Book Discussion: Winner, 2020 Distinguished Book Award, Asian Law and Society Association (ALSA), Anna High, Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China: Law, Policy, and Practice (Routledge, 2019): Introduction by Hiroshi Fukurai

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Asian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2022-07-20 DOI:10.1017/als.2022.13
Hiroshi Fukurai
{"title":"Book Discussion: Winner, 2020 Distinguished Book Award, Asian Law and Society Association (ALSA), Anna High, Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China: Law, Policy, and Practice (Routledge, 2019): Introduction by Hiroshi Fukurai","authors":"Hiroshi Fukurai","doi":"10.1017/als.2022.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Furthermore, in 2020, China, India, and South Korea became the top three countries in the world that made arrangements for international adoption of their orphans and vulnerable children. 1 Since the beginning of this millennium, the \"geopolitical” analysis of the rise in the number of orphans and other vulnerable children began to receive increased international attention from socio-legal scholars, state policy-makers, human rights organizations, and international agencies around the globe. [...]agencies included the UN and other international groups, including UNICEF, the Defense for Children International (DCI), Save the Children, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), among many others. 2 The increase in vulnerable children spiked when the world was hit by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. 6 Many orphaned children were adopted by Chinese families without knowledge of their ancestral connections to their parents, siblings, and families in Japan, despite the China–Japan collaborative efforts to address this human rights issues for many decades following the war. 7 The governmental policy on reproductive restriction due to China's one-child policy has also affected unwanted pregnancies and infant femicides for many decades. 8 In addition, the lack of public and private resources and inabilities of families to deal with disabled children and those with significant handicaps have led to their abandonment and calamitous situations. While this reproductive policy might not have been imposed on other ethnic minorities, such as Muslims in Xinjiang and Tibetan autonomous regions, the lack of resources for orphans and other vulnerable children has also been reported elsewhere, including those areas faced with illegal adoption and child abandonment, among others. 9 There has been a rapid economic ascension of the Chinese economy, during which, according to the World Bank (WB) report, more than 850 million Chinese people have moved out of destitute poverty.","PeriodicalId":54015,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","volume":"9 1","pages":"519 - 522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2022.13","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Furthermore, in 2020, China, India, and South Korea became the top three countries in the world that made arrangements for international adoption of their orphans and vulnerable children. 1 Since the beginning of this millennium, the "geopolitical” analysis of the rise in the number of orphans and other vulnerable children began to receive increased international attention from socio-legal scholars, state policy-makers, human rights organizations, and international agencies around the globe. [...]agencies included the UN and other international groups, including UNICEF, the Defense for Children International (DCI), Save the Children, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), among many others. 2 The increase in vulnerable children spiked when the world was hit by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. 6 Many orphaned children were adopted by Chinese families without knowledge of their ancestral connections to their parents, siblings, and families in Japan, despite the China–Japan collaborative efforts to address this human rights issues for many decades following the war. 7 The governmental policy on reproductive restriction due to China's one-child policy has also affected unwanted pregnancies and infant femicides for many decades. 8 In addition, the lack of public and private resources and inabilities of families to deal with disabled children and those with significant handicaps have led to their abandonment and calamitous situations. While this reproductive policy might not have been imposed on other ethnic minorities, such as Muslims in Xinjiang and Tibetan autonomous regions, the lack of resources for orphans and other vulnerable children has also been reported elsewhere, including those areas faced with illegal adoption and child abandonment, among others. 9 There has been a rapid economic ascension of the Chinese economy, during which, according to the World Bank (WB) report, more than 850 million Chinese people have moved out of destitute poverty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图书讨论:亚洲法律与社会协会(ALSA)2020杰出图书奖得主,Anna High,《中国非政府孤儿救济:法律、政策和实践》(Routledge,2019):简介:福井宏
此外,2020年,中国、印度和韩国成为世界上为孤儿和弱势儿童的国际收养做出安排的前三个国家。1自本千年开始以来,对孤儿和其他弱势儿童数量增加的“地缘政治”分析开始受到社会法律学者、国家政策制定者、人权组织和全球国际机构的越来越多的国际关注。[…]机构包括联合国和其他国际组织,包括联合国儿童基金会、国际儿童保护组织、拯救儿童组织和美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)等。2 2020年,当世界受到新冠肺炎大流行的打击时,弱势儿童的数量急剧增加。6许多孤儿被中国家庭收养,他们不知道自己与日本父母、兄弟姐妹和家庭的祖先关系,尽管战后几十年来中日一直在合作解决这一人权问题。7几十年来,由于中国的独生子女政策,政府的生育限制政策也影响了意外怀孕和杀害婴儿的行为。8此外,由于缺乏公共和私人资源,家庭无力照顾残疾儿童和有严重残疾的儿童,导致他们被遗弃,处境悲惨。虽然这一生育政策可能没有强加给其他少数民族,如新疆和西藏自治区的穆斯林,但其他地方也报道了孤儿和其他弱势儿童缺乏资源的情况,包括那些面临非法收养和遗弃儿童的地区。9中国经济迅速发展,根据世界银行的报告,在这期间,超过8.5亿中国人摆脱了贫困。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Law and Society (AJLS) adds an increasingly important Asian perspective to global law and society scholarship. This independent, peer-reviewed publication encourages empirical and multi-disciplinary research and welcomes articles on law and its relationship with society in Asia, articles bringing an Asian perspective to socio-legal issues of global concern, and articles using Asia as a starting point for a comparative exploration of law and society topics. Its coverage of Asia is broad and stretches from East Asia, South Asia and South East Asia to Central Asia. A unique combination of a base in Asia and an international editorial team creates a forum for Asian and Western scholars to exchange ideas of interest to Asian scholars and professionals, those working in or on Asia, as well as all working on law and society issues globally.
期刊最新文献
A Dynamic Theory of Prosecutorial Roles in Adversarial Trials Interrogating the Drunkards and Representing Drunkenness in the Qing Law Coexisting with Drug Addiction: Strategies Used by Hong Kong’s Older Mixed Users to Improve Their Perceived Quality of Life Liability Beyond Law: Conceptions of Fairness in Chinese Tort Cases Neocolonial Digitality: Analyzing Digital Legal Databases Using Legal Pluralism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1