Collective Affordances

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2019-11-26 DOI:10.1080/10407413.2019.1695211
Martin Weichold, G. Thonhauser
{"title":"Collective Affordances","authors":"Martin Weichold, G. Thonhauser","doi":"10.1080/10407413.2019.1695211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article develops an ecological framework for understanding collective action. This is contrasted with approaches familiar from the collective intentionality debate, which treat individuals (with collective intentions) as fundamental units of collective action. Instead, we turn to social ecological psychology and dynamical systems theory and argue that they provide a promising framework for understanding collectives as the central unit in collective action. However, we submit that these approaches do not yet appreciate enough the relevance of social identities for collective action. To analyze this aspect, we build on key insights from social identity theory and synthesize it with embodied and ecological accounts of perception and action. This results in the proposal of two new types of affordances. For an individual who enacts her “embodied social identity” of being a member of a particular collective, there can be what we call embodied social identity affordances. Moreover, when several individuals dynamically interact with each other against the background of their embodied social identities, this might lead to the emergence of a collective, which we understand as a dynamically constituted and ecologically situated perception-action system consisting of several individuals enacting relevant embodied social identity affordances. Building on previous work in social ecological psychology, we suggest that there can be genuine collective affordances, that is, affordances whose subject is not an individual, but a collective.","PeriodicalId":47279,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10407413.2019.1695211","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2019.1695211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Abstract This article develops an ecological framework for understanding collective action. This is contrasted with approaches familiar from the collective intentionality debate, which treat individuals (with collective intentions) as fundamental units of collective action. Instead, we turn to social ecological psychology and dynamical systems theory and argue that they provide a promising framework for understanding collectives as the central unit in collective action. However, we submit that these approaches do not yet appreciate enough the relevance of social identities for collective action. To analyze this aspect, we build on key insights from social identity theory and synthesize it with embodied and ecological accounts of perception and action. This results in the proposal of two new types of affordances. For an individual who enacts her “embodied social identity” of being a member of a particular collective, there can be what we call embodied social identity affordances. Moreover, when several individuals dynamically interact with each other against the background of their embodied social identities, this might lead to the emergence of a collective, which we understand as a dynamically constituted and ecologically situated perception-action system consisting of several individuals enacting relevant embodied social identity affordances. Building on previous work in social ecological psychology, we suggest that there can be genuine collective affordances, that is, affordances whose subject is not an individual, but a collective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集体意
摘要本文提出了一个理解集体行动的生态学框架。这与集体意向性辩论中常见的方法形成了对比,后者将个人(具有集体意向)视为集体行动的基本单位。相反,我们转向社会生态心理学和动力系统理论,认为它们为理解集体作为集体行动的核心单元提供了一个很有前途的框架。然而,我们认为,这些方法还没有充分认识到社会身份对集体行动的相关性。为了分析这一方面,我们建立在社会身份理论的关键见解之上,并将其与感知和行动的具体化和生态化描述相结合。这导致了两种新的可供性类型的提出。对于一个表现出作为特定集体成员的“具体社会身份”的个人来说,可以有我们所说的具体社会身份启示。此外,当几个个体在其具体社会身份的背景下动态地相互作用时,这可能会导致集体的出现,我们将其理解为一个动态构成的、生态环境下的感知-行动系统,由几个个体组成,制定相关的具体社会身份启示。在社会生态心理学先前研究的基础上,我们认为可以存在真正的集体可供性,即主体不是个人而是集体的可供性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Psychology
Ecological Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: This unique journal publishes original articles that contribute to the understanding of psychological and behavioral processes as they occur within the ecological constraints of animal-environment systems. It focuses on problems of perception, action, cognition, communication, learning, development, and evolution in all species, to the extent that those problems derive from a consideration of whole animal-environment systems, rather than animals or their environments in isolation from each other. Significant contributions may come from such diverse fields as human experimental psychology, developmental/social psychology, animal behavior, human factors, fine arts, communication, computer science, philosophy, physical education and therapy, speech and hearing, and vision research.
期刊最新文献
Intergroup Relations as Dynamical Systems: Advancements and Recommendations for Research on Intergroup Friendship and Prejudice Confrontations Remembering Reuben Baron: Creating a Better Social and Ecological Psychology Socializing Ecological Psychology, Ecologizing Social Psychology: How Reuben Baron Shaped the Ecological Approach to Social Knowing, Cooperation, and Values Extending Affordances with Evolutionary Psychology and Connectionist Models: An Essay in Honor of Reuben Baron Conceptualizing the Environment in a Time of Ecological Collapse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1