Finding the One: Ease of Candidate Choices in High Information Open‐List PR Systems

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Scandinavian Political Studies Pub Date : 2021-06-14 DOI:10.1111/1467-9477.12210
Theodora Järvi, Mikko Mattila, Åsa Schoultz
{"title":"Finding the One: Ease of Candidate Choices in High Information Open‐List PR Systems","authors":"Theodora Järvi, Mikko Mattila, Åsa Schoultz","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vote choice in an open- list proportional representation (OLPR) electoral system can be considered a complex process. In systems where votes are cast for individual candidates the choice is complicated by the large number of candidates, the two layers of competition involving both individual candidates and parties, and the amount of information required to make an informed choice. Hence, voters are expected to apply strategies to narrow down the pool of candidates from which the actual choice is made, that is, to create a delimited consideration set using cognitive heuristics. The types of strategies that facilitate voters’ candidate choice are studied. More specifically, the voters’ perceptions of the ease with which they choose their candidate and how this is related to three decision- making patterns are studied: the party- centric, in which the voter looks for party- related and ideological cues; the socio- normative, in which the voter considers their social in- group; and the candidate- related, in which the voter puts emphasis on specific features of the candidates, such as political experience, age and gender. Our study is situated in the Finnish OLPR system, characterized by many candidates, intense intra- party competition and mandatory preferential voting. Using data from the 2019 Finnish National Election Study and ordinal probit selection models, the mechanisms that facilitate the ease of candidate choice are outlined. Our findings suggest that voters feeling close to a political party and knowing the candidate personally or through friends or family perceive their candidate choice as easier.","PeriodicalId":51572,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Political Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-9477.12210","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Vote choice in an open- list proportional representation (OLPR) electoral system can be considered a complex process. In systems where votes are cast for individual candidates the choice is complicated by the large number of candidates, the two layers of competition involving both individual candidates and parties, and the amount of information required to make an informed choice. Hence, voters are expected to apply strategies to narrow down the pool of candidates from which the actual choice is made, that is, to create a delimited consideration set using cognitive heuristics. The types of strategies that facilitate voters’ candidate choice are studied. More specifically, the voters’ perceptions of the ease with which they choose their candidate and how this is related to three decision- making patterns are studied: the party- centric, in which the voter looks for party- related and ideological cues; the socio- normative, in which the voter considers their social in- group; and the candidate- related, in which the voter puts emphasis on specific features of the candidates, such as political experience, age and gender. Our study is situated in the Finnish OLPR system, characterized by many candidates, intense intra- party competition and mandatory preferential voting. Using data from the 2019 Finnish National Election Study and ordinal probit selection models, the mechanisms that facilitate the ease of candidate choice are outlined. Our findings suggest that voters feeling close to a political party and knowing the candidate personally or through friends or family perceive their candidate choice as easier.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找一个:在高信息公开列表公关系统中候选人选择的便利性
在开放名单比例代表制(OLPR)选举制度中,投票选择可以被认为是一个复杂的过程。在将选票投给个人候选人的制度中,由于候选人人数众多,两层竞争涉及个人候选人和政党,以及做出知情选择所需的大量信息,选择变得复杂。因此,选民应该运用策略来缩小实际选择的候选人范围,也就是说,使用认知启发式来创建一个限定的考虑集。研究了促进选民选择候选人的策略类型。更具体地说,研究了选民对他们选择候选人的难易程度的看法,以及这与三种决策模式的关系:以政党为中心,选民寻找与政党有关的和意识形态的线索;社会规范性,即选民考虑自己的社会群体;与候选人相关的,选民强调候选人的具体特征,如政治经历、年龄和性别。我们的研究是在芬兰的OLPR系统中进行的,其特点是候选人多,党内竞争激烈,强制性优先投票。利用2019年芬兰全国选举研究的数据和有序概率选择模型,概述了促进候选人选择便利性的机制。我们的研究结果表明,与一个政党关系密切、个人或通过朋友或家人了解候选人的选民会更容易选择候选人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Political Studies
Scandinavian Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Political Studies is the only English language political science journal from Scandinavia. The journal publishes widely on policy and electoral issues affecting the Scandinavian countries, and sets those issues in European and global context. Scandinavian Political Studies is an indispensable source for all those researching and teaching in Scandinavian political science, public policy and electoral analysis.
期刊最新文献
The Scandinavian states' staffing of the United Nations‐system “Ideology and Religion” how left‐right ideology plays a key role in attitudes toward Israel and Palestine in Sweden Bottom‐up foreign policy? Finland, NATO and public opinion Aligning working‐class interests and preferences: The case of inheritance tax Same but different: On continuity and change in agricultural policy reforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1