Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge Among Dentists and Physicians

M. Simmons, James Sayre, H. Schotland, D. Jeffe
{"title":"Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge Among Dentists and Physicians","authors":"M. Simmons, James Sayre, H. Schotland, D. Jeffe","doi":"10.15331/jdsm.7212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a largely undiagnosed and untreated sleep disorder with public health implications. This study investigated whether dentists were as knowledgeable about OSA as physicians. Methods: Two convenience samples of California dentists were surveyed online (N=107) and in-person (N=63) between January and April 2019 using the 18 knowledge items from the validated Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge and Attitudes (OSAKA) Questionnaire. California dentists’ total score was then compared to a compilation of published physicians’ total OSA-knowledge scores from 12 studies (2003-2020) using Chi-square tests with Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.0023. OSA-knowledge gaps and competencies were also compared on individual item data provided for nine of the published physician studies. Results: Mean total correct OSA-knowledge scores were 73.6% for California dentists (N=170) and 63.9% across all physicians (N=2,559); scores were 84.5% for Canadian otolaryngology residents (N=66), 75.6% for U.S. physicians (N=305), and 62.3% for all other non-U.S. physicians (N=2,188). The all-physician group had more knowledge gaps than dentists. Conclusion: Dentists had noninferior knowledge of OSA compared with most physician groups. Findings suggest that dentists may serve to increase the number of healthcare providers able to identify and treat patients with OSA, mitigating this healthcare gap. Suboptimal sleep medicine and OSA training in medical and dental education remains a challenge, perpetuating the public health ramifications of underdiagnosed and undertreated OSA. Clinical Implications: Engaging more dentists to identify patients at risk for OSA at the point of care and treat or refer patients for treatment, as appropriate, helps meet this public health need.","PeriodicalId":91534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental sleep medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15331/jdsm.7212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Study Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a largely undiagnosed and untreated sleep disorder with public health implications. This study investigated whether dentists were as knowledgeable about OSA as physicians. Methods: Two convenience samples of California dentists were surveyed online (N=107) and in-person (N=63) between January and April 2019 using the 18 knowledge items from the validated Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge and Attitudes (OSAKA) Questionnaire. California dentists’ total score was then compared to a compilation of published physicians’ total OSA-knowledge scores from 12 studies (2003-2020) using Chi-square tests with Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.0023. OSA-knowledge gaps and competencies were also compared on individual item data provided for nine of the published physician studies. Results: Mean total correct OSA-knowledge scores were 73.6% for California dentists (N=170) and 63.9% across all physicians (N=2,559); scores were 84.5% for Canadian otolaryngology residents (N=66), 75.6% for U.S. physicians (N=305), and 62.3% for all other non-U.S. physicians (N=2,188). The all-physician group had more knowledge gaps than dentists. Conclusion: Dentists had noninferior knowledge of OSA compared with most physician groups. Findings suggest that dentists may serve to increase the number of healthcare providers able to identify and treat patients with OSA, mitigating this healthcare gap. Suboptimal sleep medicine and OSA training in medical and dental education remains a challenge, perpetuating the public health ramifications of underdiagnosed and undertreated OSA. Clinical Implications: Engaging more dentists to identify patients at risk for OSA at the point of care and treat or refer patients for treatment, as appropriate, helps meet this public health need.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙医和医生对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的认识
研究目的:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种未经诊断和治疗的睡眠障碍,对公共健康有影响。这项研究调查了牙医是否和医生一样了解OSA。方法:在2019年1月至4月期间,使用经验证的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停知识和态度(OSAKA)问卷中的18个知识项目,对加州牙医的两个方便样本进行了在线调查(N=107)和亲自调查(N=63)。然后,将加州牙医的总分与12项研究(2003-2020年)公布的医生OSA知识总分进行比较,使用卡方检验,Bonferroni调整后p<0.0023。还对9项已发表的医师研究提供的单项数据进行了OSA知识差距和能力的比较。结果:加州牙医(N=170)的OSA知识平均总正确率为73.6%,所有医生(N=2559)为63.9%;加拿大耳鼻喉科住院医师的得分为84.5%(N=66),美国医生的得分为75.6%(N=305),所有其他非美国医师的得分均为62.3%。美国内科医生(N=2188)。全医生组的知识差距比牙医组大。结论:与大多数医生组相比,牙科医生对OSA的了解并不差。研究结果表明,牙医可能有助于增加能够识别和治疗OSA患者的医疗保健提供者的数量,从而缓解这种医疗保健差距。医学和牙科教育中的次优睡眠医学和OSA培训仍然是一个挑战,使诊断不足和治疗不足的OSA对公共健康的影响永久存在。临床意义:让更多的牙医在护理点识别有OSA风险的患者,并酌情治疗或转诊患者进行治疗,有助于满足这一公共卫生需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Mandibular Advancement Devices on Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Markers of Cardiovascular Health in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Prospective Case Series Protocol Perspectives on Benefits of Attending the AADSM Annual Meeting 2024 AADSM Annual Meeting Late-Breaking Abstracts and Case Reports A Novel Method for Pre-selectivity of Oral Appliance Palliative Pharyngeal Airway Outcomes in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study Management of a Hyperactive Gag Reflex for Oral Appliance Therapy: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1