{"title":"O Give Me a Home","authors":"Patrick McCreless","doi":"10.1093/mts/mtac024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This essay examines Stephen Lett’s (2023) critique of North American music theory in general, and of the Society for Music Theory in particular, from the point of view of the binary inclusion/exclusion. Drawing on my own experience, I acknowledge that in many respects his critique of the Society for Music Theory (SMT), from its very inception, as creating an exclusionary, “stratified” space, is on target. Yet I contest his reading of the history and current functioning of the Society and of the broader discipline as a wholesale enterprise of coloniality. Although he insists that this metaphor, as applied to the SMT, is not to be read as involving the type of violence inflicted by colonial powers on native peoples, his consistent, governing language of displacement, pushing out, building fences, and defending territory, belies this denial, and produces a narrative that often suggests a level of hostility incompatible with both history and current experience.","PeriodicalId":44994,"journal":{"name":"MUSIC THEORY SPECTRUM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSIC THEORY SPECTRUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mts/mtac024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay examines Stephen Lett’s (2023) critique of North American music theory in general, and of the Society for Music Theory in particular, from the point of view of the binary inclusion/exclusion. Drawing on my own experience, I acknowledge that in many respects his critique of the Society for Music Theory (SMT), from its very inception, as creating an exclusionary, “stratified” space, is on target. Yet I contest his reading of the history and current functioning of the Society and of the broader discipline as a wholesale enterprise of coloniality. Although he insists that this metaphor, as applied to the SMT, is not to be read as involving the type of violence inflicted by colonial powers on native peoples, his consistent, governing language of displacement, pushing out, building fences, and defending territory, belies this denial, and produces a narrative that often suggests a level of hostility incompatible with both history and current experience.
期刊介绍:
A leading journal in the field and an official publication of the Society for Music Theory, Music Theory Spectrum features articles on a wide range of topics in music theory and analysis, including aesthetics, critical theory and hermeneutics, history of theory, post-tonal theory, linear analysis, rhythm, music cognition, and the analysis of popular musics. The journal welcomes interdisciplinary articles revealing intersections with topics in other fields such as ethnomusicology, mathematics, musicology, philosophy, psychology, and performance. For further information about Music Theory Spectrum, please visit the Society for Music Theory homepage.