Metasynthesis of Research in Mathematics Education: Foci and Theoretical-Methodological Foundations

IF 0.3 Q4 MATHEMATICS Mathematics Enthusiast Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.54870/1551-3440.1531
Saddo Ag Almouloud
{"title":"Metasynthesis of Research in Mathematics Education: Foci and Theoretical-Methodological Foundations","authors":"Saddo Ag Almouloud","doi":"10.54870/1551-3440.1531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I carry out a qualitative metasynthesis of six doctoral theses that were directed by me, identifying the theoretical and methodological frameworks that support these researches, and how the articulations were made between different theories chosen. I also revisit the results achieved by the studies to highlight their relevance to the Mathematics Education area. This study, although not exhaustive, provides a vision of possible dialogs of Mathematics Education (or education) theories related to teaching and learning of mathematics and the Didactics of Mathematics. The diversity of theories and the specificities of each of them confirm the idea that a single theoretical tendency, or a single model, hardly ever explains and makes explicit all the phenomena involved in the teaching and learning processes of mathematical concepts. All the research works analyzed were used to study the epistemological, ecological, and economic dimensions, to identify the different forms of conceptions of a given mathematical object to help them in the didactic analysis of the findings. This study allowed us to identify, among other aspects, the reasons for being of the mathematical objects and the problems of their teaching. For teacher education, all mapped research, except one, has been supported in teacher education trajectories. The objective of these investigations is to familiarise teachers in initial or continuing education with these training trajectories as a didactic device that has the potential for their professional development, preparing them for an effective transition from the monumentalist paradigm to the world’s questioning paradigm. For the teachers’ training, the researchers presented didactic devices not based solely on the monumentalist paradigm, and somehow resorted to devices with PEP-FP-type structure.","PeriodicalId":44703,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics Enthusiast","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics Enthusiast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, I carry out a qualitative metasynthesis of six doctoral theses that were directed by me, identifying the theoretical and methodological frameworks that support these researches, and how the articulations were made between different theories chosen. I also revisit the results achieved by the studies to highlight their relevance to the Mathematics Education area. This study, although not exhaustive, provides a vision of possible dialogs of Mathematics Education (or education) theories related to teaching and learning of mathematics and the Didactics of Mathematics. The diversity of theories and the specificities of each of them confirm the idea that a single theoretical tendency, or a single model, hardly ever explains and makes explicit all the phenomena involved in the teaching and learning processes of mathematical concepts. All the research works analyzed were used to study the epistemological, ecological, and economic dimensions, to identify the different forms of conceptions of a given mathematical object to help them in the didactic analysis of the findings. This study allowed us to identify, among other aspects, the reasons for being of the mathematical objects and the problems of their teaching. For teacher education, all mapped research, except one, has been supported in teacher education trajectories. The objective of these investigations is to familiarise teachers in initial or continuing education with these training trajectories as a didactic device that has the potential for their professional development, preparing them for an effective transition from the monumentalist paradigm to the world’s questioning paradigm. For the teachers’ training, the researchers presented didactic devices not based solely on the monumentalist paradigm, and somehow resorted to devices with PEP-FP-type structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数学教育研究的元综合:焦点与理论方法论基础
在这篇文章中,我对我指导的六篇博士论文进行了定性的综合,确定了支持这些研究的理论和方法框架,以及如何在选择的不同理论之间进行衔接。我还回顾了这些研究取得的结果,以突出它们与数学教育领域的相关性。这项研究,虽然不是详尽的,但提供了与数学教学和数学教学相关的数学教育(或教育)理论可能对话的愿景。理论的多样性和每个理论的特殊性证实了这样一种观点,即单一的理论倾向或单一的模型几乎无法解释和明确数学概念教学过程中涉及的所有现象。所分析的所有研究工作都用于研究认识论、生态和经济维度,以确定给定数学对象的不同形式的概念,以帮助他们对研究结果进行教学分析。这项研究使我们能够在其他方面确定数学对象存在的原因及其教学中的问题。在教师教育方面,除了一项研究之外,所有的地图研究都得到了教师教育轨迹的支持。这些调查的目的是让接受初级教育或继续教育的教师熟悉这些培训轨迹,将其作为一种教学手段,有可能促进他们的专业发展,为他们从纪念碑主义范式向世界质疑范式的有效过渡做好准备。对于教师的培训,研究者提出了不完全基于纪念碑主义范式的教学手段,并在某种程度上采用了pep - fp型结构的教学手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematics Enthusiast
Mathematics Enthusiast MATHEMATICS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Mathematics Enthusiast (TME) is an eclectic internationally circulated peer reviewed journal which focuses on mathematics content, mathematics education research, innovation, interdisciplinary issues and pedagogy. The journal exists as an independent entity. The electronic version is hosted by the Department of Mathematical Sciences- University of Montana. The journal is NOT affiliated to nor subsidized by any professional organizations but supports PMENA [Psychology of Mathematics Education- North America] through special issues on various research topics. TME strives to promote equity internationally by adopting an open access policy, as well as allowing authors to retain full copyright of their scholarship contingent on the journals’ publication ethics guidelines. Authors do not need to be affiliated with the University of Montana in order to publish in this journal. Journal articles cover a wide spectrum of topics such as mathematics content (including advanced mathematics), educational studies related to mathematics, and reports of innovative pedagogical practices with the hope of stimulating dialogue between pre-service and practicing teachers, university educators and mathematicians. The journal is interested in research based articles as well as historical, philosophical, political, cross-cultural and systems perspectives on mathematics content, its teaching and learning. The journal also includes a monograph series on special topics of interest to the community of readers.
期刊最新文献
Stepping Stone Problem on Graphs Using Gardner's Three-Squares Problem for a Group Project in a Mathematical Problem Solving Module On Convincing Power of Counterexamples Numerate Life for Whom? A Non-book-review of John Allen Paulos’s A Numerate Life: Mathematician Explores the Vagaries of Life, His Own and Probably Yours Popularizing Mathematics Education Through Bad Drawings A Review of Ben Orlin’s Math with Bad Drawings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1