Digital Image Classification: a Comparison of Classic Methods for Land Cover and Land Use Mapping

A. M. Santos, Nadyelle Curcino do Carmo, Fabrizia Gioppo Nunes, Larissa Andrade de Aguiar, Carlos Fabricio Assunção da Silva
{"title":"Digital Image Classification: a Comparison of Classic Methods for Land Cover and Land Use Mapping","authors":"A. M. Santos, Nadyelle Curcino do Carmo, Fabrizia Gioppo Nunes, Larissa Andrade de Aguiar, Carlos Fabricio Assunção da Silva","doi":"10.11137/1982-3908_2022_45_47481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the classification of images for land cover and land use mapping, several methods can be applied, however, they can present different results in relation to field truth. Therefore, the objective of this work was to test techniques for classifying high spatial digital images obtained from the Google Earth Pro® platform. The images refer to a section of the Federal University of Goias, campus Samambaia Goiania - GO, Brazil. Classification tests were performed on the images obtained, using two classifiers per region and two classifiers per pixel, both available free of charge, in the Spring software of the National Institute for Space Research (INPE / Brazil). For the analysis of the quality of the classifications, the results were compared to a survey by direct method, in this case the topographic one, seeking to identify which classifier came closest to the field truth. The classification that presented the best performance and class separability was the Bhattacharya, with Global Accuracy of 0.85. Bhattacharya was also the classifier that came closest in terms of measured areas, by the topographic survey, with the areas of the “zinc roofing” use class, analyzed and calculated.","PeriodicalId":39973,"journal":{"name":"Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11137/1982-3908_2022_45_47481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the classification of images for land cover and land use mapping, several methods can be applied, however, they can present different results in relation to field truth. Therefore, the objective of this work was to test techniques for classifying high spatial digital images obtained from the Google Earth Pro® platform. The images refer to a section of the Federal University of Goias, campus Samambaia Goiania - GO, Brazil. Classification tests were performed on the images obtained, using two classifiers per region and two classifiers per pixel, both available free of charge, in the Spring software of the National Institute for Space Research (INPE / Brazil). For the analysis of the quality of the classifications, the results were compared to a survey by direct method, in this case the topographic one, seeking to identify which classifier came closest to the field truth. The classification that presented the best performance and class separability was the Bhattacharya, with Global Accuracy of 0.85. Bhattacharya was also the classifier that came closest in terms of measured areas, by the topographic survey, with the areas of the “zinc roofing” use class, analyzed and calculated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字图像分类:土地覆盖与土地利用制图经典方法的比较
在土地覆盖和土地利用制图的图像分类中,可以应用几种方法,但它们可能会根据实地情况呈现不同的结果。因此,这项工作的目的是测试对从Google Earth Pro®平台获得的高空间数字图像进行分类的技术。这些图片指的是巴西戈亚斯联邦大学Samambaia Goiania-GO校区的一部分。在国家空间研究所(INPE/巴西)的Spring软件中,使用每个区域两个分类器和每个像素两个分类器对获得的图像进行了分类测试,这两个分类器都是免费提供的。为了分析分类的质量,将结果与直接方法(在本例中为地形法)的调查结果进行了比较,以确定哪种分类器最接近现场实况。表现出最佳性能和类可分性的分类是Bhattacharya,全局准确度为0.85。Bhattacharya也是地形测量中测量面积与分析和计算的“锌屋顶”使用类别面积最接近的分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias
Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Anuário IGEO) is an official publication of the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ – CCMN) with the objective to publish original scientific papers of broad interest in the field of Geology, Paleontology, Geography and Meteorology.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Precipitation Simulations at the Subseasonal Range in the Sao Francisco River Basin, Brazil Classification of Urban Solid Waste Collected with the Use of Ecobarriers in Watercourses in the Municipality of Caçapava do Sul, RS How Eco-Spatial Edutourism Support Sustainability in Coastal Areas in South Malang, Indonesia? Semiautomatic Mapping of Center Pivot Irrigated Areas Using Sentinel-2 Images and GEOBIA Approach Characterization and Geological Meaning of the Crystalline Basement Occurrence in the Unaí Region, Minas Gerais State (Central Brasilia Belt)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1