Internal Corporate Policy: CSR and Employee Satisfaction.

IF 1.7 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1007/s10672-022-09406-5
Boris Miethlich, Maria Beliakova, Liudmila Voropaeva, Olga Ustyuzhina, Tatiana Yurieva
{"title":"Internal Corporate Policy: CSR and Employee Satisfaction.","authors":"Boris Miethlich, Maria Beliakova, Liudmila Voropaeva, Olga Ustyuzhina, Tatiana Yurieva","doi":"10.1007/s10672-022-09406-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, society has undergone significant changes with implications for employee values and job satisfaction. As a reflection of social needs, corporate social practice is also changing compared to before the pandemic. This paper examines the perception of corporate social practices by personnel and their impact on staff satisfaction. The empirical study carried out in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan allowed the authors to identify social practices that influence the level of personnel satisfaction with professional activity before and after the pandemic. The research determined general tendencies and differences in the perception of social practices with the most significant personnel satisfaction in the period before and after the pandemic. The authors also developed recommendations that should be taken into account when forming corporate social practices. The study's novelty is the investigation of an empirical relationship between the levels of satisfaction with professional activity and implemented social practices in the period before and after the pandemic. The research found that the tendencies in Russia and Kazakhstan are similar to the global trends. Employees before the pandemic were highly satisfied with their activities and corporate social responsibility practices. After the pandemic, when society is disconnected and individualized, employees are focused on material security, and social practices have no significant influence on staff satisfaction. The paper offers recommendations for companies to implement appropriate social practices for the common interests of employers and staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":45566,"journal":{"name":"Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"127-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-022-09406-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, society has undergone significant changes with implications for employee values and job satisfaction. As a reflection of social needs, corporate social practice is also changing compared to before the pandemic. This paper examines the perception of corporate social practices by personnel and their impact on staff satisfaction. The empirical study carried out in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan allowed the authors to identify social practices that influence the level of personnel satisfaction with professional activity before and after the pandemic. The research determined general tendencies and differences in the perception of social practices with the most significant personnel satisfaction in the period before and after the pandemic. The authors also developed recommendations that should be taken into account when forming corporate social practices. The study's novelty is the investigation of an empirical relationship between the levels of satisfaction with professional activity and implemented social practices in the period before and after the pandemic. The research found that the tendencies in Russia and Kazakhstan are similar to the global trends. Employees before the pandemic were highly satisfied with their activities and corporate social responsibility practices. After the pandemic, when society is disconnected and individualized, employees are focused on material security, and social practices have no significant influence on staff satisfaction. The paper offers recommendations for companies to implement appropriate social practices for the common interests of employers and staff.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业内部政策:企业社会责任与员工满意度
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,社会发生了重大变化,对员工价值观和工作满意度产生了影响。作为社会需求的反映,企业社会实践与疫情前相比也在发生变化。本文考察了员工对企业社会实践的看法及其对员工满意度的影响。在俄罗斯联邦和哈萨克斯坦共和国进行的实证研究使作者能够确定在大流行前后影响人员对专业活动满意度的社会习俗。研究确定了疫情前后员工满意度最高的社会实践感知的总体趋势和差异。作者还提出了在形成企业社会实践时应考虑的建议。这项研究的新颖之处在于,它调查了大流行前后对专业活动的满意度与实施的社会实践之间的经验关系。研究发现,俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦的趋势与全球趋势相似。大流行前,员工对他们的活动和企业社会责任实践非常满意。疫情后,在社会脱节、个性化的情况下,员工关注的是物质安全,社会实践对员工满意度的影响不显著。本文为公司实施适当的社会实践提供了建议,以实现雇主和员工的共同利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal fosters development of the field of employee relations by presenting high-quality, peer-reviewed original research articles and by linking practitioner concerns involving the employment relationship with academic rigor. The journal is interdisciplinary in focus, drawing from a broad range of disciplines including ethics, organizational behavior, law, economics, sociology, social psychology, industrial and employment relations, administrative and organizational studies, and philosophy to further the understanding of both employee responsibilities and rights. The journal offers an international forum for the publication of scholarly peer-reviewed original research including qualitative and quantitative empirical studies, case studies, critical commentaries, and conceptual and dialectic presentations. In addition, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal publishes a Perspectives Section that showcases important contributions in formats other than the traditional research article. Such contributions include symposia/roundtable discussions, commentaries, review essays, interviews, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Servant Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Politics and the Moderating Role of Political Skill in Public Service Organizations From Chosen to Forced: A Qualitative Exploration of Nurses’ Experiences With Overtime Mutual Benefits: Delving into Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Pay Dynamics with Social Exchange Theory The Impact of Anti-Sexual Harassment Policies on Sexual Harassment Prevention in the Workplace Introduction to “Employment Situation of Trans People in the Context of the Southern European Welfare Regime: The Case of Turkey”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1