Patient and family advisory councils (PFAC) feedback as the voice of health care consumers

Cortney D Forward, Cynthia J. Sieck
{"title":"Patient and family advisory councils (PFAC) feedback as the voice of health care consumers","authors":"Cortney D Forward, Cynthia J. Sieck","doi":"10.21037/jhmhp-20-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Throughout the U.S., healthcare organizations continuously find ways to incorporate patient feedback with efforts to advance the delivery of patient-centered care. Patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) can be used as a strategy to better understand and honor the patient experience and improve care delivery thanks to patient input to obtain patient perspectives. The importance of formal efforts to incorporate the patient perspective is highlighted by the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) program implemented by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services which requires organizations to establish PFACs to receive funding. Site support for PFACs included a patient experience manager who oversaw recruitment and facilitated each clinic’s council meetings. Other support personnel consisted of the practice manager, physicians, care coordinators, and advanced practice providers. This study employed a leadership framework to better understand how health care organizations use PFACs to discover and define patient/family advisors perspectives and how they can be related to different styles of leadership continually evolving. This study surrounding the experiences of patient/family advisors and PFACs can be used for further research and to gain a better understanding of this topic. This research presented patient/ family advisors experiences, working together on patient family advisory councils with health care leaders, staff, providers, and managers, signaling the distinctive experiences of these participants which merits additional examination. There is further need for a meaningful discussion concerning the distinctive way doctors, providers and patients perceive the importance and meaning of medical encounters and patient and family engagement strategies.","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-20-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Throughout the U.S., healthcare organizations continuously find ways to incorporate patient feedback with efforts to advance the delivery of patient-centered care. Patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) can be used as a strategy to better understand and honor the patient experience and improve care delivery thanks to patient input to obtain patient perspectives. The importance of formal efforts to incorporate the patient perspective is highlighted by the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) program implemented by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services which requires organizations to establish PFACs to receive funding. Site support for PFACs included a patient experience manager who oversaw recruitment and facilitated each clinic’s council meetings. Other support personnel consisted of the practice manager, physicians, care coordinators, and advanced practice providers. This study employed a leadership framework to better understand how health care organizations use PFACs to discover and define patient/family advisors perspectives and how they can be related to different styles of leadership continually evolving. This study surrounding the experiences of patient/family advisors and PFACs can be used for further research and to gain a better understanding of this topic. This research presented patient/ family advisors experiences, working together on patient family advisory councils with health care leaders, staff, providers, and managers, signaling the distinctive experiences of these participants which merits additional examination. There is further need for a meaningful discussion concerning the distinctive way doctors, providers and patients perceive the importance and meaning of medical encounters and patient and family engagement strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者和家属咨询委员会(PFAC)的反馈作为卫生保健消费者的声音
背景:在整个美国,医疗保健组织不断寻找方法,将患者反馈与努力推进以患者为中心的护理相结合。患者和家属咨询委员会(PFACs)可以作为一种策略,更好地理解和尊重患者的经验,并通过患者的意见来改善护理服务,以获得患者的观点。由医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心实施的综合初级保健+ (CPC+)项目强调了正式努力纳入患者观点的重要性,该项目要求各组织建立PFACs以获得资金。PFACs的现场支持包括一名患者体验经理,他负责监督招聘并促进每个诊所的理事会会议。其他支持人员包括实践经理、医生、护理协调员和高级实践提供者。本研究采用了一个领导力框架来更好地理解医疗机构如何使用PFACs来发现和定义患者/家庭顾问的观点,以及它们如何与不断发展的不同风格的领导相关联。本研究围绕患者/家庭顾问和PFACs的经验进行,可以用于进一步的研究,并更好地理解这一主题。本研究展示了患者/家庭顾问的经验,与医疗保健领导者、员工、提供者和管理人员一起在患者家庭咨询委员会工作,表明这些参与者的独特经验值得进一步研究。还需要就医生、提供者和患者对医疗接触的重要性和意义以及患者和家庭参与战略的独特看法进行有意义的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1