Beyond borders: steering metropolitan growth priorities through spatial imaginaries

IF 1.2 Q2 Social Sciences Australian Planner Pub Date : 2020-03-14 DOI:10.1080/07293682.2020.1739094
Kane Pham
{"title":"Beyond borders: steering metropolitan growth priorities through spatial imaginaries","authors":"Kane Pham","doi":"10.1080/07293682.2020.1739094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Borders and boundaries are practical ways of organising spatial relations in metropolitan regions. They usefully define administrative divisions between local government areas, informing the constraints of land-use plans, and describe individual sites necessary for the transaction and development of property and land. However, functional divisions of space are not always clear cut. Contemporary challenges of urbanisation and globalisation often ignore administrative-political boundaries, thus statutory divisions of space are required to be woven into other functional spatial layers drawing attention to the strategic-statutory interface of planning systems and governance arrangements. Although not new, experiments with spatial imaginaries have accelerated, and have become central to metropolitan strategies. In Sydney, the Greater Parramatta and Olympic Peninsula functional economic corridor introduces both new mechanisms for implementation and statutory weight on top of strategic direction. We draw attention to the way this spatial imaginary utilises (or ignores) existing borders and boundaries in an attempt to rebalance the spatial structure of the metropolitan region. Through this case study, we highlight the challenges of rebalancing the Sydney metropolitan region, and the broader implications that emerge through the use of spatial imaginaries.","PeriodicalId":45599,"journal":{"name":"Australian Planner","volume":"56 1","pages":"103 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07293682.2020.1739094","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Planner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2020.1739094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Borders and boundaries are practical ways of organising spatial relations in metropolitan regions. They usefully define administrative divisions between local government areas, informing the constraints of land-use plans, and describe individual sites necessary for the transaction and development of property and land. However, functional divisions of space are not always clear cut. Contemporary challenges of urbanisation and globalisation often ignore administrative-political boundaries, thus statutory divisions of space are required to be woven into other functional spatial layers drawing attention to the strategic-statutory interface of planning systems and governance arrangements. Although not new, experiments with spatial imaginaries have accelerated, and have become central to metropolitan strategies. In Sydney, the Greater Parramatta and Olympic Peninsula functional economic corridor introduces both new mechanisms for implementation and statutory weight on top of strategic direction. We draw attention to the way this spatial imaginary utilises (or ignores) existing borders and boundaries in an attempt to rebalance the spatial structure of the metropolitan region. Through this case study, we highlight the challenges of rebalancing the Sydney metropolitan region, and the broader implications that emerge through the use of spatial imaginaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越边界:通过空间想象引导大都市的增长重点
边界和边界是组织大都市区域空间关系的实用方法。它们有效地界定了地方政府区域之间的行政区划,告知了土地使用计划的约束,并描述了房地产和土地交易和开发所必需的个别地点。然而,空间的功能划分并不总是明确的。城市化和全球化的当代挑战往往忽略了行政-政治边界,因此需要将空间的法定划分编织到其他功能空间层中,从而引起对规划系统和治理安排的战略-法定接口的关注。虽然并不新鲜,但空间想象的实验正在加速,并已成为大都市战略的核心。在悉尼,大帕拉马塔和奥林匹克半岛功能经济走廊在战略方向上引入了新的实施机制和法定权重。我们提请注意这种空间想象利用(或忽略)现有边界和边界的方式,试图重新平衡大都市区的空间结构。通过这个案例研究,我们强调了重新平衡悉尼大都市区所面临的挑战,以及通过使用空间想象所产生的更广泛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Planner
Australian Planner REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the music industries of Brisbane and an evaluation of the policy response Planning for open space and recreation in new high density areas: a reply to Marriott Practice reflections on the pandemic from South East Queensland Planning with foresight and resilience: the Planning Institute of Australia National Congress in Adelaide 2023 How have South Australian urban planning policies affected Blakeview’s surface temperatures?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1