Regulated and Nonregulated Writing: A Qualitative Study of University Custodians’ Workplace Literacy Practices

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in the Teaching of English Pub Date : 2021-02-15 DOI:10.58680/rte202131187
Calley Marotta
{"title":"Regulated and Nonregulated Writing: A Qualitative Study of University Custodians’ Workplace Literacy Practices","authors":"Calley Marotta","doi":"10.58680/rte202131187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing studies scholars have long examined how race- and class-based hierarchies shape teachers’ and students’ experiences of writing in US universities. But universities are also workplaces that profit from a racialized writing economy in which laborers of color () underpin writing production. Drawing from a yearlong qualitative case study that examines the writing practices of university custodial workers, this article addresses the following research questions: What kinds of writing do university custodial workers use and practice? What are the conditions for their writing? And what do these practices and conditions tell us about writing in race- and class-stratified workplaces, including educational institutions? Using critical race (; ; ; ; ; ; ) approaches to literacy sponsorship (), and observations and interviews with university custodians, this article discusses two main findings: (1) labor conditions restrict participants’ writing as a part of race and class hierarchies; and (2) the participants employ writing practices that run under the radar of institutional restrictions to serve their own purposes. This study’s findings have implications for workplace writing scholarship and higher education policy, because they expand definitions of and purposes for workplace writing in institutions of education.","PeriodicalId":47105,"journal":{"name":"Research in the Teaching of English","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in the Teaching of English","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202131187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Writing studies scholars have long examined how race- and class-based hierarchies shape teachers’ and students’ experiences of writing in US universities. But universities are also workplaces that profit from a racialized writing economy in which laborers of color () underpin writing production. Drawing from a yearlong qualitative case study that examines the writing practices of university custodial workers, this article addresses the following research questions: What kinds of writing do university custodial workers use and practice? What are the conditions for their writing? And what do these practices and conditions tell us about writing in race- and class-stratified workplaces, including educational institutions? Using critical race (; ; ; ; ; ; ) approaches to literacy sponsorship (), and observations and interviews with university custodians, this article discusses two main findings: (1) labor conditions restrict participants’ writing as a part of race and class hierarchies; and (2) the participants employ writing practices that run under the radar of institutional restrictions to serve their own purposes. This study’s findings have implications for workplace writing scholarship and higher education policy, because they expand definitions of and purposes for workplace writing in institutions of education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规范与非规范写作:大学管理员职场素养实践的质性研究
写作研究学者们长期以来一直在研究基于种族和阶级的等级制度如何影响美国大学教师和学生的写作体验。但大学也是从种族化的写作经济中获利的工作场所,在这种经济中,有色人种劳动者()支撑着写作生产。本文通过一项为期一年的定性案例研究,考察了大学监护工作者的写作实践,提出了以下研究问题:大学监护工作者使用和实践什么样的写作?他们写作的条件是什么?关于在种族和阶级分层的工作场所(包括教育机构)写作,这些实践和条件告诉了我们什么?本文使用批判性种族(;;;;)方法来赞助扫盲(),并对大学管理者进行观察和采访,讨论了两个主要发现:(1)劳动条件限制了参与者的写作,将其作为种族和阶级等级的一部分;以及(2)参与者采用在制度限制的雷达下运行的写作实践来服务于他们自己的目的。这项研究的发现对职场写作学术和高等教育政策具有启示意义,因为它们扩展了教育机构职场写作的定义和目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in the Teaching of English
Research in the Teaching of English EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Research in the Teaching of English (RTE) is a broad-based, multidisciplinary journal composed of original research articles and short scholarly essays on a wide range of topics significant to those concerned with the teaching and learning of languages and literacies around the world, both in and beyond schools and universities.
期刊最新文献
Opening Up Research on the Teaching of Reading by Looking beyond US Borders: What We Might Learn from Early Literacy Instruction in China Literacy Research, Systems Thinking, and Climate Change A Brave New World Requires Courage: New Directions for Literacy Research and Teaching Literacy Research and Its Relationship with Policy: What and Who Informs Policy and Why Is Some Research Ignored? Curriculum-as-Assemblage: Transgressive (Re)Imaginings in English and Literacies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1