Plant growth stages and weather index insurance design

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Annals of Actuarial Science Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1017/s1748499523000167
Jing Zou, M. Odening, Ostap Okhrin
{"title":"Plant growth stages and weather index insurance design","authors":"Jing Zou, M. Odening, Ostap Okhrin","doi":"10.1017/s1748499523000167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Given the assumption that weather risks affect crop yields, we designed a weather index insurance product for soybean producers in the US state of Illinois. By separating the entire vegetation cycle into four growth stages, we investigate whether the phase-division procedure contributes to weather–yield loss relation estimation and, hence, to basis risk mitigation. Concretely, supposing stage-variant interaction patterns between temperature-based weather index growing degree days and rainfall-based weather index cumulative rainfall, a nonparametric weather–yield loss relation is estimated by a generalized additive model. The model includes penalized B-spline (P-spline) approach based on nonlinear optimal indemnity solutions under the expected utility framework. The P-spline analysis of variance (PS-ANOVA) method is used for efficient estimation through mixed model re-parameterization. The results indicate that the phase-division models significantly outperform the benchmark whole-cycle ones either under quadratic utility or exponential utility, given different levels of risk aversions. Finally, regarding hedging effectiveness, the expected utility ratio between the phase-division contract and the whole-cycle contract, and the percentage changes of mean root square loss and variance of revenues support the proposed phase-division contract.","PeriodicalId":44135,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Actuarial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Actuarial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499523000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Given the assumption that weather risks affect crop yields, we designed a weather index insurance product for soybean producers in the US state of Illinois. By separating the entire vegetation cycle into four growth stages, we investigate whether the phase-division procedure contributes to weather–yield loss relation estimation and, hence, to basis risk mitigation. Concretely, supposing stage-variant interaction patterns between temperature-based weather index growing degree days and rainfall-based weather index cumulative rainfall, a nonparametric weather–yield loss relation is estimated by a generalized additive model. The model includes penalized B-spline (P-spline) approach based on nonlinear optimal indemnity solutions under the expected utility framework. The P-spline analysis of variance (PS-ANOVA) method is used for efficient estimation through mixed model re-parameterization. The results indicate that the phase-division models significantly outperform the benchmark whole-cycle ones either under quadratic utility or exponential utility, given different levels of risk aversions. Finally, regarding hedging effectiveness, the expected utility ratio between the phase-division contract and the whole-cycle contract, and the percentage changes of mean root square loss and variance of revenues support the proposed phase-division contract.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物生长阶段与天气指数保险设计
假设天气风险影响作物产量,我们为美国伊利诺伊州的大豆生产者设计了一种天气指数保险产品。通过将整个植被周期划分为四个生长阶段,我们研究了阶段划分程序是否有助于天气-产量损失关系估计,从而有助于基础风险缓解。具体而言,假设基于温度的天气指数增温日数与基于降雨量的天气指数累积降雨量之间存在阶段性的相互作用模式,利用广义加性模型估计了非参数天气-产量损失关系。该模型采用基于期望效用框架下非线性最优补偿解的惩罚b样条(p样条)方法。采用p样条方差分析(PS-ANOVA)方法,通过混合模型再参数化进行有效估计。结果表明,在风险厌恶程度不同的情况下,分相模型在二次效用和指数效用下均显著优于基准全周期模型。最后,在套期保值有效性方面,分阶段合约与全周期合约之间的预期效用比、均方根损失和收益方差的百分比变化均支持建议的分阶段合约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Generalized Poisson random variable: its distributional properties and actuarial applications Optimizing insurance risk assessment: a regression model based on a risk-loaded approach AffineMortality: An R package for estimation, analysis, and projection of affine mortality models On the benefits of pension plan consolidation: Understanding the impact of full plan mergers Bonus-Malus Scale premiums for Tweedie’s compound Poisson models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1