Providing trauma-informed pediatric care for underserved populations: Reflections on a teaching intervention

Q2 Social Sciences Developmental Child Welfare Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1177/2516103219894599
Sandra H. Jee, Anne-Marie Conn, Andrea Milne-Wenderlich, C. Krafft, Michael Chen, M. Steen, J. T. Manly
{"title":"Providing trauma-informed pediatric care for underserved populations: Reflections on a teaching intervention","authors":"Sandra H. Jee, Anne-Marie Conn, Andrea Milne-Wenderlich, C. Krafft, Michael Chen, M. Steen, J. T. Manly","doi":"10.1177/2516103219894599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National organizations call for providing trauma-informed care (TIC) to those who have experienced adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and to the population as a whole. All providers and staff are at risk for experiencing stress and burnout when they care for patients with multiple complex needs and insufficient resources. All are at risk but not all develop burnout. This study shares findings from a pilot project to implement training on ACEs and toxic stress in a busy urban pediatric primary care practice. Using a mixed-methods approach, we assessed pre and post self-reported knowledge and attitudes via surveys (n = 52), baseline in-depth interviews (n = 16), focus groups (three groups, n = 36), and follow-up interviews (n = 13). After training, staff reported a marginally significant increase in rating the office as doing a good job meeting the needs of families around childhood trauma (72% vs. 46%, p = 0.057). Key themes from baseline in-depth interviews and focus groups identified the following: (1) pervasiveness of trauma and adversity among families in the practice, (2) empathy for families with significant social needs, (3) feelings of frustration to alleviate stressors identified during visits, (4) need for social support and coping mechanisms to alleviate workplace stress, and (5) receptiveness to enhance knowledge and understanding. Key themes from follow-up interviews and focus groups highlighted the impact of compassion fatigue and strategies to promote self-care. We discuss these findings and challenges in relation to providing TIC and professional development.","PeriodicalId":36239,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Child Welfare","volume":"2 1","pages":"21 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2516103219894599","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Child Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516103219894599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

National organizations call for providing trauma-informed care (TIC) to those who have experienced adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and to the population as a whole. All providers and staff are at risk for experiencing stress and burnout when they care for patients with multiple complex needs and insufficient resources. All are at risk but not all develop burnout. This study shares findings from a pilot project to implement training on ACEs and toxic stress in a busy urban pediatric primary care practice. Using a mixed-methods approach, we assessed pre and post self-reported knowledge and attitudes via surveys (n = 52), baseline in-depth interviews (n = 16), focus groups (three groups, n = 36), and follow-up interviews (n = 13). After training, staff reported a marginally significant increase in rating the office as doing a good job meeting the needs of families around childhood trauma (72% vs. 46%, p = 0.057). Key themes from baseline in-depth interviews and focus groups identified the following: (1) pervasiveness of trauma and adversity among families in the practice, (2) empathy for families with significant social needs, (3) feelings of frustration to alleviate stressors identified during visits, (4) need for social support and coping mechanisms to alleviate workplace stress, and (5) receptiveness to enhance knowledge and understanding. Key themes from follow-up interviews and focus groups highlighted the impact of compassion fatigue and strategies to promote self-care. We discuss these findings and challenges in relation to providing TIC and professional development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为服务不足的人群提供创伤知情的儿科护理:对教学干预的反思
国家组织呼吁为那些经历过不良童年经历的人以及整个人群提供创伤知情护理(TIC)。在照顾有多种复杂需求和资源不足的患者时,所有提供者和工作人员都面临着压力和倦怠的风险。所有人都有风险,但并不是所有人都会倦怠。本研究分享了在繁忙的城市儿科初级保健实践中实施ace和毒性应激培训的试点项目的结果。采用混合方法,我们通过调查(n = 52)、基线深度访谈(n = 16)、焦点小组(3组,n = 36)和随访访谈(n = 13)评估了前后自我报告的知识和态度。培训后,员工报告说,办公室在满足儿童创伤家庭需求方面做得很好(72%对46%,p = 0.057),这一比例略有显著提高。基线深度访谈和焦点小组的关键主题确定了以下内容:(1)实践中家庭创伤和逆境的普遍性;(2)对有重大社会需求的家庭的同理心;(3)缓解访问中发现的压力源的挫败感;(4)缓解工作压力的社会支持和应对机制的需求;(5)增强知识和理解的接受性。后续访谈和焦点小组的主要主题强调了同情疲劳的影响和促进自我照顾的策略。我们将讨论这些发现和与提供议会和专业发展有关的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Child Welfare
Developmental Child Welfare Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 measures on the lives of unaccompanied refugee minors Preparedness for adulthood among young adults with histories of out-of-home care Evaluating the impact of attachment and trauma training for children’s social care teams Evaluating the impact of attachment and trauma training for children’s social care teams Cumulative risk exposure is associated with increased risk for PTSD but not depression or anxiety. Results from a UK clinical sample of children and adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1