Solution-focused brief therapy to improve child well-being and family functioning outcomes with substance using parents in the child welfare system

Q2 Social Sciences Developmental Child Welfare Pub Date : 2019-03-05 DOI:10.1177/2516103219829479
Johnny S. Kim, Becci A. Akin, J. Brook
{"title":"Solution-focused brief therapy to improve child well-being and family functioning outcomes with substance using parents in the child welfare system","authors":"Johnny S. Kim, Becci A. Akin, J. Brook","doi":"10.1177/2516103219829479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) on child well-being and family functioning outcomes for child welfare involved parents. A randomized controlled trial design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of SFBT as compared to treatment-as-usual in an outpatient substance abuse treatment center. Mixed linear models tested within and between-group changes using intent-to-treat analysis (N = 180). Hedges’s g effect sizes examined the magnitude of treatment effects. Both conditions reported improvements on the child well-being measures (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [BRIEF]-Parent Report and Child Behavior Checklist-School Age Form [CBCL-SA]) and family functioning measures (Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory [AAPI-2] and Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression [CES-D] Short Form) at posttest. While none of the between group analyses were statistically significant on either outcome domains, effect sizes did show improvements in the small to medium range for both groups. SFBT effect sizes for BRIEF subscales ranged from .024 to .267 and for control group ranged from .136 to .363. SFBT effect sizes on CBCL-SA subscales ranged from .059 to .321 and for control group ranged from .101 to .313. SFBT effect sizes on AAPI-2 subscales ranged from .006 to .620 and control group ranged from .023 to .624. SFBT effect sizes on CES-D measure were .428 and for control group were .317. Results show SFBT to be an effective intervention for helping parents around child well-being and family functioning outcomes similar to current empirically-supported therapies. SFBT provides a more strengths-based approach to help families improve family well-being and thus help improve their child’s well-being.","PeriodicalId":36239,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Child Welfare","volume":"1 1","pages":"124 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2516103219829479","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Child Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516103219829479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) on child well-being and family functioning outcomes for child welfare involved parents. A randomized controlled trial design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of SFBT as compared to treatment-as-usual in an outpatient substance abuse treatment center. Mixed linear models tested within and between-group changes using intent-to-treat analysis (N = 180). Hedges’s g effect sizes examined the magnitude of treatment effects. Both conditions reported improvements on the child well-being measures (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [BRIEF]-Parent Report and Child Behavior Checklist-School Age Form [CBCL-SA]) and family functioning measures (Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory [AAPI-2] and Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression [CES-D] Short Form) at posttest. While none of the between group analyses were statistically significant on either outcome domains, effect sizes did show improvements in the small to medium range for both groups. SFBT effect sizes for BRIEF subscales ranged from .024 to .267 and for control group ranged from .136 to .363. SFBT effect sizes on CBCL-SA subscales ranged from .059 to .321 and for control group ranged from .101 to .313. SFBT effect sizes on AAPI-2 subscales ranged from .006 to .620 and control group ranged from .023 to .624. SFBT effect sizes on CES-D measure were .428 and for control group were .317. Results show SFBT to be an effective intervention for helping parents around child well-being and family functioning outcomes similar to current empirically-supported therapies. SFBT provides a more strengths-based approach to help families improve family well-being and thus help improve their child’s well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决方案为重点的简短治疗,以改善儿童福祉和家庭功能的结果与物质使用的父母在儿童福利系统
本研究考察了以解决方案为中心的短期治疗(SFBT)对儿童福利和家庭功能结果的影响。采用随机对照试验设计来评价SFBT与门诊药物滥用治疗中心常规治疗的有效性。使用意向治疗分析测试组内和组间变化的混合线性模型(N = 180)。赫奇斯效应量检验了治疗效果的大小。两种情况下,儿童幸福感测量(执行功能行为评定量表[BRIEF]-家长报告和儿童行为检查表-学龄期表[CBCL-SA])和家庭功能测量(成人-青少年父母调查表[AAPI-2]和流行病学研究中心-抑郁症[CES-D]短表)均在后测中有所改善。虽然两组之间的分析在任何一个结果域上都没有统计学意义,但效应量确实显示两组在小到中等范围内都有改善。BRIEF分量表的SFBT效应量为0.024至0.267,对照组的效应量为0.136至0.363。SFBT在CBCL-SA分量表上的效应量为0.059 ~ 0.321,对照组的效应量为0.101 ~ 0.313。SFBT在AAPI-2分量表上的效应量为0.006 ~ 0.620,对照组的效应量为0.023 ~ 0.624。SFBT对CES-D测量的效应量为0.428,对照组的效应量为0.317。结果表明,SFBT是一种有效的干预措施,可以帮助父母了解儿童福祉和家庭功能结果,类似于目前经验支持的治疗方法。SFBT提供了一种更基于优势的方法来帮助家庭改善家庭幸福,从而帮助改善他们孩子的幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Child Welfare
Developmental Child Welfare Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 measures on the lives of unaccompanied refugee minors Preparedness for adulthood among young adults with histories of out-of-home care Evaluating the impact of attachment and trauma training for children’s social care teams Evaluating the impact of attachment and trauma training for children’s social care teams Cumulative risk exposure is associated with increased risk for PTSD but not depression or anxiety. Results from a UK clinical sample of children and adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1