Efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of combination laser and tranexamic acid treatment for melasma: A meta-analysis

Arika Latashia Adelia , Sri Adila Nurainiwati , Probo Yudha Pratama Putra , Aulia Sita Hapsari
{"title":"Efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of combination laser and tranexamic acid treatment for melasma: A meta-analysis","authors":"Arika Latashia Adelia ,&nbsp;Sri Adila Nurainiwati ,&nbsp;Probo Yudha Pratama Putra ,&nbsp;Aulia Sita Hapsari","doi":"10.1016/j.cjprs.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Melasma is an acquired pigmentation condition characterized by its refractory nature and a high risk of recurrence. Treatment of melasma is challenging owing to its unclear etiology, stubborn resistance to treatment, and frequent relapses. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy (combination of laser and tranexamic acid (TXA)) for the treatment of melasma using a network meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The PRISMA guidelines were used in this meta-analysis, with a literature search conducted in reputable sources, such as Cochrane, Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From the initial search, 1 504 relevant studies were identified. After careful analysis, three studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no significant differences in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score between monotherapy (control group) and a combination therapy of laser and TXA. The mean difference in MASI score was 1.87 (95% confidence interval (CI), −0.78–4.52; <em>P</em>=0.17), indicating no significant difference between the two treatment approaches. Side effects were more common in the combination treatment group than in the control group. The odds ratio for experiencing side effects was 8.85 (95% CI, 1.57–50.01; <em>P</em>=0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both the monotherapy and combination therapy groups showed therapeutic improvement; however, the combination therapy group showed a higher incidence of side effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":65600,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 154-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691123000420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Melasma is an acquired pigmentation condition characterized by its refractory nature and a high risk of recurrence. Treatment of melasma is challenging owing to its unclear etiology, stubborn resistance to treatment, and frequent relapses. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy (combination of laser and tranexamic acid (TXA)) for the treatment of melasma using a network meta-analysis.

Method

The PRISMA guidelines were used in this meta-analysis, with a literature search conducted in reputable sources, such as Cochrane, Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar.

Results

From the initial search, 1 504 relevant studies were identified. After careful analysis, three studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no significant differences in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score between monotherapy (control group) and a combination therapy of laser and TXA. The mean difference in MASI score was 1.87 (95% confidence interval (CI), −0.78–4.52; P=0.17), indicating no significant difference between the two treatment approaches. Side effects were more common in the combination treatment group than in the control group. The odds ratio for experiencing side effects was 8.85 (95% CI, 1.57–50.01; P=0.01).

Conclusion

Both the monotherapy and combination therapy groups showed therapeutic improvement; however, the combination therapy group showed a higher incidence of side effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光联合氨甲环酸治疗黄褐斑的疗效、有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析
背景:黄褐斑是一种获得性色素沉着疾病,其特点是难治性和高复发风险。黄褐斑的治疗是具有挑战性的,因为它的病因不明,顽固的抵抗治疗,和频繁的复发。因此,本研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析,比较单药治疗和联合治疗(激光联合氨甲环酸(TXA))治疗黄褐斑的疗效、有效性和安全性。方法本荟萃分析采用PRISMA指南,并在Cochrane、Science Direct、PubMed和Google Scholar等知名来源进行文献检索。结果从最初的检索中,确定了1504项相关研究。经过仔细分析,三个研究被纳入meta分析。结果显示,单纯治疗组(对照组)与激光联合TXA治疗组黄褐斑面积及严重程度指数(MASI)评分无显著差异。MASI评分的平均差异为1.87(95%置信区间(CI),−0.78-4.52;P=0.17),两种治疗方法无显著差异。联合治疗组的副作用比对照组更常见。出现副作用的优势比为8.85 (95% CI, 1.57-50.01;P = 0.01)。结论单药组和联合治疗组疗效均有改善;然而,联合治疗组的副作用发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Pathology and Medical Technology, Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary treatment of molten aluminum combined burn: An unusual case report Lateral circumflex femoral artery perforator flap for the reconstruction of head soft tissue defects: Cross-region venous anastomosis Role of targeted neuromodulation in the treatment of congenital unilateral lower lip palsy: A clinical case report A new technique for correction of iatrogenic upper eyelid retraction by using a composite flap of the orbicularis muscle and fascia on the anterior surface of the tarsal plate A new technique of monsplasty as an adjunctive procedure in cases of abdominoplasty: A prospective clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1