Corporate Tax Avoidance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Readability: Evidence from China

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Australian Accounting Review Pub Date : 2022-05-08 DOI:10.1111/auar.12372
Shuolei Xu, Fangjun Wang, Charles P. Cullinan, Nanyan Dong
{"title":"Corporate Tax Avoidance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Readability: Evidence from China","authors":"Shuolei Xu,&nbsp;Fangjun Wang,&nbsp;Charles P. Cullinan,&nbsp;Nanyan Dong","doi":"10.1111/auar.12372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Paying taxes to support the societies in which they operate is both a legal and ethical responsibility of business. Nevertheless, some companies work to avoid taxes, which could cause society to question the legitimacy of the organisation. Many companies provide reports on their corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities; more transparent CSR reports may help to restore the legitimacy loss associated with tax avoidance. We investigate the relationship between tax avoidance and CSR report readability among Chinese companies. We find a positive relationship between corporate tax avoidance and the readability of CSR reports. This relation is weaker among state-owned enterprises, which may have stronger pre-existing legitimacy owing to their relationship with the state. The relationship is also weaker among companies in less developed regions of China, which have less developed institutions to monitor organisational legitimacy. Overall, our results are consistent with the notion that CSR reporting represents an attempt to overcome legitimacy concerns arising from tax avoidance. Our findings indicate that tax avoidance and CSR reporting are alternative means of establishing legitimacy, rather than complementary reflections of an organisational culture that values (or devalues) CSR.</p>","PeriodicalId":51552,"journal":{"name":"Australian Accounting Review","volume":"32 2","pages":"267-289"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/auar.12372","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Paying taxes to support the societies in which they operate is both a legal and ethical responsibility of business. Nevertheless, some companies work to avoid taxes, which could cause society to question the legitimacy of the organisation. Many companies provide reports on their corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities; more transparent CSR reports may help to restore the legitimacy loss associated with tax avoidance. We investigate the relationship between tax avoidance and CSR report readability among Chinese companies. We find a positive relationship between corporate tax avoidance and the readability of CSR reports. This relation is weaker among state-owned enterprises, which may have stronger pre-existing legitimacy owing to their relationship with the state. The relationship is also weaker among companies in less developed regions of China, which have less developed institutions to monitor organisational legitimacy. Overall, our results are consistent with the notion that CSR reporting represents an attempt to overcome legitimacy concerns arising from tax avoidance. Our findings indicate that tax avoidance and CSR reporting are alternative means of establishing legitimacy, rather than complementary reflections of an organisational culture that values (or devalues) CSR.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业避税与企业社会责任披露可读性:来自中国的证据
纳税以支持其经营所在的社会,既是企业的法律责任,也是道德责任。然而,一些公司努力避税,这可能会导致社会质疑该组织的合法性。许多公司提供企业社会责任(CSR)活动报告;更透明的企业社会责任报告可能有助于恢复与避税相关的合法性损失。本文研究了中国企业的避税行为与企业社会责任报告可读性之间的关系。我们发现企业避税与企业社会责任报告的可读性之间存在正相关关系。这种关系在国有企业中较弱,由于国有企业与国家的关系,国有企业可能具有更强的预先存在的合法性。在中国欠发达地区的企业中,这种关系也较弱,因为这些地区监管组织合法性的机构不发达。总体而言,我们的结果与企业社会责任报告代表了克服避税引起的合法性问题的尝试这一概念是一致的。我们的研究结果表明,避税和企业社会责任报告是建立合法性的替代手段,而不是重视(或贬低)企业社会责任的组织文化的互补反映。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Accounting Review
Australian Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Boundaries of Accounting The Shifting and Permeable Boundaries of Auditing: Evidence from Early Australian Examination Papers CEO Benevolence and Corporate Social Performance Integrated Reporting Impact on Core Organisational Practices: A Practice-Based Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1