Owen M. Edwards, D. D. Edwards, Sarah I. Duncan, D. Laurencio, J. Goessling
{"title":"Range Expansion and Dispersal Traits of Green Treefrogs (Hyla cinerea)","authors":"Owen M. Edwards, D. D. Edwards, Sarah I. Duncan, D. Laurencio, J. Goessling","doi":"10.1670/21-063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Since the 1980s, there has been rapid and ongoing hypothesized climate-related range expansion in native Green Treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) northward and eastward in Illinois, Kentucky, and Indiana, United States. Because anuran leg length is positively correlated with locomotor function, longer legs have been shown to facilitate dispersal of invasive anuran populations undergoing biological invasion. These recent range-expansion populations of H. cinerea provide an ideal opportunity to test if a native frog species exhibits similar changes in dispersal-related traits to those found in invasive species. We tested if individuals on the front end of this expansion exhibit significant differences in femur length when compared with frogs collected from the historical-range distribution. We predicted that frogs found at the expansion edge would have longer femur lengths than their counterparts located in historical parts of the range. We found that relative to snout–vent length (SVL), the femur lengths (FL) of H. cinerea from expanded ranges were on average significantly larger than those of frogs from the historical range. This suggests that native expanded-range populations of this species have undergone changes in FL. Rapid shifts in morphological traits of a native species, H. cinerea, in expanded-range populations, appear to mimic morphological trade-offs observed for invasive species of anurans.","PeriodicalId":54821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Herpetology","volume":"57 1","pages":"151 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1670/21-063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract. Since the 1980s, there has been rapid and ongoing hypothesized climate-related range expansion in native Green Treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) northward and eastward in Illinois, Kentucky, and Indiana, United States. Because anuran leg length is positively correlated with locomotor function, longer legs have been shown to facilitate dispersal of invasive anuran populations undergoing biological invasion. These recent range-expansion populations of H. cinerea provide an ideal opportunity to test if a native frog species exhibits similar changes in dispersal-related traits to those found in invasive species. We tested if individuals on the front end of this expansion exhibit significant differences in femur length when compared with frogs collected from the historical-range distribution. We predicted that frogs found at the expansion edge would have longer femur lengths than their counterparts located in historical parts of the range. We found that relative to snout–vent length (SVL), the femur lengths (FL) of H. cinerea from expanded ranges were on average significantly larger than those of frogs from the historical range. This suggests that native expanded-range populations of this species have undergone changes in FL. Rapid shifts in morphological traits of a native species, H. cinerea, in expanded-range populations, appear to mimic morphological trade-offs observed for invasive species of anurans.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Herpetology accepts manuscripts on all aspects on the biology of amphibians and reptiles including their behavior, conservation, ecology, morphology, physiology, and systematics, as well as herpetological education. We encourage authors to submit manuscripts that are data-driven and rigorous tests of hypotheses, or provide thorough descriptions of novel taxa (living or fossil). Topics may address theoretical issues in a thoughtful, quantitative way. Reviews and policy papers that provide new insight on the herpetological sciences are also welcome, but they must be more than simple literature reviews. These papers must have a central focus that propose a new argument for understanding a concept or a new approach for answering a question or solving a problem. Focus sections that combine papers on related topics are normally determined by the Editors. Publication in the Long-Term Perspectives section is by invitation only. Papers on captive breeding, new techniques or sampling methods, anecdotal or isolated natural history observations, geographic range extensions, and essays should be submitted to our sister journal, Herpetological Review.