Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome Exhibit Insufficient Previous Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Prospective, Observational, Single-Center Study

C. Siafarikas, S. Liatis, C. Kapelios, M. Skouloudi, M. Bonou, J. Barbetseas
{"title":"Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome Exhibit Insufficient Previous Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Prospective, Observational, Single-Center Study","authors":"C. Siafarikas, S. Liatis, C. Kapelios, M. Skouloudi, M. Bonou, J. Barbetseas","doi":"10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Optimal regulation of modifiable risk factors, has been proposed as the standard of care, both for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to investigate at what extent individuals who experienced an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) had previously been receiving adequate preventive measures against classical risk factors for CVD. \nMethods: Data were analysed for all 185 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of ACS in the Cardiology department of our hospital during an annual period (1/7/2019 until 30/6/2020). The study population was divided into two groups, primary and secondary prevention subgroups, according to the previous medical history of CAD.\nResults: The mean age of the participants was 65.5 ±12.2 years and most patients were male (81.6%). Fifty-seven patients (30.8%) had a history of diabetes mellitus (DM) and 97 (52.4%) had a history of dyslipidemia. Hypertension was present in 101 (54.6%) patients and coronary artery disease (CAD) in 51 (27.9%). In the secondary prevention group, the LDL-C was on target in only one-third, while one out of 5 patients did not use statins. The use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents was 94.5%. Among patients with diabetes, only one out of five patients had been using a GLP-1 receptor agonist or/and an SGLT-2 inhibitor, while the HbA1c was on target in half of them. One-quarter of the patients were active smokers. In the primary prevention group, the use of statins was overall low (25.8%) but more frequent in patients with diabetes and those without diabetes at very high-risk (47.1% and 32.1%, respectively). Overall, the LDL-C was on target in less than one-quarter of patients. The use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents was low (20.1%), but higher in those with diabetes (52.9%). In the diabetic group, HbA1c was on target at 61.8%. Active smoking was practiced by more than one-third of the patients.\nConclusion: Our data show that in a substantial proportion of patients presenting with ACS, previous CVD prevention, both primary and secondary, fails to meet the current recommendations provided by scientific societies.","PeriodicalId":93027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Optimal regulation of modifiable risk factors, has been proposed as the standard of care, both for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to investigate at what extent individuals who experienced an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) had previously been receiving adequate preventive measures against classical risk factors for CVD. Methods: Data were analysed for all 185 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of ACS in the Cardiology department of our hospital during an annual period (1/7/2019 until 30/6/2020). The study population was divided into two groups, primary and secondary prevention subgroups, according to the previous medical history of CAD. Results: The mean age of the participants was 65.5 ±12.2 years and most patients were male (81.6%). Fifty-seven patients (30.8%) had a history of diabetes mellitus (DM) and 97 (52.4%) had a history of dyslipidemia. Hypertension was present in 101 (54.6%) patients and coronary artery disease (CAD) in 51 (27.9%). In the secondary prevention group, the LDL-C was on target in only one-third, while one out of 5 patients did not use statins. The use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents was 94.5%. Among patients with diabetes, only one out of five patients had been using a GLP-1 receptor agonist or/and an SGLT-2 inhibitor, while the HbA1c was on target in half of them. One-quarter of the patients were active smokers. In the primary prevention group, the use of statins was overall low (25.8%) but more frequent in patients with diabetes and those without diabetes at very high-risk (47.1% and 32.1%, respectively). Overall, the LDL-C was on target in less than one-quarter of patients. The use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents was low (20.1%), but higher in those with diabetes (52.9%). In the diabetic group, HbA1c was on target at 61.8%. Active smoking was practiced by more than one-third of the patients. Conclusion: Our data show that in a substantial proportion of patients presenting with ACS, previous CVD prevention, both primary and secondary, fails to meet the current recommendations provided by scientific societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性冠脉综合征患者既往心血管危险因素管理不足:一项前瞻性、观察性、单中心研究
目的:心血管疾病(CVD)的一级和二级预防已提出对可改变危险因素的最佳调节作为护理标准。本研究的目的是调查急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者在多大程度上接受了针对CVD经典危险因素的充分预防措施。方法:对我院心内科每年(2019年7月1日至2020年6月30日)确诊为ACS的185例住院患者进行数据分析。根据冠心病既往病史,将研究人群分为一级预防和二级预防两组。结果:参与者平均年龄为65.5±12.2岁,男性居多(81.6%)。57例(30.8%)患者有糖尿病史,97例(52.4%)患者有血脂异常史。高血压101例(54.6%),冠心病51例(27.9%)。在二级预防组中,只有三分之一的患者LDL-C达标,而五分之一的患者没有使用他汀类药物。使用抗血小板/抗凝剂的占94.5%。在糖尿病患者中,只有五分之一的患者使用GLP-1受体激动剂或/和SGLT-2抑制剂,而半数患者的HbA1c达到了目标。四分之一的患者是活跃的吸烟者。在一级预防组中,他汀类药物的使用总体较低(25.8%),但在糖尿病患者和高危非糖尿病患者中更常见(分别为47.1%和32.1%)。总体而言,不到四分之一的患者LDL-C达标。抗血小板/抗凝药物的使用率较低(20.1%),但糖尿病患者的使用率较高(52.9%)。在糖尿病组中,HbA1c达到61.8%的目标。超过三分之一的患者有吸烟习惯。结论:我们的数据显示,在相当大比例的ACS患者中,先前的CVD预防,无论是一级还是二级,都不能满足科学学会目前提供的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cross-Sectional, Non-Randomized, Single-Blinded, and Single-Center Study for the Accuracy of 12 Lead Smartphone ECG in the Detection of Ventricular Arrhythmias A Single Blinded, Cross-Sectional, Single-Center Study for the Validation of Atrial Fibrillation Detection using Spandan Smartphone ECG Bridging Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy with a Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Case Report of Protruded Implantable Cardiac Device through Chest in 50 Years Old Male Giant Hematoma of Rectus Abdominis Muscle in a Patient with Schistosomiasis without Periportal Abnormalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1