children as a public good Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—staying in the ring Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—towards a politics of better
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1