{"title":"Unequal investing in the human capital of children (The case of Russia)","authors":"S. Mareeva, E. Slobodenyuk","doi":"10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-3-98-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use RLMS HSE data to assess unequal investments in the human capital of children in Russia. Our analysis shows that the position of households in socio-economic hierarchies by the level of education, professional status, income and subjective positioning differentiates investing in children’s education. The increase in the share of households that invest in the human capital of children occurs while moving from less to more prosperous positions in each of these hierarchies. Between 2013 and 2018, the number of households spending on children’s education increased, but the pandemic caused the situation to reverse, offsetting these results in all but the most affluent groups. In terms of children engagement in additional educational activities (for schoolchildren – apart from school, for preschoolers – in addition to home and family activities), it turns out that children are highly engaged in creative activities, to a lesser extent in sports, and to the least extent in child development courses. At times of the Covid pandemic engagement in sports and creative activities reduced for children from advantaged and less advantaged households. Engagement in development courses proved to be most resilient to this external shock. Children participating in development activities belong to households with high social status, given various axes of social differentiation, but even in these they are a minority. Multilateral engagement of the child, i.e. participation in all three types of additional educational activities, is uncommon, while complete exclusion from any forms of extracurricular or extrafamilial activities is widespread. © С.В. Мареева, Е.Д. Слободенюк, 2022","PeriodicalId":44272,"journal":{"name":"Terra Economicus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terra Economicus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-3-98-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
对儿童人力资本的不平等投资(以俄罗斯为例)
我们使用RLMS HSE数据来评估俄罗斯儿童人力资本的不平等投资。我们的分析表明,根据教育水平、职业地位、收入和主观定位,家庭在社会经济等级中的地位会区分对儿童教育的投资。投资于儿童人力资本的家庭比例增加的同时,在每一个等级制度中,家庭的地位都从不那么富裕转向更富裕。2013年至2018年间,用于儿童教育的家庭数量有所增加,但疫情导致情况逆转,抵消了除最富裕群体外的所有群体的这些结果。在儿童参与额外的教育活动方面(对于学童——除了学校,对于学龄前儿童——除了家庭和家庭活动),事实证明,儿童高度参与创造性活动,较少参与体育活动,最少参与儿童发展课程。在新冠肺炎疫情期间,来自优势和劣势家庭的儿童参与体育和创造性活动的人数减少。事实证明,参与发展课程最能抵御这种外部冲击。参与发展活动的儿童属于社会地位高的家庭,有各种社会分化的轴心,但即使在这些家庭中,他们也是少数。儿童的多边参与,即参与所有三种类型的额外教育活动,并不常见,而完全排除在任何形式的课外或家庭外活动之外的情况普遍存在。©С.В.Мареева,А.Д.Слободен́к,2022
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。