Georgios Theotokis, Byzantine Military Tactics in Syria and Mesopotamia in the Tenth Century. A Comparative Study, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 2018, pp. 348.

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Studia Ceranea Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI:10.18778/2084-140x.10.29
Ł. Różycki
{"title":"Georgios Theotokis, Byzantine Military Tactics in Syria and Mesopotamia in the Tenth Century. A Comparative Study, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 2018, pp. 348.","authors":"Ł. Różycki","doi":"10.18778/2084-140x.10.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he reviewed book was written by Georgios Theotokis, a military historian who graduated from University of Glasgow, and is currently teaching history at the Ibn Haldun University in Turkey. The author belongs to a new generation of scholars dealing with the history of Byzantine warcraft, with particular focus on the reign of the Macedonian dynasty and on military theory. He has written two monographs, numerous well-received articles and has edited a number of collective works. It is worth emphasizing that although the 10th century is a rather popular period among Byzantine scholars, the reviewed piece is the first such comprehensive attempt to analyze the Byzantine tactics of the 10th century since the publishing of Eric McGeer’s work1. After a well-written methodological introduction, the author quickly moves on to the actual analysis in the chapter entitled The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire, which is a clear reference to the controversial works by Edward N. Luttwak2. Fortunately, G. Theotokis does not try and prove the existence of any grand strategy planned for generations in advance, focusing rather on the strategic importance of the Empire’s eastern provinces. The first chapter also includes deliberations on the difference between tactics and strategy, and on the various attitudes to warfare adopted by mercenary forces, with a clear juxtaposition of the culture of bravery represented by west-","PeriodicalId":40873,"journal":{"name":"Studia Ceranea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Ceranea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140x.10.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T he reviewed book was written by Georgios Theotokis, a military historian who graduated from University of Glasgow, and is currently teaching history at the Ibn Haldun University in Turkey. The author belongs to a new generation of scholars dealing with the history of Byzantine warcraft, with particular focus on the reign of the Macedonian dynasty and on military theory. He has written two monographs, numerous well-received articles and has edited a number of collective works. It is worth emphasizing that although the 10th century is a rather popular period among Byzantine scholars, the reviewed piece is the first such comprehensive attempt to analyze the Byzantine tactics of the 10th century since the publishing of Eric McGeer’s work1. After a well-written methodological introduction, the author quickly moves on to the actual analysis in the chapter entitled The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire, which is a clear reference to the controversial works by Edward N. Luttwak2. Fortunately, G. Theotokis does not try and prove the existence of any grand strategy planned for generations in advance, focusing rather on the strategic importance of the Empire’s eastern provinces. The first chapter also includes deliberations on the difference between tactics and strategy, and on the various attitudes to warfare adopted by mercenary forces, with a clear juxtaposition of the culture of bravery represented by west-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这本书评由乔治奥斯·西奥托基斯撰写,他是一位军事历史学家,毕业于格拉斯哥大学,目前在土耳其伊本哈尔顿大学教授历史。作者属于研究拜占庭战争史的新一代学者,特别关注马其顿王朝的统治和军事理论。他撰写了两部专著,发表了许多广受好评的文章,并编辑了许多集体作品。值得强调的是,尽管10世纪在拜占庭学者中是一个相当流行的时期,但这篇评论文章是自埃里克·麦吉尔的作品1出版以来,首次对10世纪拜占庭战术进行全面分析。在一篇写得很好的方法论介绍之后,作者很快在题为《拜占庭帝国的大战略》的一章中进行了实际分析,该章明确引用了爱德华·N·卢特瓦克2的有争议的作品。幸运的是,G.Theotokis没有试图证明任何提前几代人计划的大战略的存在,而是专注于帝国东部省份的战略重要性。第一章还讨论了战术和战略之间的差异,以及雇佣军对战争采取的各种态度,并明确并列了以西方为代表的勇敢文化-
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Ceranea
Studia Ceranea HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hymnography in Honour of Saints Constantine and Helena and its Connection with Imperial Ideology The Jewish Theme in Theophanes the Confessor’s Testimony on the Prophet Muḥammad Justinian, Pilgrimages and the Theotokos: Imperial Propaganda in De Aedificiis V Basil I’s Path to Power according to the Vita Basilii as a Heroic Myth Representing the Phlegm: the Portrait of the Phlegmatic in Cesare Ripa’s Iconology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1