Barriers to the utilization of wellness days in graduate medical education

W. Kinzler, Melissa Mooney, Helen Ding, Kara Scalice, Carole Filangieri, M. Akerman, P. Rekawek
{"title":"Barriers to the utilization of wellness days in graduate medical education","authors":"W. Kinzler, Melissa Mooney, Helen Ding, Kara Scalice, Carole Filangieri, M. Akerman, P. Rekawek","doi":"10.12688/mep.19501.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Personal well-being is an important component of a resilient physician and can reduce the risk of burnout. To address this, our institution implemented a wellness-day policy to promote self-care.  The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency in which house staff (HS) use wellness days and to identify barriers to their utilization. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to all HS at a single sponsoring institution through a secure online survey platform in 2019-2021. Those that took one or both of the wellness days were compared with those that took none using Chi-square. Comparisons across years were made using Cochran-Armitage Trend test, with a P value <0.05 denoting statistical significance. Results: There were 386/878 responses, representing a 44% response rate. Only 31% of HS took both wellness days and 50% took none. Reasons for not taking a wellness day included not wanting to burden the program, having no need for them and being discouraged by the program. HS that took one or both days were more likely to identify as female (60% vs 45%, p=0.007) but not more likely to be married or have children. Interns were less likely (38% vs 51%; p=0.04) and fellows were more likely (61% vs 47%; p=0.03) to take a wellness day.  Conclusions: The utilization of wellness days is variable. Increased utilization can serve to normalize their use and minimize the burden felt by house staff. Education at orientation and leadership buy-in is essential to policy success.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19501.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Personal well-being is an important component of a resilient physician and can reduce the risk of burnout. To address this, our institution implemented a wellness-day policy to promote self-care.  The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency in which house staff (HS) use wellness days and to identify barriers to their utilization. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to all HS at a single sponsoring institution through a secure online survey platform in 2019-2021. Those that took one or both of the wellness days were compared with those that took none using Chi-square. Comparisons across years were made using Cochran-Armitage Trend test, with a P value <0.05 denoting statistical significance. Results: There were 386/878 responses, representing a 44% response rate. Only 31% of HS took both wellness days and 50% took none. Reasons for not taking a wellness day included not wanting to burden the program, having no need for them and being discouraged by the program. HS that took one or both days were more likely to identify as female (60% vs 45%, p=0.007) but not more likely to be married or have children. Interns were less likely (38% vs 51%; p=0.04) and fellows were more likely (61% vs 47%; p=0.03) to take a wellness day.  Conclusions: The utilization of wellness days is variable. Increased utilization can serve to normalize their use and minimize the burden felt by house staff. Education at orientation and leadership buy-in is essential to policy success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究生医学教育中利用健康日的障碍
背景:个人幸福感是一名有韧性的医生的重要组成部分,可以降低倦怠的风险。为了解决这一问题,我们的机构实施了一项健康日政策,以促进自我保健。本研究的目的是确定家庭工作人员(HS)使用健康日的频率,并确定其使用的障碍。方法:在2019-2021年,通过一个安全的在线调查平台,对一家赞助机构的所有HS进行问卷调查。使用卡方将那些只花了一天或两天的健康日的人与那些没有花的人进行比较。使用Cochran Armitage趋势检验对各年份进行比较,P值<0.05表示统计学意义。结果:共有386/878例应答,应答率为44%。只有31%的HS同时参加了两个健康日,50%的HS没有参加。不参加健康日的原因包括不想给项目带来负担、不需要健康日以及对项目感到气馁。耗时一天或两天的HS更有可能被认定为女性(60%对45%,p=0.007),但不太可能结婚或生孩子。实习生参加健康日的可能性较小(38%对51%;p=0.04),同事参加健康日活动的可能性较大(61%对47%;p=0.03)。结论:健康日的利用率是可变的。提高利用率可以使其使用正常化,并最大限度地减轻房屋工作人员的负担。定向教育和领导层的认同对政策的成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medical students' knowledge on palliative care - a survey of teaching in Finland. Developing a clinician-friendly rubric for assessing history-taking skills in medical undergraduates speaking English as a foreign language. A retrospective feedback analysis of objective structured clinical examination performance of undergraduate medical students. Guidelines for Integrating actionable A-SMART Learning Outcomes into the Backward Design Process. Practical tips for teaching medicine in the metaverse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1