Validation of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9 (SAVE-9) Scale and Relationship With Insomnia or Depression Among Healthcare Workers Who Witnessed Patient’s Death in COVID-19 Pandemic

Q4 Medicine Sleep Medicine Research Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.17241/smr.2022.01501
Dongin Lee, Issa Kamaleddine, Inn-Kyu Cho, Oli Ahmed, E. Cho
{"title":"Validation of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9 (SAVE-9) Scale and Relationship With Insomnia or Depression Among Healthcare Workers Who Witnessed Patient’s Death in COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Dongin Lee, Issa Kamaleddine, Inn-Kyu Cho, Oli Ahmed, E. Cho","doi":"10.17241/smr.2022.01501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective We tested the psychometric properties of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9 (SAVE-9) scale among healthcare workers who experienced patients’ deaths.Methods From June 2nd to 10th, 2022, an anonymous, online survey was administered to medical doctors and nursing professionals who witnessed the deaths of patients they cared for during the last two years. Participants demographic characteristics and responses to the SAVE-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) were collected.Results A total of 267 responses were collected in this survey. The two-factor model of the SAVE-9 fits well among healthcare workers who witnessed patients’ death (CFI = 1.000, GFI = 0.996, RMSEA = 0.000, RSMR = 0.040). The SAVE-9 scale showed good reliability of internal consistency and convergent validity with the GAD-7 (r = 0.429, p = 0.001), PHQ-9 score (r = 0.414, p = 0.001), and ISI (r = 0.368, p = 0.001).Conclusions We observed that the SAVE-9 and its two subscales were valid and reliable tools for measuring work-related stress and viral anxiety among healthcare workers who witnessed the death of their patients.","PeriodicalId":37318,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2022.01501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and Objective We tested the psychometric properties of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9 (SAVE-9) scale among healthcare workers who experienced patients’ deaths.Methods From June 2nd to 10th, 2022, an anonymous, online survey was administered to medical doctors and nursing professionals who witnessed the deaths of patients they cared for during the last two years. Participants demographic characteristics and responses to the SAVE-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) were collected.Results A total of 267 responses were collected in this survey. The two-factor model of the SAVE-9 fits well among healthcare workers who witnessed patients’ death (CFI = 1.000, GFI = 0.996, RMSEA = 0.000, RSMR = 0.040). The SAVE-9 scale showed good reliability of internal consistency and convergent validity with the GAD-7 (r = 0.429, p = 0.001), PHQ-9 score (r = 0.414, p = 0.001), and ISI (r = 0.368, p = 0.001).Conclusions We observed that the SAVE-9 and its two subscales were valid and reliable tools for measuring work-related stress and viral anxiety among healthcare workers who witnessed the death of their patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行中目睹患者死亡的医护人员中,压力和焦虑对病毒流行-9 (SAVE-9)量表的验证及其与失眠或抑郁的关系
背景和目的我们在经历过患者死亡的医护人员中测试了压力和焦虑对病毒性流行病-9(SAVE-9)量表的心理测量特性。方法从2022年6月2日至10日,对在过去两年中目睹其护理的患者死亡的医生和护理专业人员进行匿名在线调查。收集参与者的人口统计学特征和对SAVE-9、广泛性焦虑障碍-7(GAD-7)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和失眠严重程度指数(ISI)的反应。结果本次调查共收集到267份回复。SAVE-9的双因素模型非常适合目睹患者死亡的医护人员(CFI=1.000,GFI=0.996,RMSEA=0.000,RSMR=0.040),和ISI(r=0.368,p=0.001)。结论我们观察到,SAVE-9及其两个分量表是衡量目睹患者死亡的医护人员工作压力和病毒性焦虑的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Research
Sleep Medicine Research Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Clinical Benefits and Limitations Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder: What Is Known and What Should Be Studied Sleep Quality Assessment in Correlation to Autonomic Nerve Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Positional Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Therapeutic Modalities and Clinical Effects Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in a Patient With a History of Tongue Base Tumor Resection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1