Brown v. Board of Education and the Development of Special Education

IF 0.7 4区教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Intervention in School and Clinic Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/10534512211014874

M. Yell

引用次数: 1

Abstract

May 2020 was the 66th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. In this case, perhaps the most important ruling of the 20th century, the Supreme Court ruled that the racial segregation of Black children in public schools was unconstitutional. In addition, the ruling in Brown v. Board had a profound effect on the education of children with disabilities. The purpose of this column is to examine the Supreme Court’s ruling and to explore the impact of the rulings on students with disabilities.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

布朗诉教育和特殊教育发展委员会案

2020年5月是美国最高法院对布朗诉托皮卡教育委员会案作出裁决66周年。在本案中，也许是20世纪最重要的裁决，最高法院裁定公立学校对黑人儿童的种族隔离是违宪的。此外，Brown诉Board案的裁决对残疾儿童的教育产生了深远影响。本专栏的目的是审查最高法院的裁决，并探讨裁决对残疾学生的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Intervention in School and Clinic EDUCATION, SPECIAL-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Intervention in School and Clinic is practitioner-oriented and designed to provide practical, research-based ideas to educators who work with students with severe learning disabilities and emotional/behavioral problems. Emphasis is placed on strategies and techniques that can be easily implemented in school or clinic settings and address the multifaceted needs of students with severe LD and emotional/behavioral problems. Specifically, articles should target curricular, instructional, social, behavioral, assessment, and vocational strategies and techniques and have direct application to the classroom setting.