Next Generation Cartilage Repair and the Pre-arthroplasty Patient

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.otsm.2022.150956
Devon E. Anderson MD, PhD , Adam Gridley MBA , Dennis C. Crawford MD, PhD
{"title":"Next Generation Cartilage Repair and the Pre-arthroplasty Patient","authors":"Devon E. Anderson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Adam Gridley MBA ,&nbsp;Dennis C. Crawford MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.otsm.2022.150956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The NeoCart implant (Histogenics Corporation, Waltham, MA; Ocugen Inc., Malvern, PA) is a cell-based therapeutic for the restoration of articular cartilage defects. The implant is composed of a </span>type I collagen<span> scaffold, inoculated with expanded autologous chondrocytes<span>, and preconditioned under hydrostatic loading and low oxygen tension. The process was designed to create an autogenous chondrogenic construct for application during a surgical biologic reconstruction procedure for patients with symptomatic cartilage disease. Favorable pre-clinical basic science and animal studies characterizing the regenerative potential of NeoCart led to application for United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as the first autologous tissue therapeutic for articular cartilage restoration, beginning with a Phase I safety trial in 2003.</span></span></p><p><span>Deemed safe in Phase I and efficacious in Phase II relative to “standard of care” microfracture<span>, a Phase III randomized controlled superiority trial versus microfracture was authorized by FDA in 2010. The primary outcome measure of a statistically significant difference in the number of responders to treatment versus control based on meeting a dual-criteria threshold of &gt;20-point and &gt;12-point improvement in International Knee Documentation Committee and </span></span>Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain domain scores, respectively, was established. The 1-year protocol assessment metric for superiority was narrowly missed, which led to termination of the trial in 2019. Ultimately, the therapy was not approved for use by the FDA. The history of this case example: quelching a biologically safe and effective therapeutic, highlights hurdles in the complex process of bringing scientifically sound products to patients through regulatory processes in the United States.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54678,"journal":{"name":"Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine","volume":"30 4","pages":"Article 150956"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060187222000685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The NeoCart implant (Histogenics Corporation, Waltham, MA; Ocugen Inc., Malvern, PA) is a cell-based therapeutic for the restoration of articular cartilage defects. The implant is composed of a type I collagen scaffold, inoculated with expanded autologous chondrocytes, and preconditioned under hydrostatic loading and low oxygen tension. The process was designed to create an autogenous chondrogenic construct for application during a surgical biologic reconstruction procedure for patients with symptomatic cartilage disease. Favorable pre-clinical basic science and animal studies characterizing the regenerative potential of NeoCart led to application for United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as the first autologous tissue therapeutic for articular cartilage restoration, beginning with a Phase I safety trial in 2003.

Deemed safe in Phase I and efficacious in Phase II relative to “standard of care” microfracture, a Phase III randomized controlled superiority trial versus microfracture was authorized by FDA in 2010. The primary outcome measure of a statistically significant difference in the number of responders to treatment versus control based on meeting a dual-criteria threshold of >20-point and >12-point improvement in International Knee Documentation Committee and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain domain scores, respectively, was established. The 1-year protocol assessment metric for superiority was narrowly missed, which led to termination of the trial in 2019. Ultimately, the therapy was not approved for use by the FDA. The history of this case example: quelching a biologically safe and effective therapeutic, highlights hurdles in the complex process of bringing scientifically sound products to patients through regulatory processes in the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“下一代软骨修复和关节成形术前患者。”
NeoCart植入物(Histogenics Corporation, Waltham, MA;Ocugen Inc., Malvern, PA)是一种基于细胞的关节软骨缺损修复疗法。植入物由I型胶原支架组成,接种扩展的自体软骨细胞,并在静水压和低氧张力下进行预处理。该过程旨在创建一个自体软骨结构,用于有症状的软骨疾病患者的外科生物重建过程中。良好的临床前基础科学和动物研究表征了NeoCart的再生潜力,从而使其成为美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的第一个用于关节软骨修复的自体组织治疗药物,从2003年的I期安全性试验开始。相对于“标准治疗”微骨折,一项III期随机对照优势试验被认为是安全的,II期有效,FDA于2010年批准了一项针对微骨折的III期随机对照优势试验。根据国际膝关节文献委员会和膝关节损伤与骨关节炎结局评分疼痛域评分分别满足20分和12分改善的双重标准阈值,建立了治疗与对照组应答者数量有统计学显著差异的主要结局测量指标。1年方案的优势评估指标差一点错过,导致该试验于2019年终止。最终,这种疗法没有被FDA批准使用。这一案例的历史:压制一种生物学上安全和有效的治疗方法,突显了在美国通过监管程序向患者提供科学合理产品的复杂过程中的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine combines the authority of a textbook, the usefulness of a color atlas and the timeliness of a journal. Each issue focuses on a single clinical condition, offering several different management approaches. It''s the easiest way for practitioners to stay informed of the latest surgical advancements and developments.
期刊最新文献
Hip Injuries in the Pediatric Athlete—Pelvic Apophyseal Avulsions Addressing Extra-Articular Impingement in the Athlete Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Getting It Right the Second Time Managing the Hip in Supraphysiologic Motion Athletes Arthroscopic Labral Management: Ignore, Debride, Repair or Reconstruct
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1