{"title":"Metasynthesis of Research in Mathematics Education: Foci and Theoretical-Methodological Foundations","authors":"Saddo Ag Almouloud","doi":"10.54870/1551-3440.1531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I carry out a qualitative metasynthesis of six doctoral theses that were directed by me, identifying the theoretical and methodological frameworks that support these researches, and how the articulations were made between different theories chosen. I also revisit the results achieved by the studies to highlight their relevance to the Mathematics Education area. This study, although not exhaustive, provides a vision of possible dialogs of Mathematics Education (or education) theories related to teaching and learning of mathematics and the Didactics of Mathematics. The diversity of theories and the specificities of each of them confirm the idea that a single theoretical tendency, or a single model, hardly ever explains and makes explicit all the phenomena involved in the teaching and learning processes of mathematical concepts. All the research works analyzed were used to study the epistemological, ecological, and economic dimensions, to identify the different forms of conceptions of a given mathematical object to help them in the didactic analysis of the findings. This study allowed us to identify, among other aspects, the reasons for being of the mathematical objects and the problems of their teaching. For teacher education, all mapped research, except one, has been supported in teacher education trajectories. The objective of these investigations is to familiarise teachers in initial or continuing education with these training trajectories as a didactic device that has the potential for their professional development, preparing them for an effective transition from the monumentalist paradigm to the world’s questioning paradigm. For the teachers’ training, the researchers presented didactic devices not based solely on the monumentalist paradigm, and somehow resorted to devices with PEP-FP-type structure.","PeriodicalId":44703,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics Enthusiast","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics Enthusiast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, I carry out a qualitative metasynthesis of six doctoral theses that were directed by me, identifying the theoretical and methodological frameworks that support these researches, and how the articulations were made between different theories chosen. I also revisit the results achieved by the studies to highlight their relevance to the Mathematics Education area. This study, although not exhaustive, provides a vision of possible dialogs of Mathematics Education (or education) theories related to teaching and learning of mathematics and the Didactics of Mathematics. The diversity of theories and the specificities of each of them confirm the idea that a single theoretical tendency, or a single model, hardly ever explains and makes explicit all the phenomena involved in the teaching and learning processes of mathematical concepts. All the research works analyzed were used to study the epistemological, ecological, and economic dimensions, to identify the different forms of conceptions of a given mathematical object to help them in the didactic analysis of the findings. This study allowed us to identify, among other aspects, the reasons for being of the mathematical objects and the problems of their teaching. For teacher education, all mapped research, except one, has been supported in teacher education trajectories. The objective of these investigations is to familiarise teachers in initial or continuing education with these training trajectories as a didactic device that has the potential for their professional development, preparing them for an effective transition from the monumentalist paradigm to the world’s questioning paradigm. For the teachers’ training, the researchers presented didactic devices not based solely on the monumentalist paradigm, and somehow resorted to devices with PEP-FP-type structure.
期刊介绍:
The Mathematics Enthusiast (TME) is an eclectic internationally circulated peer reviewed journal which focuses on mathematics content, mathematics education research, innovation, interdisciplinary issues and pedagogy. The journal exists as an independent entity. The electronic version is hosted by the Department of Mathematical Sciences- University of Montana. The journal is NOT affiliated to nor subsidized by any professional organizations but supports PMENA [Psychology of Mathematics Education- North America] through special issues on various research topics. TME strives to promote equity internationally by adopting an open access policy, as well as allowing authors to retain full copyright of their scholarship contingent on the journals’ publication ethics guidelines. Authors do not need to be affiliated with the University of Montana in order to publish in this journal. Journal articles cover a wide spectrum of topics such as mathematics content (including advanced mathematics), educational studies related to mathematics, and reports of innovative pedagogical practices with the hope of stimulating dialogue between pre-service and practicing teachers, university educators and mathematicians. The journal is interested in research based articles as well as historical, philosophical, political, cross-cultural and systems perspectives on mathematics content, its teaching and learning. The journal also includes a monograph series on special topics of interest to the community of readers.